This is another way to make some of the points in this post.
To force someone to live and keep on making them want to die is care. But to force someone to live to keep on making them want to die is torture. If I fail to make the point about the conditions that prevail and the minds of monsters that prevails then this is the point.
What do you do when you really want to hurt someone? You force your victim to live to keep on making them want to die.
If you really want to hurt someone you cannot stop at making them want to die. You have to force them to live to keep on making them want to die. You have to achieve the mental state of life worse than death but you cannot stop there if you really want to hurt someone. If your really want to hurt someone you can’t stop your evil when your victim faces the worst state of conscious existence and the worst state of mental suffering. You have to force your victim to keep on making them want to die.
Do you recognise what is pure evil? Do you recognise what is absolute sadistic cruelty?* Of course not. The monsters who call themselves the human race have absolutely no concept of what’s too cruel to do to a suicidal individual and this is what defines more than the unlimited cruelty of the criminalisation of assisted suicide.
( * Do I need to explain to you why such acts are acts of pure evil? Probably… only need to explain this because you are utterly unaffected by how suicidal individuals feel.)
Look at the laws that affect suicidal individuals and see what they legislate for and against.
It is the brutality and the barbaric cruelty of monsters that defines what the suicide laws legislate for and against.
Think of the intentional act I’m starting this piece off with. If you really want to hurt someone you have to make them want to die then force them to live to keep on making them want to die. The suicide laws do not protect against such pursuit of sadistic cruelty and pure evil.
Who would do such pure evil? I assume torturers want to. Torture is more than about inflicting suffering. It’s about breaking the victim’s will. It’s about getting whatever the torturers want from their victims that their victims won’t give them. Let’s say it’s information torturers want and the enemy combatant won’t give up the information. So torturers succeed by inflicting extreme suffering.
But as much as torture is about using extreme suffering it succeeds by making the victim want to die then forcing the victim to live to keep on making them want to die. The victims of torture won’t willingly give up information so the torturers have to start by making the victim want to die. They have to achieve a state of personal suffering worse than death to force their victims to give up the information then force them to live to keep on making them want to die until they get whatever they want. Perhaps this is not the case with every victim of torturers but I assume it’s common to make force a suicidal individual to live* to keep on making them want to die that’s how torturers succeed.
(* Because the right to use one’s death and the universal provision of access to assisted suicide prevents torture and puts torturers out of a job. It is absolutely necessary to force a suicidal individual to live to achieve the objectives of torturers. I am reminded of the Sri Lanka civil war and the rebels were provided with cyanide to get in the way of the government who used horrific forms of torture. Torture can only happen to the living.)
Obviously there are laws against torture. But the laws that affect suicidal individuals don’t protect against torture and that’s the tragedy. The suicide laws in a civilisation of monsters do not protect suicidal individuals against the will to deliberately force a suicidal individual to live to keep on making them want to die. But it’s humane suicide laws that are I believe the only hope that torture will never succeed and that’s what will put torturers out of a job. For the simple reason that assisted suicide gets in the way. The right to use one’s death is far more powerful a protection against torture than the existing laws against torture but so is the protection against the freedom to make a suicidal individual want to die.
Do you recognise what happens when the law makers are so utterly unaffected by how suicidal individuals feel? There is no protection from the suicide laws against the will to intentionally make someone want to die then force them to live to keep on making them want to die. This profound heartlessness is so profound and pervasive that assisted suicide is a crime.
When it’s so bad to be suicidal…but it’s this truth that’s never been recognised or has prevailed before that it’s so beyond horrifically beyond awful to feel suicidal. It defines what exists right now and what exists right now are the opposite of humane suicide laws. To be unable to recognise a state of mental existence worse than death for what it is is what defines the purpose of the suicide laws in this civilisation of monsters.
What else is going to happen when the (medical) suicide experts are devoid of even the most basic empathy or understanding or compassion or mercy or even remorse to protect suicidal individuals? But their very involvement in ruling over mental diversity and mental suffering is based on a monumental fallacy which I crudely refer to as the lie of mental illness.
