I had to rewrite this. You are the monsters who call themselves the human race.
It’s what I’ve been trying to communicate for so long: it’s too awful to become suicidal and stay suicidal.
This is the best thing I can come up with as a basis for care: it’s too awful to become suicidal and stay suicidal.
From this foundation is where the protection of suicidal individuals is going to be invented. The protection of suicidal individuals, the protection of the weak, it doesn’t exist yet in this civilisation of monsters.
The monsters have the protection against the fallibility of the mind in the meaning of vulnerability. The monsters who call themselves the human race do not yet have the protection of the weak as the meaning of vulnerability when applied to suicidal individuals and other victims of psychiatry.
So in this civilisation of monsters the protections are force, deprivation of liberty, imprisonment, violence and whatever evil and cruelty. That’s the methods of the laws that affect suicidal individuals and are deemed to be justified as essential care.
They are at best the protection against the fallibility of the mind. But there’s an implicit cruelty in them that’s the will “it doesn’t matter how cruel and evil the methods we use on suicidal individuals are as long as we get whatever we want from a suicidal individual”. That’s the only way imprisonment can be used on suicidal individuals as the monsters who call themselves the human race have done for centuries. Their sense of care and vulnerability applied to suicidal individuals is to justify unlimited cruelty and evil.
To use imprisonment as a method it risks making a suicidal individual want to die and making someone become suicidal. It’s the method of deliberate infliction of ruining quality of life as punishment but as if when it’s done out of a sense of care it doesn’t matter how cruel and evil the methods are as long as the monsters get whatever they want.
More than this it’s the will to risk making a suicidal individual want to die that’s the antithesis of care. It’s the opposite of the protection of the weak that defines the methods of psychiatric and mental health care that the monsters legislate for.
Do you understand? To have no qualms when inflicting, prolonging and worsening suicidality is what’s in the minds of monsters. It’s not the protection of the weak.
Do you not recognise the protection of the weak is primarily served by limiting cruelty and evil? Suicidal individuals are not protected how the weak are meant to be protected. It’s all about monsters getting whatever they want from suicidal individuals and by using unlimited cruelty and evil.
The monsters won’t deprive themselves of the unlimited cruelties and evils monsters want to do to a suicidal individual. The monsters refuse to legislate against the unlimited cruelty that can be done to a suicidal individual or against unlimited suffering.
Do you not recognise that the protection of the weak is primarily served by the protection against unlimited evil and cruelty and the suffering that results from unlimited cruelty and evil?
How much you are protected by the laws against being forced to suffer against your consent? How many laws serve the purpose of limiting cruelty and evil to protect you from being forced to suffer? Countless laws and legal precedents that serves the protection of the weak by limiting suffering without consent and limiting cruelty and evil to serve the protection of the weak. But only when it’s physical suffering.
Where is the protection of the weak for suicidal individuals? It doesn’t exist because the severity of the suffering of suicidal individuals and the sheer awfulness of facing what’s worth using one’s death to escape from is ignored.
It’s this will to legislate for unlimited cruelty and unlimited suffering that’s what prevails. The epitome of this will is the criminalisation of assisted suicide. It’s just cruelty.
The protection of the weak is defined by just how awful it is to become suicidal and stay suicidal. It’s inherently worse than death and that’s the truth suicidal individuals face that still being alive is worse than death.
Life and being alive is already worse than death. That’s what suicidal individuals face. It’s so awful it’s worth using one’s death to escape from.
This is not the feelings of a defective mind. It’s fundamental to the minds of conscious beings that there are things worse than death. Conscious beings recognise we have a limit to what we can suffer and endure beyond which we become suicidal – that’s the cause of suicidality that’s the consequence of the capacity to feel.
It’s only cruelty that ignores this limit to what can be endured but that’s the sense of care of psychiatric and mental health care. Thus there’s no protection of the weak for suicidal individuals in this civilisation of monsters.
You take the truth about feeling suicidal and you should be able to come up with a few things like these three fundamentals of care
- It’s too cruel to happen to anyone
- It’s too cruel do to anyone
- It’s too cruel to force anyone to endure
That’s how the weak are meant to be protected. By recognising the cruelty by how beyond awful it is to become suicidal and stay suicidal.
