Do you get a sense of my hatred of the monsters who call themselves the human race in the title? When your humanity is as thoroughly betrayed as mine is then you’ll understand.
This post follows on from yesterday’s post as unlimited cruelty and unlimited suffering follows on from the criminalisation of assisted suicide and the will to consider it’s assisted suicide that’s the crime.
The rewards of assisted suicide are immeasurable. The mercy and protection of assisted suicide is without equal. If you have the capacity to feel then you can’t live without the hope of the mercy and protection of assisted suicide. If you have the competency to recognise the truth about human nature then I do not need to explain to you why you need the right to use one’s death.
But most of all of you are anything like me then you are better off having never been born than live without the hope of the mercy and protection of assisted suicide.
Where do I start?
Consider such care that recognises my life should never be so bad that I’m suicidal. This is a basic truth about care that’s never existed before.
It’s the first failure of care when a suicidal individual becomes suicidal. But it’s a sense of care yet to be invented.
The point I’ll no doubt make poorly is about the instincts of the monsters who call themselves the human race proven throughout history. The instincts of the monsters who call themselves the human race are always to do cruelty to suicidal individuals first and foremost. The proof is there throughout the centuries of the existence of psychiatry but for millennia before that the instincts of the monsters who call themselves the human race are to do cruelty to suicidal individuals first and foremost.
In yesterday’s post and in many others I touch on this point by considering why the methods of punishment – imprisonment – can ever be used on suicidal individuals. The instincts of the monsters who call themselves the human race are always to do cruelty to suicidal individuals first and foremost.
You might recognise this prevail of cruelty for suicidal individuals in the fact that the act of suicide was only decriminalised in the last century. How could the act of suicide ever be a crime – right? You do have at least this sense of recognition of cruelty to recognise the cruelty in the criminalisation of the act of suicide? And perhaps a sense of outrage too in “how could the act of suicide ever be a crime!”?
Can you transfer the feelings I have described in the paragraph above – if I have failed to evoke the feelings then just rely on the words – to what I’m saying when I say “my life should never be so bad that I’m suicidal”?
The sense of heartlessness that has prevailed for centuries in the guise of psychiatric and mental health care it has no sense of how to protect suicidal individuals how the weak are meant to be protected. How can the weak be protected when the sense of care is based on a fallacy and falsehood that’s what the lie of mental illness is?
So much heartlessness prevails and throughout the history of psychiatry when the monsters who call themselves the human race tried to care about suicidal individuals. Because the weight of feeling suicidal can’t be recognised by the lie of mental health and illness.
The awful mental state of feeling suicidal has never been appreciated and in fact the monsters who call themselves the human race are unaffected by how suicidal individuals feel. So unaffected by how suicidal individuals feel that the objective of the prevention of suicidal suffering, feelings and thoughts doesn’t exist yet. The tragedy is living in a time when the objective of living in safety from suicidality doesn’t exist that defines the tragedies caused by the criminalisation of assisted suicide are also deemed to be acceptable consequences.
By the same heartlessness that doesn’t recognise “my life should never be so bad I’m suicidal” is the inability to recognise the cruelty and evil in denying me my death. The weight of feeling suicidal is beared so easily by non suicidal individuals.
It’s the first protection that’s the protection against becoming suicidal and much as this is a difficult objective to achieve the challenge has to be accepted when you don’t bear the suicidal thoughts and feelings with by what’s innate to human nature.
It’s the protection against the worst state of mental suffering and the worst state of conscious existence that assisted suicide serves without equal. It’s even more invaluable because the instincts of the monsters who call themselves the human race are always to do cruelty to suicidal individuals first and foremost.
The criminalisation of assisted suicide is a ‘symptom’ of what normal represents and that’s to bear the suicidal thoughts and feelings of a suicidal individual as lightly as the heartless do.
Recently I read someone say the legalisation of assisted suicide is the cheap option. It’s not the cheap option. The legalisation of assisted suicide is formed from the foundation of a more humane suicide system and suicide laws (and civilisation) that weighs how suicidal individuals feel heavily.
It’s so so expensive to care by being affected by how suicidal individuals feel. To care by recognising what’s the worst state of mental suffering and the worst state of conscious existence demands a wide range of protections that defines humane care and the care of assisted suicide.
It’s the opposite of the sense of care that prevails that’s got the methods and objectives completely wrong. It’s the protecting suicidal individuals how the weak are meant to be protected that’s yet to be invented and it’s going to be damn expensive to achieve. But it’s the opposite of what prevails to this day and what defines the sense of cruelty of the monsters who call themselves the human race which is “we can use whatever evil and cruelty monsters want to do to a suicidal individual to get whatever we want from a suicidal individual because the cruelty doesn’t matter when it’s done to a suicidal individual”.
And that’s what defines the will to criminalise assisted suicide: the cruelty doesn’t matter when it’s done to a suicidal individual. The obvious consequence of being unaffected by how suicidal individuals is this will to use unlimited cruelty.
