How much does the human rights movement protect against suicidal individuals being tortured? From cradle to grave the monsters who call themselves the human race are unaffected by how suicidal individuals feel.

What’s the definition of torture? Extreme and prolonged exposure to the freedom of sadists and the pursuit of sadistic cruelty?

Or is just about a level of suffering you can’t bear anyone to endure ever that’s what defines the human right that protects against torture?

By which I mean is the definition of what torture is is it unlimited suffering?

But consider why torture is acceptable. It’s not just being victim to the minds of sadists. The sadists have a purpose for their sadistic cruelty. This is certainly true in war that those who are experts in torture have a reason to do it.

In war torture is used to break a prisoner of war. It is used to make a prisoner of war do something they don’t want to do. It’s not just about the freedom of sadists that’s what defines torture used in war. It’s the use of inflicting extreme suffering to, for example, learn about the enemy’s plans.

But how does torture work? Torturers have make their victims want to do anything to escape the suffering sadists want to achieve. To get their victims give up information against their will they have to inflict enough suffering that their victims are willing to do whatever the torturers want to end the torture.

Do you think torturers succeed by making their victims suicidal then force their victims to live to keep on making them want to die?

So desperate to escape life worse than death and suffering worse than death the victims of torture would do anything…do you think such desperation is what torturers depend on achieving by first making their victims want to die then force them to live to keep on making them want to die and that’s how torturers succeed?

I truly believe that if the monsters who call themselves the human race were ever affected by how suicidal individuals feel then it would be the suicide laws that protect against torture. The acts of deliberately forcing someone to live to keep on making them want to die would be recognised as pure evil if the monsters who call themselves the human race are ever affected by how suicidal individuals feel.

But do you recognise why assisted suicide is a protection without equal? Do you recognise just how powerful the right to use one’s death is as a fundamentally humane protection against unlimited suffering and unlimited cruelty? Torturers can never succeed. Torturers would be out of a job if there are humane suicide laws.

But just how much evil prevails in this civilisation of monsters?

The very purpose of denying the hope of the mercy and protection of assisted suicide is to protect evil never satiated when making a suicidal individual want to die.

There is an an amount of deprivation of liberty between decision and death that serves as a protection. But to completely deny the hope of the mercy and protection of assisted suicide only protects the pursuit of sadistic cruelty.

But just how much evil prevails in this civilisation of monsters? The human rights movement protects prisoners of war not suicidal individuals.