It’s the sense of care that recognises that the limit to what can endured has already been transgressed that’s the opposite of the sense of cruelty in psychiatric and mental health care because of the cruelty in ignoring the limit to what can be endured.
By recognising this truth it creates a sense of protection of suicidal individuals like the laws against physical suffering without consent. This sense of care and the protection of the weak can’t coexist with psychiatric and mental health care because it’s based on respecting the limit to suffering and what can be endured versus ignoring it. It’s the difference between legislating for unlimited suffering versus legislating for it that’s why a humane suicide system can’t coexist with psychiatric and mental health care. But it’s also the difference between the protection of human rights versus the tyranny of psychiatry.
It’s the difference between this suffering is too awful to happen versus successful suicide and a good death is too awful to happen. The latter is only a sense of cruelty based on ignoring the limit to what can be endured and that’s what comes from a system of care based on the lie about the cause of why suicidal individuals become suicidal and stay suicidal.
It is the ignorance of human nature that defines the sense of care of psychiatric and mental health care. It’s without recognising the capacity to feel comes with a limit to what can be endured that is meant to be respected but all psychiatric and mental health care does well is ignore this most basic truth.
It’s the most simple thing to recognise that if you face the same suicidal thoughts and feelings as a suicidal individual does then you’d want to die. Obviously? No. This level of empathy has never existed before because of the prevail of the lie of mental illness that purports why suicidal individuals become suicidal and stay suicidal is caused by a defective brain and mind. Thus the use of force and deprivation of liberty and imprisonment on suicidal individuals is justified. The very will to use unlimited cruelty and evil with absolutely no regard for the suffering such methods inflict on we who are already facing what’s worse than death is the sense of care of psychiatric and mental health care but it’s the opposite of care and the very opposite of the protection of the weak.
But the basis of a better and more humane suicide system is the simple truth that has never prevailed before: it’s too awful to become suicidal and stay suicidal. The purpose of every law and legal precedent that protects against being forced to suffer is the protection of the weak.
It’s the protection against becoming suicidal. It’s the protection against further suicidal thoughts and feelings. It’s the protection against the freedom to inflict, prolong and worsen suicidality indefinitely that’s fundamentally the protection of the weak. It’s the protection against the freedom to make a suicidal individual want to die. These are a few of the fundamentals of the protection of the weak.
Again let me reiterate the truth about feeling suicidal
- It’s too cruel to happen to anyone
- It’s too cruel to do to anyone
- It’s too cruel to force anyone to endure
Each one of these precepts forms the basis of the protection of suicidal individuals how the weak are meant to be protected.
It’s why there’s no care without assisted suicide. It’s the sense of care of the protection of the weak that is what assisted suicide is all about. It’s too awful to become suicidal and stay suicidal and once this becomes a basis for care then why the hell do I need to explain why there’s no care without assisted suicide?
When you respect the limit to what can be endured…but you don’t have this to guide you. It’s never meant to be transgressed and this is fundamental to the protection of the weak. It’s because it’s too awful to become suicidal and stay suicidal – when you recognise this truth then you will begin to invent the protection of suicidal individuals that’s the protection of the weak.
But by what guides you to invent the protection of suicidal individuals for the first time in the history of the monsters who call themselves the human race you should have no doubt why assisted suicide must be legal because it serves the same objectives of the protection of the weak.
It’s too awful to become suicidal and it’s too awful to stay suicidal and keep on feeling suicidal and being kept on being made to feel suicidal. This is the best I can do to achieve a sense of care that defines the protection of suicidal individuals how the weak are meant to be protected.
(NB – the argument I present here makes no reference to the fundamentals of democracy and human rights. It’s also without direct reference to the right to use one’s death to protect against unlimited cruelty and evil.)
(My psyche is so bloodied and burned and broken I want to use my right to use my death. But a freedom that doesn’t need the protection of human rights is the freedom to inflict prolong, and worsen suicidality indefinitely – I do not face care.)
(Obviously in all this work I’m trying to find something in you that wants me to die. It’s the futility of seeking to find a heart in you.)
a thing that defines the competency to care 