I started this with an example of pure evil and absolute sadistic cruelty that’s the will to really hurt someone by making them want to die then forcing them to live to keep on making them want to die. It’s not legislated against by the suicide laws and in fact in a way it’s legislated for by the criminalisation of assisted suicide. The key element of really wanting to hurt someone is evil not satiated by making the victim want to die but it’s the acts of forcing someone to live that’s how such barbaric and sadistic cruelty can be achieved.
I started with this example of pure evil and absolute sadistic cruelty not legislated against by the suicide laws and in fact by the criminalisation of assisted suicide it’s legislated for.
So can you now consider the lesser evils than the will to really hurt someone defined by making them want to die then forcing them to live to keep on making them want to die?
Again if you can’t recognise what’s pure evil and absolute sadistic cruelty then I trust you are unaffected by how suicidal individuals feel. It’s worse than death. It’s the state of conscious existence and the worst state of mental suffering. When being alive is worth dying to escape from. To be beyond the limit to what can be suffered and endured to such an extreme that dying becomes a welcomed solution. This is what feeling suicidal is about.*
(* The tragedy is I’ve failed to make this point clearly. My incompetency is that I’ve failed to humanise suicidal individuals.)
But for centuries the suicide experts have dehumanised suicidal individuals. They have consistently misrepresented the mental state of feeling suicidal as the product of a mental illness, the product of a defective brain thus the product of a defective mind. It is the dehumanisation of suicidal individuals based on the belief of your suicide experts that it’s a brain defect that’s responsible for why suicidal individuals become suicidal and stay suicidal.
So the law makers have absolutely no concept of what’s too cruel to do to a suicidal individual. Because the law makers are utterly unaffected by how suicidal individuals feel.
So acts of pure evil done to a suicidal individual are not legislated against and by the barbaric cruelty that’s the basis for the criminalisation of assisted suicide such pure evil is legislated for.
Such a protection against the will to really hurt someone by making them want to die then forcing them to live to keep on making them want to die is a protection that protects only a few suicidal individuals.
But what are lesser evils and cruelties suicidal individuals should be protected against?
For centuries the suicide experts have believed in one harm that can be done to a suicidal individual and that’s successful suicide. They have not had any other concept of harm. Because they’re utterly incompetent to care about suicidal individuals the only harm that for centuries your suicide experts have believed can’t be done to a suicidal individual is successful suicide and dying a good death. Such is how cruel human nature is.
So such pure evil as I’ve already described here is possible. But what about the lesser evils when no one gave you any concept of what’s too cruel to do to a suicidal?
The tyranny of the heartless – the law makers and the medical profession – is so revealed by what are deemed acceptable consequences. It’s the harms and abuses that cannot be done to a suicidal individual it really does reveal the truth about human nature.
The suicide laws in a civilisation of monsters primarily focus on doing everything possible to deprive suicidal individuals of successful suicide. They do absolutely nothing to protect against the harms and abuses – there’s no protection against the cruelties and evils that cannot ever be done to a suicidal individual.
It’s the acceptable consequences that are acceptable consequences for monsters to do to suicidal individuals that are what the suicide laws protect. But the laws that affect suicidal individuals also legislate for unlimited cruelty and evil and unlimited suffering because these are acceptable consequences for monsters to do to suicidal individuals.
For example would monsters use the method of punishment on suicidal individuals with no qualms about the suffering the deliberate act of ruining quality of life has? But it’s one of the first recourses of monsters to imprison suicidal individuals.*
(* But of course monsters make every effort to differentiate between the use of imprisonment as punishment and as care…no…monsters don’t even bother to try to make this difference.)
Because it doesn’t matter if you and your kind make a suicidal individual want to die does it? Because you don’t have any concept of the harms and abuses that can’t be done to suicidal individuals. Because you have absolutely no concept of what’s too cruel to do to a suicidal individual.
You are happy with the freedom to do whatever evil and cruelty the monsters who call themselves the human race want to do to a suicidal individual.
So when the monsters who call themselves the human race force a suicidal individual to live then keep on making them want to die – that’s the lesser evil compared to the intentional act of pure evil of deliberately forcing a suicidal individual to live to keep on making them want to die. You’re okay with this. You’re happy when this happens not to just this suicidal individual but so many more like me. That the monsters who call themselves the human race accept as acceptable consequences that they force a suicidal individual to live to keep on making us want to die.
