The protection of the weak doesn’t exist yet. Not for suicidal individuals and other victims of psychiatry. When it is already worse than death there’s nothing that resembles humane protections for the weak.
The law makers just like the rest of the monsters who call themselves the human race are utterly unaffected by how suicidal individuals to such a profound extent that something so important for the protection of the weak – what assisted suicide obviously is – is a crime.
“We can’t legalise assisted suicide because we have to protect the vulnerable”
My personal experience of being suicidal is that the minds of monsters prevail.
What good is there in forcing me to live when the competency to care doesn’t exist? I am forced to suffer and endure so much – too much if the monsters had a heart to recognise the limit to what I can endure – against my will because the competency to care doesn’t exist yet.
It is because the monsters who call themselves the human race are utterly unaffected by how suicidal individuals feel. Because their medical suicide experts are utterly unaffected by how suicidal individuals feel. There is not a single humane protection of the weak.
No one in this civilisation of monsters who has any power has any competency to care about suicidal individuals. Thus I’m still fighting for the only protection by which I’ll be safe at last.
One of the responses I’ve had to my fight for the protection of assisted suicide is “we can’t legalise assisted suicide because we have to protect the vulnerable”. This is the epitome of the evil that prevails throughout the history of the monsters who call themselves the human race.
The individual who gave me this reply is at best talking about the protection against the fallibility of the mind. That’s the corrupted meaning of vulnerability that’s been used throughout the history of the existence of psychiatry. Vulnerability in the meaning used by monsters means having an incompetent mind but an incompetent mind defined by the concepts of mental illness. Not by the real meaning of words such as vulnerable or illness.
(The individual who gave me this reply believes that nuclear weapons aren’t too evil to exist. Such incompetency of a mind. She voted for nuclear submarines designed to mass murder.)
The common meaning of vulnerability is weakness. This is the truthful meaning of vulnerability that it means weakness and fragility and sensitivity.
This truthful meaning of vulnerability is why assisted suicide is never a crime. The weak need the hope of the mercy and protection of assisted suicide to be safe. Assisted suicide serves so many purposes of which it’s without equal and one of these is the protection of the weak it serves without equal. To protect against unlimited suffering and unbearable suffering and unbearable quality of life and unlimited cruelty this is why assisted suicide can never be a crime but it’s illegal when the monsters who call themselves the human race are unaffected by how suicidal individuals feel.
Feeling suicidal is the worst state of conscious existence. It’s the worst state of mental suffering. It’s facing what’s worse than death that’s what being suicidal is about. It’s about being beyond the limit to what a conscious being can suffer and endure that’s the horrific awfulness of choosing to use one’s death.
It is the fragility of a suicidal individual’s psyche that drives the decision to die. It’s the capacity to feel that obviously comes with a limit to what can be endured and beyond this is when a suicidal individual recognises that safety is achieved by death that’s the weakness of every suicidal individual. It’s when facing unlimited cruelty that’s when the weak become suicidal and stay suicidal.
Having a limit to what can be endured is why there are things worse than death. Having the capacity to feel comes with a limit to what can be endured and beyond this living is worse than death. This is all about weakness and fragility and sensitivity to recognise that there are things worse than death and worth dying to fight against or escape from.
(Here I’m alluding the to the commonality of the decision to use the methods of war and the decision to use one’s death.)
So where’s the protection of the weak? Perhaps a better way to say it is who in this civilisation of monsters has a mind competent to protect suicidal individuals how the weak are meant to be protected?
There are many laws and legal precedents that legislate against being forced to suffer and against suffering without consent. This is the protection of the weak.
At the same time there’s the freedom to suffer with consent. This link here is to broken bones in mixed martial arts fights. The strong can choose to suffer more and face injuries the weak can’t bear to face. Less brutal and violent than MMA and UFC fights are marathons but still there’s pain and injury that’s consented to.
Where’s the protection of suicidal individuals how the weak are meant to be protected the law makers care about? Where’s the respect for the consent of suicidal individuals and our choices and free will the law makers care about?
What the law makers believe in is the freedom to inflict, prolong and worsen suicidality indefinitely. What the law makers protect is the freedom to make a suicidal individual want to die. This is the effect of how profoundly dehumanising the medical profession are in their pathetic attempts to care about suicidal individuals and other victims of psychiatry and the effect is the law makers are utterly unaffected by how suicidal individuals feel or care what’s important to us. Ask a suicidal individual how much they want to face the freedom to make a suicidal individual want to die – but the law makers don’t care.
Consider the domestic abuse laws. They’re obviously important to victims of domestic abuse but they’re also the protection you’ll never understand why it’s important because you are protected from domestic abuse.
They legislate for a higher crime than the rest of the laws that legislate against suffering and injury without consent. It has not always prevailed throughout history that the law makers know just how wrong domestic abuse is. But by the progress of empathy they are so against domestic abuse that the domestic abuse laws legislate for a higher crime than the common laws against suffering and injury without consent.
