The first point is what suicidal individuals face and comphrension of the enormity of what we face.
The next point is recognising the cruelty of the use of force and deprivation of liberty and what’s essentially care that imprisons both metaphorically and physically. The walls are the control and cruelty in forcing suicidal individuals to suffer against one’s will.
Then what do you do because of the cruelty in what you are doing and recognise “it’s about us getting whatever we want not about you or what you want and don’t want” that’s the cruelty in duty of care
Duty of cruelty defines what you give suicidal individuals for what you take from us and the cruelty in being forced to live.
Point 1 epistemology
Rather than focus on the pain and your emotional response to the severity of the suffering of suicidal individuals and the awfulness of feeling suicidal let me try to persuade your rational side.
Take the example of a women a millennium ago regularly beaten by her husband. The prevailing wisdom would do nothing to stop the beating or protect the victim. She cannot divorce her husband because divorce was deemed to be wrong whereas a wife routinely beaten by her husband was acceptable.
Why was divorce wrong? The source of truth in those times was that divorce is wrong because it is against god’s will. The source of truth was from a religious basis. The laws were based on a religious source of truth so divorce was wrong. Divorce was more cruel and evil than a woman being endlessly beaten by her husband.
There were also argument made and reasons deemed rational for seeing divorce as the unacceptable evil and cruelty a millennium ago. Like “think of the impact on the weak and the vulnerable if divorce is legal. Think of the impact on the children”. Or “how can a woman support a family on her own. She needs a husband”. Or perhaps “a woman can’t have the competency to make the decision to divorce. They’re women. They are incompetent to do anything else but breed”.
Remember this was a time when women were severely prejudiced against and deemed to have minds that should be subordinate to the minds of men so if a women wouldn’t accept the beating her husband was free to routinely do to her then it’s just a woman being silly. Even families wealthy enough to afford to give their children a good education then commonly the women wouldn’t get an education. It was a time when the minds of women were deemed inadequate to do anything else but breed and men were who to worked and made the decisions.
A woman couldn’t divorce for the rational reason that she couldn’t even feed her children and her herself or have a home without a husband as well as because of the religious beliefs. Women in this time accepted this as the truth and would with the same truth accept a husband beating his wife senseless was acceptable.
There was a similar religious belief at the time that suicide was wrong in the eyes of the lord as was divorce and homosexuality. Women and men didn’t have such things as the protection of human rights or the welfare system. It was a different source of truth then from which human rights flow from. It was the source of truth of the will of god.
Much has changed in the last millennium but human nature hasn’t changed when it comes to the denigration and oppression of the suicidal mind. The human rights movement for example really do not give a damn about protecting suicidal individuals.
It’s not a religious source of truth used to oppress the suicidal mind. It’s something far worse. It’s a medical source of truth and the corruption of the scientific method that’s the source of truth used to continue the oppression and dehumanisation of the suicidal mind.
It’s the same oppression and subjugation but instead of a religious source of truth it’s a medical source of truth. The epistemology has changed but it’s the same oppression and subjugation and sub human status that defines psychiatric and mental health care.
Unfortunately both epistemologies are wrong. But everything built in the name of care for suicidal individuals is based on a false source of truth. It’s not just the corruption of the scientific method but the corruption of the very meaning of words as well.
It all leads to so much cruelty and so much cruelty and evil protected…it really doesn’t lead to care. This is what I face to this day of my unwanted existence. It’s such a mild way to put it “my unwanted existence”.
It’s the curse of the lie of mental illness.
It goes by a few names such as the biomedical model or the biological model of mental illness that’s what the institution of psychiatry is founded on and perpetuates.
It is the idea of illness that a biological (brain) defect is the cause of mental suffering and certain types of mental diversity there to be ruled over by the medical profession. That’s the lie of mental illness and the source of truth the monsters who call themselves the human race have been working from in the centuries they’ve attempted to care about suicidal individuals (and other victims of psychiatry).
It’s quite specific in how the biomedical model of psychiatry and mental illness and mental health acts to oppress and subjugate and confer sub human status. A biological difference misrepresented as a biological defect serves as the proof that a mind is sub human and incompetent. The cause of the mental phenomena and symptoms of mental illness are the product of a defective mind because the brain is defective and it’s this brain defect that’s responsible for, for example, suicidal suffering, feelings and thoughts.
