“The more I force on you you’d never choose the more you should feel cared about” – that’s the understanding of pain and truth that’s the best psychiatrists have ever achieved. And when a victim of psychiatry recognises the evil the tyranny of evil believes such recognition of evil is caused by a brain defect and part of the disease. When you’re all evil and only evil you see care in this and no evil.

If what you force on me was physical pain then you’d stand in harms way.

The medicalisation of suicide only serves and protects the self interests of monsters.

My life was ruined before it started. I was always destined to spend so much of my lifetime feeling suicidal because I live without the most basic empathy and understanding for my being to protect me.

You don’t recognise when I’ve suffered too much already. You don’t have such a concept to protect suicidal individuals. Or any other concept of the protection of the weak. This is what comes from the same sense of cruelty as the criminalisation of assisted suicide that’s cursed my life to be better off having never been born. The evil at the cores of the monsters who call themselves the human race defines their choices in their self interests and the proof that a species of monsters born and bred evil can’t do anything else.

(Suicidality = suicidal suffering, feelings and thoughts)

They are utterly unaffected by how suicidal individuals feel so instead of making suicidality avoidable at every opportunity they really do care about the abuses and torments and tortures of suicidal individuals. When it’s within their power to make suicidality avoidable they choose not to – but this is the best the monsters who call themselves the human race have ever achieved in the name of care for suicidal individuals.

It is barbaric savagery. The criminalisation of assisted suicide is the logical progression of never wanting to make suicidality avoidable. This is so cruel but the monsters who call themselves the human race see no cruelty too cruel to do to a suicidal individual in the centuries they’ve tried to care about suicidal individuals.

It typifies the tragedies of my existence that they cannot recognise the difference between cruelty and care. They see no evil in horrific brutalities done to me and instead they see care.

Having a sense of empathy for suicidal individuals is not possible. That’s why no such concept of empathy such as recognising a suicidal individual has suffered too much already when we become suicidal it does exist. Without this concept suicidal individuals only face even more cruelty and evil.

So when it is obvious I can’t bear the pain of living they ignore my pain in their self interests. So they happily make it even worse than death.

Instead of feeling for suicidal individuals the monsters who call themselves the human race have the medicalisation of suicide and the fallacy of mental illness. It defines the cruelty in the acceptability of suicidality as an acceptable consequence. It’s the opposite of care and it’s the opposite of the self interests of suicidal individuals but a species of monsters born and bred evil can’t do anything else but ignore the severity of the suffering of suicidal individuals and the awfulness of feeling suicidal.

They don’t have a basis of truth or empathy as a basis for care. Instead they have what doctors have believed in which is that suicidality is the product of a brain defect. Feeling suicidal is an abnormal aberrations and it’s caused by a mental illness – but this is the best they’ve ever had as a basis for care for centuries. It is the oppression and subjugation of suicidal individuals based on having zero empathy for suicidal individuals that defines the products of the medicalisation of suicide and the products are infinite cruelty and evil.

It’s such a curse to be born because of this as well as the rest of the evils done to me because they have no basic empathy and understanding for my being to protect me.

I am focusing on my suicidality because it’s the truth about a life theirs to make even worse than death. The previous sentence I don’t think you can comphrend how horrific it is to face this truth like I do and like I am expected to face and survive and cope with.

Volition + to escape cruelty and the proof of the truth about human nature and why it’s why it’s endless. A species of monsters born and bred evil can’t do anything else to suicidal individuals because there’s only evil at their cores and no heart to stop them – but they are the things worse than death.

I weigh how my free will is there to be ignored like my pain is.

I think if you are deluded like I was that the human race are good then you won’t understand why you want the protection of assisted suicide to be there for you when you need it. If you recognise the truth about human nature then you recognise why you need the protection of assisted suicide against their unlimited cruelties and evils. This generation of the monsters who call themselves the human race are still unaffected by how suicidal individuals feel.

