Sadists own me and they choose how I feel. How else can I still need to die?

Many many times I talk about the criminalisation of assisted suicide as sadistic cruelty. It’s from vast amounts of personal experiences so generously given to me be the monsters who call themselves the human race that they take power over how I feel to protect their sadistic cruelty and the pursuits of their sadistic nature.

You might believe I face care. I don’t face care. I face sadistic cruelty. Why do you think I need to die?

I recognise the acts of forcing someone to live as the acts of taking power over how a suicidal individual feels. The criminalisation of assisted suicide is also all about taking power away from suicidal individuals and those who own suicidal individuals taking power over how we feel. The acts of forcing someone to live are the acts of forcing someone to suffer and endure against our wills and contrary to popular (cruel) beliefs these cruelties are even worse when done to a suicidal individual.

Do you get this point? It’s so bad what we suicidal individuals face that we want to use our death? It’s so bad the past present that it’s worse than death. It’s so beyond awful what we face that we’re choosing to die.

Countless laws and legal precedents have evolved by the progress of empathy for physical suffering. So many legal instruments protect against suffering without consent because it is cruelty that is protected against.

But when it’s suffering and life worth dying to escape from its even more cruel to force a suicidal individual to suffer and endure against our will. Unfortunately sadistic nature prevails so this inherent cruelty is either not recognised or ignored.

Much as I do respect that a degree of deprivation of liberty between decision and death is necessary to barrier access to assisted suicide for some suicidal individuals I do also greatly respect the competency of the monsters who call themselves the human race to be so very cruel.

The inherent cruelty in the acts of forcing someone to live are justified as essential care just how the criminalisation of assisted suicide is justified as essential care.

But it’s not care. I know it’s not care but it’s done by ignoring the severity of the suffering of suicidal individuals and the awfulness of feeling suicidal.

So when the monsters take power over how a suicidal individual feels – an act of cruelty – they maximise their cruelty by offering no humane protections for suicidal individuals. So suicidal individuals do have so much to fear beyond being forced to live.

It’s because the severity of the suffering of suicidal individuals and the awfulness of feeling suicidal is ignored. The worst state of mental suffering and the worst of conscience existence met by unlimited cruelty and the deprivation of the protection of human rights. There is no protection in the laws or human rights laws that are humane protections for suicidal individuals. There’s just force and deprivation of liberty used on suicidal individuals that’s the best the monsters who call themselves the human race can do.

It’s the personal experiences the monsters who call themselves the human race have so generously given me of just how much they really do care about the freedom to make a suicidal individual want to die. It is a freedom that exists in a civilisation of monsters.

The freedom to inflict prolong and worsen suicidality indefinitely. The freedom to make a suicidal individual want to die. The freedoms that are achieved when the objective of living in safety from suicidality doesn’t exist. These are unlimited cruelties and evils but so is the use of force and deprivation of liberty and imprisonment and even violence on suicidal individuals.

When I talk about the human race as the monsters who call themselves the human race and that human nature is innately sadistic this is from so much personal experience of what only sadists can do to a suicidal individual and that’s what the monsters who call themselves the human race have so generously given me.*

(* How many millennia in the future are the monsters who call themselves the human race going to recognise the truth about what I face?)

It’s taking power over how I feel and forcing me to suffer and endure against my will that’s what the acts of forcing me to live are. The cruelty is then matched by the humane protections for suicidal individuals? No of course not.

The worst state of conscious existence. The worst state of mental suffering. But it’s what I can trust the monsters who call themselves the human race to do that’s to ignore the severity of the suffering of suicidal individuals and the awfulness of feeling suicidal and that’s what I’m talking about when I speak about sadistic cruelty and sadistic nature.

My goodness…if the lie of mental health and illness had any value at all then there’d be so many protections of suicidal individuals. Because how a broken bone heals is by being protected from further harms and injuries.

Where are these sort of protections for suicidal individuals real doctors have to have to do their jobs well when they’re doing the jobs real doctors do?

You take the equivalent in physical health of someone who has multiple broken bones as a way to recognise the horrific awfulness of feeling suicidal but there’s no protections against further harms or injuries.

You recognise how the severity of the suffering of suicidal individuals and the awfulness of feeling suicidal is ignored? Because psychiatric care at best is oppressive not protective and at worst it’s a sense of sadistic cruelty that really does succeed in persuading everyone to ignore just how beyond awful it is to feel suicidal.

To ignore suffering is inherently cruel. But to ignore the severity of the suffering of suicidal individuals to such an extent that there are zero humane protections and call this care is the proof of the prevail of sadistic cruelty not anything that resembles care. Care without fear of unacceptable consequences because the unacceptable consequences to suicidal individuals the monsters who call themselves the human race really do not care about – that’s only a basis for cruelty and unlimited cruelty.

It’s a sense of cruelty that really does believe “it doesn’t matter how cruel or evil the methods we use on suicidal individuals are as long as we get whatever we want from a suicidal individual” that’s matched by the cruelty of the freedom to make a suicidal individual want to die and the freedom to inflict, prolong and worsen suicidality indefinitely.