I’m sure psychiatrists don’t recognise they’re the scum of the earth for coming up with this. But it’s their profession who have created the conditions that exist today for suicidal individuals that are equivalent to the conditions that prevailed over women when divorce was too cruel and evil whereas a husband mercilessly and routinely beating his wife senseless was not so cruel. Their profession is responsible for the minds of the government who are all about oppressing and subjugating suicidal individuals not protecting us.
It’s a false source of truth that is responsible for so much evil and cruelty done to suicidal individuals and so much evil and cruelty of monsters protected than any humane protections for suicidal individuals.
It’s a false sense of truth that doesn’t even recognise there’s cruelty too cruel to do to a suicidal individual and in fact legislates for the protection of the unlimited cruelties that can be done to a suicidal individual as well as legislates for unlimited suffering. As if suicidal individuals cannot ever be abused or tortured endlessly by those who have no sense of remorse or mercy.
This corruption of the scientific method which is fundamental to psychiatry it leads to the corruption of the meaning of words such as vulnerability and “duty of care” to justify whatever evil and cruelty monsters want to do to a suicidal individual but it also defines a sense of cruelty devoid of humane protections for suicidal individuals against unlimited cruelty and unlimited evil and unfettered abuses and torture so the monsters who call themselves the human race are really free to do whatever evil and cruelty that comes into the minds of sadists to want to do to suicidal individuals.
Point 2 – no concept of cruelty is what defines the psychiatric and mental health meaning of things like duty of care
The freedom to force me to live for the monsters who call themselves the human race to keep on making me want to die is protected by a vast system of cruelty.
The false source of truth it leads to what is obviously going to happen when dehumanisation and the misuse of the scientific method to prove sub human status is a scientific truth is going to achieve. There’s absolutely no recognition of the cruelty the monsters who call themselves the human race are doing to me even when I’m suicidal already. Because it’s done out of a misguided sense of care entrenched in the sort of sub human status enforced a millennium ago by the falsehood of the truth of the gods is why divorce is wrong but a husband beating his wife senseless without remorse or mercy is not so cruel or not even cruelty at all. “You have to put her in her place by beating her as much as you do” – that’s the sense of cruelty I face. It’s done out of a sense of care so the cruelty doesn’t matter.
That’s what every single suicidal individual before me and I also face. So much cruelty because there’s no recognition of the cruelty and that’s called care. No protection from cruelty and evil because it’s done out of a sense of dehumanisation. It’s about reducing my being to sub human status so it really doesn’t matter if I recognise just how evil I face and have always faced. My needs and wants and what’s important to me as well as my suffering and suicidality are all there to be ignored because I’m not human I’m sub human – and because all this is done out of a sense of care the cruelty doesn’t matter.
It leads to something so beyond horrifically awful: there’s no cruelty in forcing someone to suffer against their will when it’s done out of a sense of psychiatric and mental health care. Like a millennium ago women were expected to face whatever suffering their husbands decided to force their victims of suffer against their will this is the same cruelty that prevails over suicidal individuals.
Obviously there is care in the acts of forcing someone to live not least because the tyranny of evil disguised as care it has always conferred sub human status to the victims of psychiatry so no such possiblity of education for empowerment of the suicidal mind – it’s worthless to educate we who are sub human. It’s what happened to women when they were deemed to sub human in comparison to men and neither women’s liberty was important nor was educating women.
But you recognise the care. You don’t recognise the cruelty. You don’t recognise the cruelty inherent in the acts of forcing someone to live just like you don’t recognise these acts that are about forcing suffering against one’s will are even more cruel when done to a suicidal individual. You denigrate our minds and you denigrate our suffering as the product of a mental illness so there’s so much cruelty done to suicidal individuals and so much cruelty that’s unlimited and unfettered that can be done to suicidal individuals.
I’m focusing on one clear and present unrecognised cruelty and evil here and that’s the inherent cruelty and evil in the acts of forcing someone to live. You’re forcing suffering against one’s will and this is even more cruel when it’s done to a suicidal individual. Like every other cruelty the law makers succeed in making certain the evils and cruelties that can be done to a suicidal individual are not legislated against so it is unlimited evils and cruelties the law makers legislate for.
