There’s certainly a dichotomy between minds that use one’s death and kill without consent versus the suicidal mind and the act of assisted suicide that’s only about the death of his individual by consent.
I’m talking about those who were not prejudiced against by Christians and other religions in the same way suicidal individuals are prejudiced against.
I’m talking about the minds of soldiers and war makers versus the minds of suicidal individuals.
Governments are happy to accept the decisions of soldiers to serve. They happily accept the choice to be killed and to kill without consent of soldiers (and sailors and pilots). Because their minds aren’t prejudiced against like the suicidal mind is. Psychiatry has much in common with perpetuating religious and cultural prejudices so while the minds of soldiers and war makers are flawless by the standards of psychiatrists the suicidal mind is oppressed by psychiatrists.
Both types of mind choose to use one’s death. But the minds of soldiers choose to kill without consent and the minds of war makers (in this civilisation of monsters I’m talking about the minds of the government) choose to mass murder without consent.
Certainly war and the methods of war are about sanctioned mass murder without consent. They’re quite capable of sanctioning mass murder without consent. No Christian prejudices against this existed or the minds who do this so by the standards of psychiatrists such minds are flawless. The minds of soldiers and war makers are not mentally ill by the standards of psychiatrists. It’s minds that are obviously risk to self and others but the way the mental health laws work is by the prejudice against the mentally ill and the victims of psychiatry.
I’m not arguing about the need for protections that barrier access to assisted suicide here. I’m talking about the difference between the minds of soldiers and suicidal individuals. I’m also taking about the difference between minds who sanction mass murder without consent and those who save suicidal individuals by assisted suicide. I see no difference in the nature of the mind or the quality of the mind.
As I’ve done in other ways I’m attacking the source of truth.
Those who are not prejudiced against by religious and cultural prejudices have minds that are flawless by the standards of psychiatrists even though such minds are far greater risk to self and others than the minds of suicidal individuals or the minds who perform assisted suicide. War makers and soldiers kill without consent and mass murder without consent but those who find it hard to legalise assisted suicide find it easy to sanction mass murder without consent.
The minds of the monsters who govern seem to believe there’s nothing worth using one’s death for when it comes to suicidal individuals yet they choose to sanction mass murder without consent.
“I can’t bear the legalisation of assisted suicide but I can sanction mass murder without consent in the Falklands war and the gulf war and so on…” I see the commonality of the things worse than death that competent minds have. They don’t believe “it might get better eventually at some point eventually so deaths are not warranted” when it comes to sanctioned mass murder without consent. They see a line that cannot be allowed to be crossed and it’s worth the choices to use one’s death as well as to kill without consent to draw this line in concrete. They also happily accept the choices of soldiers to use one’s death and to kill without consent.
But the suicidal mind is dehumanised by psychiatrists. It is automatically assumed to be a defective brain and thus an incompetent mind. It’s a very specific form of dehumanisation. Suicidal individuals are not weak and fragile and sensitive instead we’re mentally ill. Our thoughts and feelings and beings are the product of a brain defect. Thus our pain, our consent, free will, what’s important to us is there to be ignored because we’re less than human.
This is what defines the criminalisation of assisted suicide and every other law that affects suicidal individuals. Dehumanisation.
So what is a life like when our pain, our consent, free will, what’s important to us is there to be ignored. We are victims of tyranny and oppression and subjugation. The very things worse than death that many many war makers have sanctioned mass murder without consent for to draw a line against that cannot be crossed.
I am against the methods of war but I also recognise they are necessary because the human race are a species of monsters born and bred evil. Law makers and governments recognise this truth so they have military forces.
I do believe “give me liberty or give me death” is a valid and necessary choice as much as I believe “give me liberty and give me a good death” is equally valid and necessary. The former is a phrase used in the liberation of peoples and countries. It’s throughout history and it echos “let my people go” that’s another expression of liberation.
You can watch films like Braveheart or The Last Samurai or look at the history of liberation served by the methods of war. It is worth dying for liberty for anyone who has the competency to recognise what’s worse than death. You live free because of this competency whereas suicidal individuals don’t live free because psychiatrists have no competency to recognise the truth about human nature.
There is no competency to recognise the truth about human nature in the medicalisation of suicide but there is the tyranny and oppression and subjugation that’s obviously worse than death to every mind who died for liberty and liberation of peoples and liberation of countries and equality and democracy to draw a line in concrete that cannot be crossed.
Almost never is it “things might get better eventually at some point so it’s not worth using one’s death” that’s led to the liberation of peoples and countries. No tyranny has ever been ended or protected against by such a sense of apathy
We hold these truths to be self evident but there’s no truth in the medicalisation of suicide. You live free because of minds who have the same quality as the suicidal mind to recognise what is worse than death for what it is.
You never want to need the protection of assisted suicide but you need it to be there to protect you when you need it. It is a protection without equal.
I can’t think about the protections that barrier access to assisted suicide because the monsters who call themselves the human race have demonstrated so clearly I have always needed this protection to stop them. Any deprivation of liberty between decision and death is only more opportunities for the evil of a species of monsters born and bred evil to shine so evilly over a suicidal individual.
But their evil shines so evilly. It’s obviously going to make me want to die even more to be denied my death to be a slave to the proof of the truth about human nature. They only serve their self interests by denying me the protection of my death.
a thing that defines the competency to care 