Because the acts of forcing someone to live are inherently cruel – a most basic truth ignored for centuries when the monsters who call themselves the human race tried to care about suicidal individuals. This cruelty always matters and in fact it is even more cruel when it’s done to a suicidal individual because of just how beyond awful it has to be when it’s so worth escaping from being forced to suffer and endure against one’s will that access to assisted suicide is a welcomed solution. It’s already life worse than death and there’s so much worth dying to escape from so the cruelty of forcing someone to suffer and endure against their will is even greater when it’s done to a suicidal individual.
(You already have the justifications for forcing suicidal individuals to live so I’m not going to talk about the necessity of such cruelty because you know how to justify whatever cruelty and evil monsters want to do to a suicidal individual. At best all you have is the protection against the fallibility of the mind and even in this I would rip into you. You do not yet have the protection of suicidal individuals how the weak are meant to be protected.)
If nothing else it’s the acts of taking power over how someone feels that defines the acts of forcing someone to live and again there’s inherent cruelty in taking power over how someone feels and obviously to force suffering against one’s will is such a cruelty in itself that it drives the decision to use one’s death.
It’s the protection against unlimited cruelty and evil that defines a more humane suicide system and suicide laws and this defines the first objective of care that is living in safety from suicidality and everything else and that’s also why assisted suicide can’t be illegal.
But it’s being affected by how suicidal individuals feel that provides the onus to demand these protections exist. You might believe you are affected by how suicidal individuals feel but you do recognise that care based on real empathy and compassion and understanding is yet to be invented?
For example the law makers have no concept of the abuse of suicidal individuals. Take something like domestic abuse laws that legislate for a higher crime when it’s domestic abuse. They legislate for higher protections because abuse in a relationship is even worse than an ordinary crime. They recognise the abuse that’s possible and they legislate against it. But for we whose life is worse than death already they have no concept of the abuse of a suicidal individual or what’s too cruel to do to a suicidal individual.
Do you understand? Because they weigh the awfulness of feeling suicidal as lightly as the monsters who call themselves the human race always do the law makers have no concept of what’s the abuse of a suicidal individual so they don’t have laws that protect suicidal individuals how the weak are meant to be protected. The domestic abuse laws are the protection of the weak but the law makers do not protect suicidal individuals how the weak are meant to be protected.
Without any humane protections and with zero protection of the weak to protect suicidal individuals. With zero protection against the abuses suicidal individuals face. This is the protection of the weak the law makers serve? No of course not. But neither is the criminalisation of assisted suicide the protection of the weak.
It’s just the perpetuation of evil that defines the criminalisation of assisted suicide. From the instincts of monsters to do cruelty to suicidal individuals first and foremost was born the institution of psychiatry. But even in these attempts to care the innate cruelty of the monsters who call themselves the human race prevails and denigrates the validity of the suicidal mind and dehumanises we who face what’s worse than death. So we have never been protected how the weak are meant to be protected.
My goodness…even the fear of becoming suicidal doesn’t prevail so the objective of living in safety from suicidality doesn’t exist yet. So neither does the fear of staying suicidal prevail and this is what defines the continued criminalisation of assisted suicide. Nor are there any humane protections of suicidal individuals how the weak are meant to be protected because the law makers do not have a concept that suicidal individuals can be abused.
It’s the embodiment of sadistic nature: the inherent cruelty in forcing someone to suffer and endure against our wills it doesn’t matter when we’re suicidal already. This defines more than the will to continue the criminalisation of assisted suicide.
But it’s all based on being unaffected by how suicidal individuals feel that’s why the protection of suicidal individuals how the weak are meant to be protected is yet to be invented. It’s not just the proof of the continued criminalisation of assisted suicide that’s the proof the monsters who call themselves the human race don’t know how or why to protect the weak.
(Vulnerability primarily means weakness. But it’s not the weak who are protected by everything built upon the lie of mental illness. Simply it’s just the prejudice that suicide is wrong that’s the prejudices enforced by the criminalisation of assisted suicide… because assisted suicide is without equal in serving the protection of the weak.)
Let me reiterate the clear and present heartlessness
My goodness…even the fear of becoming suicidal doesn’t prevail so the objective of living in safety from suicidality doesn’t exist yet. So neither does the fear of staying suicidal prevail and this is what defines the continued criminalisation of assisted suicide. Nor are there any humane protections of suicidal individuals how the weak are meant to be protected because the law makers do not have a concept that suicidal individuals can be abused.
So I am better off having never been born than to live amongst monsters like you. Because I don’t have the protection of the right to use my death and because of everything else that the monsters who call themselves the human race serve themselves with by the will to achieve – and legislate for – unlimited cruelty and unlimited suffering. This will defines more than the criminalisation of assisted suicide.
a thing that defines the competency to care 