It’s to take power over how a suicidal individual feels with no sense of responsibility for the unacceptable consequences of prolonged, furthered and worsened suicidality. It’s to not care about how awful it is already for suicidal individuals so instead of protections against unlimited suffering and unlimited cruelty it’s the sadistic cruelty to legislate for unlimited suffering and unlimited cruelty done to suicidal individuals. It’s the opposite of protecting someone with multiple broken bones like real doctors have to do to do their jobs well and in fact psychiatrists and others mental health professionals have no qualms when gorging on the freedom to make a suicidal individual want to die

This is only the cruelty of sadists. The laws that affect suicidal individuals legislate for unlimited cruelty and unlimited suffering. Not against them. It’s the will to take power over how a suicidal individual feels but with this power and this use of force there’s not an iota* of humane protections…so how do you believe it’s care we suicidal individuals face?

(*In the past couple of decades there might be an iota of humane protections coming into existence but barely an iota. The laws that affect suicidal individuals remain without an iota of humane protections.)

Assisted suicide is the opposite of all of this unlimited cruelty and evil because it gives suicidal individuals the power to choose how we feel.

Can’t you recognise assisted suicide is a crime because what’s so important to a suicidal individual falls so low on the agenda or not at all?

It’s the freedom to inflict, prolong and worsen suicidality indefinitely that’s what the criminalisation of assisted suicide represents.

You do recognise why assisted suicide is even more invaluable when such freedom exists? It’s to die that’s the choice so I don’t keep on feeling suicidal or being made to feel suicidal again and again. This is one way a suicidal individual uses assisted suicide to control how we feel and to protect ourselves from the inevitable.

Do you know what it’s like to be forced to live and the monsters who call themselves the human race will inevitably keep on making you want to die and that’s the freedom that’s protected?

The law makers accept such freedom as what?…care?! Such is the sadistic nature of human nature. They don’t legislate against unlimited cruelty and unlimited suffering. They legislate for it.

The freedom to inflict, prolong and worsen suicidality. The freedom to keep on making a suicidal individual want to die. The freedom to achieve unlimited suffering and unlimited cruelty. These are the things that are protected. The criminalisation of assisted suicide is essential to protect these freedoms that are the protection of sadists and sadistic cruelty.

To take power over how a suicidal individual feels to achieve unlimited cruelty and unlimited suffering. When the pitiful little care in psychiatric and mental health care fails then this is the last objective of care to achieve unlimited cruelty and unlimited suffering – and these are the very purposes of denying the hope of the mercy and protection of assisted suicide.

You think you care about me by not giving a flying fuck about how I feel or am going to feel even when I’m suicidal already? I’ve spared from using “fuck” and use the words “my goodness…” but fuck all of you is exactly the right words to use.

“I can’t bear responsibility for your good death of your choosing but I take power over how you feel and force you to faced unlimited suffering and unlimited cruelty and these are the acceptable consequences I can bear” – this is not a basis for care but it’s clearly a basis for the protection of the pursuits of sadists.

But what the monsters who call themselves the human race always do is to ignore the severity of the suffering of suicidal individuals and the awfulness of feeling suicidal. Even the human rights movement can’t bear to come up with humane protections such as the right to use one’s death.

It’s not about me but let me try to make it about me.

Who wants to take the worst moments of my life and keep on making certain they keep on happening and I have zero protections against unlimited cruelty or unlimited suffering? You are monsters after all. Even your law makers are sadists too.

Too many bear my suffering and the inexorable progress of my suicidality so easily like you’re a species of monsters born and bred evil. It’s bearing the severity of the suffering of suicidal individuals so easily and bearing the awfulness of feeling suicidal like it’s nothing. You are monsters after all and that’s why I’m still suicidal.

The very purpose of denying the hope of the mercy and protection of assisted suicide is to achieve unlimited suffering and unlimited cruelty. It’s the direct consequence of what’s protected and that’s the freedom to inflict, prolong and worsen suicidality indefinitely – this is the opposite of care.

What do you think is achieved by ignoring the limit to what I can suffer and endure? That’s the purpose of psychiatric and mental health care to ignore the limit to what a conscious being can endure. It defines the protections and what are justified as protections that make suffering unlimited and cruelty unlimited. It defines the protection of the freedom to inflict, prolong and worsen suicidality indefinitely that it’s sadistic cruelty and sadistic nature that defines the human race and who the law makers protect.

The monsters who call themselves the human race have succeeded in these objectives by the power they have over how I feel.

“It doesn’t matter how cruel or evil our methods are as long as we get whatever we want from a suicidal individual” – this is the opposite of care. “So what if he’s suicidal already” – I have so much personal experience of this in the minds of monsters that the monsters who call themselves the human race have so generously given me.

Can’t you recognise the truth yet? Why I can’t live amongst monsters like you and why I still have to die.

It’s not about me.

“He’s suicidal already so it doesn’t matter what unlimited cruelty and evil we want to do to help him. It doesn’t affect us” versus “I’m dead already so it doesn’t matter how much evil and cruelty a species of monsters born and bred evil wants to do to me instead of killing me. You no longer have power over how I feel.”

Leave a comment