Because while your suicide experts have done so much to achieve control and cruelty and to own suicidal individuals and rob us of liberty and the protection of human rights…these acts of cruelty are married to an anarchy of having absolutely no concept of what’s too cruel to do to a suicidal individual.
You see what the lie of mental illness has created and see it like I do. The freedom to inflict, prolong and worsen suicidality indefinitely is what’s protected. The freedom to make a suicidal individual want to die is so well protected that assisted suicide is a crime.
You can tell me you care but what care do you have?
The intentional act of pure evil and then what’s the lesser evil?
What you think by the monsters who call themselves the human race being free to do whatever evil and cruelty monsters want to do to a suicidal individual – which is protected by the laws that affect suicidal individuals – you care? But by the same sense of care the only protection against the uniimited cruelties and evils the monsters who call themselves the human race want to do to a suicidal individual – you think it’s assisted suicide that’s the crime?
What do you think it feels like to face what’s worse than death? What do you think it feels like to look forward to dying every single day? You have never ever answered these questions before with a heart to guide you…you have never answered these questions with an iota of a shred of competency to care.
You accept the risk of making a suicidal individual want to die as an acceptable risk and an acceptable consequence. You support the anarchy legislated for by the suicide laws that there’s absolutely no concept of what’s too cruel to do to a suicidal individual and in fact abuses and harms too great to do to a suicidal individual are legislated for not against.
This anarchy is married with the cruelty of the criminalisation of assisted suicide. The criminalisation of assisted suicide is in itself the protection of the will to achieve unlimited cruelty and unlimited suffering – what I know too well as well as victims of torture know.
You even have an iota of empathy for me? With the opportunities to care and succeed in achieving what’s important to a suicidal individual I give freely. Then there’s the opportunities to care achieved by force and control and cruelty…they fail too. But it’s care without mercy or remorse so it’s assisted suicide that’s the crime.
But it’s care that fails so often because it’s not humane. It’s all about control and cruelty that’s what the laws that affect suicidal individuals serve and not a single humane protection that’s so so obviously important to suicidal individuals.
And it’s all about what’s in the minds of monsters. “we force you to live because this essential care” and “we deny you your death because this is essential care” that defines the cruelty of the criminalisation of assisted suicide. But this cruelty is married to the anarchy legislated for by the suicide laws that protects the freedom to make a suicidal individual want to die.
Would the monsters who call themselves the human race force a suicidal individual to live to keep on making us want to die? Yes. This comes so easily to do to the monsters who call themselves the human race.
How do you use the information about what makes a suicidal individual want to die and makes other suicidal individual want to die to protect suicidal individuals? You don’t. You don’t even try to protect suicidal individuals.
When you think the only harm that can be done to a suicidal individual is successful suicide and there’s no other harm. When you have absolutely no concept of what’s too cruel to do to a suicidal individual. When you clearly believe there’s no harms or abuses or too much evil or too much suffering too great to expect a suicidal individual to face.
How can you save us when you are utterly unaffected by how suicidal individuals feel?
Your suicide experts have taught you to built (metaphorical and physical) prisons instead of (metaphorical) fortresses to protect we whose lives are worth dying to escape from. Assisted suicide is part of the fortress and it’s even more invaluable when the law makers are utterly unaffected by how suicidal individuals feel so do legislate for evil and pure evil not against it.
Do you even recognise the acts of forcing someone to live are about taking power away from a suicidal individual and taking power over how we feel? But it’s power with no sense of responsibility to protect suicidal individuals from even more of what can’t be beared by any humane being. Unfortunately there are only monsters here.
My gods…it should be entirely about what you want when it happens to you but this sense of equality is utterly worthless when you are unaffected by how suicidal individuals feel. And that’s the proof of my suicidal thoughts and feelings. You really are utterly unaffected by how suicidal individuals feel.
You want prisons or fortresses to protect suicidal individuals? You only have invented prisons at the moment. The criminalisation of assisted suicide is a prison and the tragedy really really is that the will of the monsters who call themselves the human race to hurt and harm me and risk making me want to die because the evil at your cores isn’t satiated by imprisoning me alive.
That’s the reason if no other why I have so much proof – too much proof – that I’ll never live in safety amongst monsters like you. That’s the difference you make to my existence.
a thing that defines the competency to care 