It’s very much like the conditions that prevailed over women a millennium ago because of the existence of a false source of truth. So words like vulnerability are corrupted from the meaning of weakness and fragility to instead justify tyranny and oppression and subjugation. And the cruelty isn’t recognised. The meaning of “duty of care” it really does mean “I don’t give a damn about how cruel and evil my methods are I will get whatever I want from you. I don’t give a damn about what you want. I don’t care and your wants and needs and free will. I don’t care about your suffering or your quality of life as I would a free man. I don’t give a damn how cruel or evil you think what I’m doing to you is. I do it because I care about getting whatever I want from you so my cruelty doesn’t matter and you don’t matter. I matter and my decisions matter and I will get whatever I want from you by any method matter how cruel and evil my methods are or the impact on you is. It doesn’t matter how much I force you to suffer against your will because you don’t matter. I matter and my choices matter and it doesn’t matter how much I force you to suffer against your will or your recognition of the cruelty I am doing to you because I care about you. I don’t give a damn about what are wholly unacceptable consequences for you with the power I take over you because you don’t matter but I matter so my choices matter not yours. If I abuse you or if I torture you or if I inflict even more suicidal thoughts and feelings or if I worsen your suicidality it doesn’t matter to me because you don’t matter. I matter so it’s not what’s important to you that matters to me because I care about you”.
Or simply duty of care means “I protect and I gorge on the freedom to make a suicidal individual want to die because I care about you”.
I digress. It’s what duty of care means it means they ignore the cruelty. That’s everything the monsters who call themselves the human race have done well throughout the existence of psychiatry. They’ve ignored the inherent cruelty in the acts of forcing someone to live. Because of a false sense of truth they ignore the inherent cruelty in forcing someone to suffer against one’s will and they don’t – you don’t – recognise such cruelty is even more cruel to do to a suicidal individual because it’s not that we face unlimited suffering already that’s one of the humanised ways to explain why suicidal individuals feel suicidal but the source of truth is the belief that a suicidal mind is defective and incompetent because it’s the product of a defective brain.
(All this makes what an even more invaluable protection without equal…?)
That’s what duty of care represents certainly in my mind. It defines what I trust psychiatrists and the rest of the monsters who call themselves the human race to do and do well. To work towards unlimited suffering and unlimited cruelty then in this pursuit they do succeed in caring about. The competency not just to ignore the cruelty inherent in the act of forcing someone to suffer against their will but to also believe there really is nothing too cruel to do to a suicidal individual and call this care.
I hope this explains the final point which no doubt I’ve communicated poorly when I call it “duty of cruelty”
Point 3 – duty of cruelty
What do you do when you do recognise the cruelty in the acts of forcing someone to live? What do you do when you recognise the vast list of things too cruel to do to a suicidal individual is also part of this point.
This piece is about yet another reason to justify what’s actually care for suicidal individuals but I’m seeking to use a different truth than having the most basic empathy and understanding for the suicidal mind.
It’s the point that’s to recognise the inherent cruelty and evil you do in the name of psychiatric and mental health care and in the name of duty of care.
What do you strive to do and to provide suicidal individuals not because of your sense of care but because you recognise the cruelty you are doing by, for example, the criminalisation of assisted suicide?
This is not the emotional argument rather it’s the rational argument that when you do such cruelty then how do you compensate and counteract the cruelty inherent in the acts of forcing someone to live?
This is poorly expressed by the phrase duty of cruelty but it’s to sum up the objective of reducing and compensating and counteracting the cruelty.
It’s like “we take this from you your right to use your death and in return we give you all of these things such as…?”
It’s the rational thoughts based not on ignoring the cruelty when it’s done out of a misguided sense of care but rather the care that exists when evil eye cruelty is recognised for what it is. It might be justified as a necessary cruelty and evil because a species of monsters born and bred evil can’t do anything else but then it’s to still recognise the cruelty inherent in acts of forcing someone to live that drives the rational will to do everything in the name of reducing and compensating and counteracting the cruelty. EVERYTHING!.
“We can’t bear for you to suffer anymore beyond being forced to live” – it’s a rational thought driven not by empathy for suicidal individuals rather it’s the recognition of the cruelty in the acts of forcing someone to live are still cruel.
“I can’t bear the cruelty in forcing you to live but it’s a necessary evil. But because I can’t bear the cruelty inherent in forcing a suicidal individual to suffer against their will it’s the last cruelty I expect you to face’.
“I take from you what makes your life your life and in return for this I will give you so much”.
“Because I recognise the cruelty I do everything to counteract it. Obviously that’s the protection of the weak to limit the cruelty that can be done to you big I believe there is one cruelty I have to do which is to force you to live. But I recognise just how much this act of cruelty is cruelty so I have to do everything possible to counteract it and obviously I have to protect you even more because I am part of this cruelty”.