The domestic abuse laws protect the weak. They achieve a way the weak can live in safety when domestic abuse is recognised to be too cruel to happen to anyone by the law makers.
So where’s the protection of suicidal individuals how the weak are meant to be protected? No doubt such protections are difficult to achieve but more essential and vital than difficult.
But the law makers care so little about protecting suicidal individuals from unlimited cruelty and in fact in the name of psychiatric and mental health care they do legislate for unlimited cruelty done to suicidal individuals. The obvious example is the use of imprisonment – the method of deliberately ruining quality of life as punishment – to “protect the vulnerable”.
They care about the freedom to inflict, prolong and worsen suicidality indefinitely and the freedom to make a suicidal individual want to die. They always have throughout the history of the existence of psychiatry. They seek to legislate for the unlimited suffering and unlimited cruelties done not just to suicidal individuals but so many other victims of psychiatry because “we have to protect the vulnerable”. What competency do you recognise in the minds of monsters?
(You recognise the difference between controlling suicidal individuals and controlling the monsters who call themselves the human race as the protection of the weak? The former is achieved by any cruelty justified by the minds of monsters while the latter it doesn’t exist.)
Now consider the health and safety laws. They’re quite new in the history of the monsters who call themselves the human race that such precautions are deemed to be worth legislating for.
(Imagine you teleported back a hundred years ago and explained that while the health and safety laws are difficult they are more necessary than difficult to care about. Then you might understand a tiny little bit about what I face.)
They reach for a level of precaution and prevention higher than the other protections of justice and punishment. They are difficult protections to achieve but they’re based on a level of compassion and empathy higher than has existed except in the last half century to go so much further to protect the weak and strive so much harder to combat the evil and cruelty that prevails.
But where’s such protections of suicidal individuals how the weak are meant to be protected? How much can the monsters who call themselves the human race recognise the difference between cruelty and care when they’re still so utterly unaffected by how suicidal individuals? Contrast the protections the weak deserve who are not victims of psychiatry with what we face and recognise the awfulness of human nature that is revealed in the anarchy of zero protections of suicidal individuals how the weak are meant to be protected.
(At this point consider my despair in expecting care. Recognise why I can’t live in safety.)
Now consider the human rights framework. It is the pain in the arse of every government and it is so important for the protection of the weak as well as to protect liberty and free will and make consent important.
The human rights movement are just like every beautiful fool who tries to legislate in wars. When mass murder is a justified method – one definition of war – there are the beautiful fools who try to legislate and protect in wars.
Wars are all about the will to achieve the goal by any means necessary but the human rights movement tries to legislate in war. War is all about justifying the use of any method no matter how cruel or evil the methods are but the beautiful fools try to limit the cruelty and evil of the methods used in wars.
For example prisoners of war they try to protect against unlimited suffering and unlimited cruelty by the human right against torture. Again it’s the protection of the weak they want to extend to enemy combatants by depriving torturers of their freedom.
But where’s the beautiful fools to protect suicidal individuals how the weak are meant to be protected? Where’s the protection of the human rights movement against unlimited suffering and the unlimited cruelties the victims of psychiatry face every single day for centuries?
They protect prisoners of war and enemy combatants before the human rights movement wants to protect suicidal individuals. Why do you think this is? The monsters who call themselves the human race can’t care?
Should I include the Queen too in all the hells of being suicidal and living amongst the monsters who call themselves the human race? There’s the Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals and there’s the Royal College of Psychiatry but there’s no Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Suicidal Individuals.
Even though it’s the worst state of conscious existence and mental suffering… who wants to protect suicidal individuals how the weak are meant to be protected? Where’s the protection of the vulnerable in the common meaning of the word?
You recognise why I can’t live in safety and why the safety I’m fighting for is the mercy and protection of assisted suicide. There’s no protection of the weak for suicidal individuals. So profoundly unaffected by how suicidal individuals feel the monsters who call themselves the human race think of all the things they can’t do to me it’s the mercy and protection of assisted suicide they can’t bear.
You can’t feel the effects of these truths I see so clearly? Don’t you recognise yet I face cruelty not care?
Do you recognise the monsters who call themselves the human race don’t have competent minds to care and protect the weak because they’re always unaffected by how suicidal individuals feel? Empathy for suicidal individuals is not innate to human nature. Barbaric cruelty is what’s innate to human nature.
The legalisation of assisted suicide, the establishment of the right to use one’s death to stop the monsters who call themselves the human race, the protection against unlimited cruelty and unlimited suffering are yet to be invented because the monsters who call themselves the human race are monsters and reveal their nature to me – if not you – by what a species of monsters born and bred evil can’t bear to happen or to do to a suicidal individual.
They bear years of forcing me to suffer even more. Not ordinary suffering but suicidal feelings and thoughts. They do care about making me victim to unlimited suffering and unlimited cruelty.