You never want to face “the only shelter from your cruelty is my death” but when you do you’ll recognise why assisted suicide is never a crime.

This is a preamble to thinking about the volition of suicidal individuals. Free will, freedom, liberty, choices. These are all ignored in the medicalisation of suicide.

Firstly the decision to die is natural and natural and normal. This is a fundamentally different basis for care than the medicalisation of suicide.

From what I’ve seen in the assisted suicide debate it’s so important the choices of doctors. For example – specifically in the efforts to legalise assisted suicide for one reason to die alone – doctors judge when someone is terminally ill instead of the suicidal individual judging when pain, quality of life and the evil they face is worth using one’s death to escape from. Instead of the individual defining what is worse than death and worth using one’s death for it’s about medical expertise and decisions.

Elsewhere I’ve written about how the medical profession – a profession of monsters – have completely failed their duty of expertise. They’ve cursed me to be better off having never been born because their basis for care is a fallacy and they are so unaffected by how suicidal individuals feel that they represent the acceptability of suicidality as acceptable consequences – but this is the opposite of a basis for care. You can read more in other posts here.

Here I want to write about volition and cruelty.

It’s how assisted suicide is different to murder and mass murder without consent. Like many laws and legal precedents part of the cruelty of a crime is being done against free will and against consent. When you need to use your death for whatever reason you look forward to assisted suicide. You don’t look forward to being murdered because it’s a cruelty and evil done against consent but assisted suicide is about free will and volition and liberty. It’s cruelty to be completely denied any hope of access to assisted suicide that has the element of cruelty in crimes.

You look at a mixed martial arts fight. It’s something you’ll never consent to to face such violence and pain and injury. But mixed martial artists consent to it so it’s not a crime. If you were forced into a mixed martial arts fight then this would be a crime.

When you consider wars they’re about governments sanctioned mass murder without consent. They’re able to sanction mass murder without consent and have arsenals of nuclear weapons with single munitions capable of killing hundreds of thousands if not millions without consent. But this is not thought to be a crime when the methods of war are sanctioned.

Assisted suicide it involves death but it’s not the cruelty of murder or mass murder. It is the choice of a suicidal individual in our self interests. It is a hard choice but a necessary one because there are things worse than death.

It’s in no one’s self interests to become suicidal and stay suicidal. It’s not something chosen. It is not a consented thing to become suicidal and stay suicidal. This is the foundation of care based on the unacceptably of suicidality.

It’s a very different basis to the medicalisation of suicide. This is all about oppressing and subjugating suicidal individuals. It’s a tyranny of evil most obviously evil because it’s based on the acceptability of suicidality – but this is what no suicidal individual wants. The acceptablility of suicidality is the opposite of what suicidal individuals want and it’s not in the self interests of anyone who has the capacity to feel to ever face anything based on the acceptability of suicidality.

What the medicalisation of suicide represents is ignoring pain and consent and volition – because suicidality is caused by a brain defect according to the medical suicide experts. Doctors rule over suicidal individuals because they’re treating an illness and an illness is a biological defect – that’s the basis of so much cruelty and evil done to every suicidal individual.

The acceptablility of suicidality as a basis for care – but that’s the best the monsters who call themselves the human race can do. To ignore pain and consent and free will in the name of care is the best the monsters who call themselves the human race have ever achieved. By ignoring pain and consent the medical suicide experts are responsible for the deaths of so many suicidal individuals. By ignoring pain and consent they commit crimes but the crimes are not recognised in a civilisation of monsters born and bred evil.

The majesty of the evil in the medicalisation of suicide is to disregard any cruelty and evil when it’s done to a suicidal individual. This is not in the self interests of suicidal individuals but it is in the self interests of monsters who want to be free to abuse and torment and torture suicidal individuals. It comes so naturally to the monsters who call themselves the human race to want to do this to suicidal individuals.