The legalisation of assisted suicide is a logical sequitur once the cruelty inherent in the acts of forcing someone to live are recognised for the cruelty they represent thus such cruelty can never be unlimited.
But what I’m saying here is about the lengths you go to achieve what’s as essential to care as you believe the criminalisation of assisted suicide and other acts of forcing someone to live are essential care.
Not by the empathy and understanding for the suicidal mind I’ve clearly utterly failed to give you but by the recognition of the oppression and subjugation of the suicidal mind as being recognised as cruelty as well as recognising the inherent cruelty in the acts of forcing someone to live.
It’s seeing the cruelty for what it is and making duty of cruelty about counteracting and compensating and reducing and limiting cruelty.
It’s about giving things to suicidal individuals – such as the protection against further and worsening of suicidality – because you’re taking from us what makes our lives our lives by the use of force and deprivation of liberty that is how psychiatrists have only succeeded in achieving metaphorical and physical prisons for suicidal individuals.
It’s to evoke the rational response to achieve so much care to counteract the inherent cruelty in forcing someone to live than the emotional argument that I’ve clearly failed to communicate. You recognise it’s a necessary evil and you want to do everything to reduce the impact on the victims of the methods of cruelty and evil.
Point 4 – what’s the impact on me when you can’t even begin to recognise the difference between cruelty and care let alone limit and counteract your evil and cruelty?
Whatever happens to me I have to die. The proof of the truth about human nature and the monsters who call themselves the human race cannot be undone. But it’s so much worse for me when the monsters who call themselves the human race cannot recognise the cruelty they’re doing because it’s done out of a sense of care.
But you’re all blind to your cruelty and that’s the tragedy of every suicidal individual before me and me. Because you have the wrong source of truth you have the wrong methods and wrong objectives. But that aside you really don’t try to limit or counteract or in any other way provide so so much more for suicidal individuals to protect and save suicidal individuals because you recognise the cruelty inherent in the acts of forcing someone to live.
You must recognise the consequences of what’s so cruel and too cruel to do to me it’s not been recognised and that’s the proof I have of human nature. So I’m not fighting for the life I deserve. I’m fighting for the death I deserve. You don’t have the most basic empathy and understanding for my being. So you can’t recognise the difference between care and cruelty. But you don’t have the empathy to care about the impact on me of what you think you do because you care about me. You never have had before in the history of the monsters who call themselves the human race when it comes to mental suffering and mental diversity.
You do have the belief that I’m here to be hurt and harmed and abused and tortured endlessly and that’s a sense of cruelty married to not recognise the cruelty and the erroneous belief that if you do it out of a sense of care then the cruelty inherent in your acts of oppression and subjugation and dehumanisation is either there to be ignored or you don’t recognise the cruelty at all.
So what I face is the corrupted meaning of duty of care. Without recognising the cruelty and with no sense whatsoever of duty of cruelty.
Thus I fight for the death I deserve not the life I deserve. You take from me what makes my life my life but you cannot take away from me the proof of the truth about human nature.
I know too much about the truth you really don’t give a damn about how I feel or am going to feel even when I’m suicidal already. That’s what you give me in return for taking from me what makes my life my life.
Duty of cruelty serves to achieve one sense of care if no other. “Forcing you to live is the last cruelty I expect you to face’ and that’s how you save and beat the value of assisted suicide.
But your source of truth is a lie. So what’s duty of care? “I protect the freedom to make a suicidal individual want to die and I will gorge on this freedom and that’s not cruelty it’s care”.
I do trust you and your kind to prove the protection of assisted suicide is even more invaluable and without equal. Do you recognise the lines that cannot be crossed when the competency of the minds of monsters is the competency to believe that divorce is what’s too cruel and evil but a wife routinely beaten by her husband that’s not too cruel?
You know I recognise the lines that cannot be crossed and that’s why I fight for the death I deserve not the life I deserve and you recognise I can’t trust you to recognise the lines I know cannot be crossed. Like the impact on a wife routinely beaten by her husband a millennium ago you have the same thing for suicidal individuals the complete and utter regard for how suicidal individuals feel. You don’t try to protect and save and beat the value of assisted suicide. You take liberty and protect unlimited cruelty and evil.
a thing that defines the competency to care 