In all of the times in my life I spend suicidal they have had more than enough opportunities to care but they mostly succeed in achieving control and cruelty – even today it’s their control and cruelty that comes first and is furthered by denying me my right to use my death to stop them. They take so much power over how I feel and only have the competency to make their cruelty what’s absolutely flawless.
To begin their evil by ignoring that I have a limit to what I can face and suffer and endure against my will… but it’s what the monsters who call themselves the human race always do because they’re utterly unaffected by how suicidal individuals feel. So devoid of understanding of their own nature that something so obvious that the capacity to feel comes with a limit to what can be endured they only succeed in achieving control and cruelty.
The monsters who call themselves the human race have already succeeded in achieving my unlimited suffering by denying me my right to use my death to stop them. This is one purpose of assisted suicide to protect against unlimited suffering but they are so unaffected by how suicidal individuals feel always.
But do you comphrend just how much unlimited cruelty and evil this suicidal individual and every other suicidal like me faces when the monsters who call themselves the human race take power over how a suicidal individual feels by the acts of forcing someone to live? Reread this from the beginning if you can’t recognise the sadistic nature of human nature cares about the uniimited cruelties and evils that can be done to a suicidal individual.
All this unlimited cruelty it only makes assisted suicide even more invaluable in its role of protecting the weak. Because they’re still unaffected by how suicidal individuals and devoid of even the most basic compassion for suicidal individuals.
Without this foundation of care that’s being affected how suicidal individuals feel they don’t have the competency to care and that’s why my existence is for them to torture a suicidal individual without remorse or mercy.
All my existence they only prove the limit to what I can suffer and endure is there to be ignored and that’s what they’re still doing because they’re still unaffected by how suicidal individuals feel.
Look at the uniimited cruelties and evils I mention here that’s what the law makers legislate for not against. How can any suicidal individual live in safety?
To protect their freedom to inflict, prolong and worsen suicidality indefinitely that’s why the monsters who call themselves the human race take away what makes my life my life. But I’m not human so I don’t get the protection of human rights. So I don’t have the right to use my death to stop the monsters who call themselves the human race.
They take away this right that makes my life my life but because the human rights movement don’t care about suicidal individuals such an essential right it doesn’t exist. They always do care about protecting the freedom to make a suicidal individual want to die though. The beautiful fools who would try to legislate against torture they have no concept of what’s too cruel to do to a suicidal individual. They don’t protect suicidal individuals so the right to use one’s death doesn’t exist yet.
And what do you do when all these hells upon hell are happening to me and other suicidal individuals? Your life is full of the privilege of not recognising why you need the right to use your death. You have the blessing of not recognising the human race are a species of monsters while I face the proof of the sadistic nature of human nature that’s never changed throughout history. So sadistic they’re always unaffected by how suicidal individuals feel. Too cruel to have an iota of empathy for suicidal individuals so there are no humane protections for suicidal individuals how the weak are meant to be protected. And no heart to stop them – and that’s why the right to use one’s death is even more invaluable in a civilisation of monsters as truly evil as the monsters who call themselves the human race are.
Why can’t you even recognise what happens when the monsters who call themselves the human race force suicidal individuals to live without the competency to care so without any humane protections of the weak? They torture suicidal individuals without remorse or mercy.
But assisted suicide is the best protection against torture. It’s is without equal in so many purposes in its role in protecting the weak. Torturers will only ever have a job whenever and wherever assisted suicide is a crime. Because they can’t succeed if their victims have the right to use their deaths to stop them.
Assisted suicide is without equal in its role in protecting the weak from unlimited suffering and unlimited cruelty in so many respects. It’s even more invaluable when the competency to care about suicidal individuals doesn’t exist yet. When the monsters who call themselves the human race are still unaffected by how suicidal individuals feel it only makes assisted suicide even more invaluable. When they have no heart to stop them it only makes the right to use one’s death even more invaluable.
Do you comphrend the truth? Do you know what you have to do when you are affected by how suicidal individuals feel yet? Do you even recognise what’s too cruel to do to a suicidal individual when the competency to care doesn’t exist?
I know what a species of monsters born and bred evil wants to do to a suicidal individual and why the monsters who call themselves the human race can’t do anything else. The proof of these truths is neverending and only limited by my death.
But what do you do when you know the monsters who call themselves the human race can’t do anything else but torture a suicidal individual?
It’s the fundamental question about you. When you know a species of monsters born and bred evil can’t do anything else to a suicidal individual are you part of it or on the side of a suicidal individual? When a suicidal individual faces so much unlimited cruelty do you want to take away what makes my life my life and deny me the right to use my death to stop them or be part of the unlimited cruelties and evils achieved by denying me my right to use my death to stop you?
Can’t you recognise what’s too cruel to do to a suicidal individual… can’t you recognise the truth?
a thing that defines the competency to care 