The specific evil I am talking about are the acts of forcing someone to live that are the acts of forcing someone to suffer and endure against one’s will. I recognise a degree of this is necessary and in the self interests of suicidal individuals nonetheless it’s still cruelty. This is quite different to the medical approach which really is to believe there’s absolutely nothing too cruel to do to a suicidal individual and cruelty should be disregarded when it’s done to a suicidal individual. Their competency is to protect things like the freedom to make a suicidal individual want to die – this is only in the self interests of monsters not in the self interests of suicidal individuals but the medicalisation of suicide is entrenched in ignoring pain and consent and free will. It is an oppressive sense of cruelty but it’s the best the monsters who call themselves the human race can do. A species of monsters born and bred evil can’t do anything else.

It’s the care of “so what if we make a suicidal individual want to die even more’ but what else can they do when they only have the barbaric brutality of savages and that’s what defines the acceptability of suicidality as an acceptable consequence. It’s not in the self interests of suicidal individuals.

This only leads to so many crimes done to suicidal individuals but they’re not crimes in this civilisation of monsters because the medical profession have succeeded so much in dehumanising suicidal individuals. Their tyranny of evil ignores pain and consent and free will so there are no crimes against suicidal individuals. Instead the freedom to inflict, prolong and worsen suicidality indefinitely is a basis for care and it’s responsible for the deaths of most if not all suicidal individuals. The freedom to abuse and torment and torture suicidal individuals is the most a species of monsters born and bred evil has cared about protecting instead of protecting suicidal individuals.

The medical suicide experts have succeeded in ignoring any cruelty done to a suicidal individual and that’s the best a species of monsters born and bred evil has ever achieved. Even the method of imprisonment – punishment – the medical suicide experts believe is no longer cruel when it’s done to a suicidal individual. It is the deliberate act of ruining quality of life and depriving liberty as a punishment but the medical profession believes it’s no longer cruel when it’s done to a suicidal individual. And the rest of the monsters who call themselves the human race see no evil in this instead they see care. So they don’t even try to counteract the evil of a necessary evil because they see care and no evil.

Throughout the existence of psychiatry there are many victims of psychiatry who recognise all of this is simply too cruel and evil. Remember back at the top of this piece I said you never want to face “the only shelter from your cruelty is my death” but when you do you’ll recognise why assisted suicide is never a crime.

There’s a point you never want to face and that’s cruelty worse than death. There are so many things worse than death and one of them is facing evil and cruelty worse than death.

The medicalisation of suicide leads to this point. It’s devoid of any concept of what’s too cruel to do to a suicidal individual. It doesn’t protect suicidal individuals how the weak are meant to be protected and instead it oppresses the weak.

The acts of forcing someone to live are inherently cruel and evil because they are the acts of forcing someone to suffer and endure against one’s will. They’re obviously cruel because they force suicidal individuals to face the very things we can’t live through and choose to die to escape from.

Ordinary pain is bad. Being forced to suffer and endure against one’s will is even worse. There’s a point when being forced to suffer against your will and against your will is worse than death and this is orders of magnitude greater than ordinary pain and being forced to suffer ordinary pain.

The acts of forcing someone to live are obviously more cruel and while they’re necessary to a degree they’re still great cruelties and evils. They’re acts of cruelty far worse than the prevention against being forced to suffer and endure against one’s will that are crimes legislated against in countless laws and legal precedents. This evil and cruelty is in no way recognised in the medicalisation of suicide.

Then everything else from the medicalisation of suicide is about ignoring the cruelty when it’s done to a suicidal individual and having absolutely no concept of what’s too cruel to do to a suicidal individual. The medical suicide experts are happy to protect and gorge on things like the freedom to make a suicidal individual want to die and the freedom to inflict, prolong and worsen suicidality indefinitely and the freedom to abuse and torment and torture suicidal individuals. They only care about oppressing suicidal individuals and the self interests of monsters that are defined by such freedoms.

All in the name of ignoring pain and consent and free will – that’s why the acceptability of suicidality as an acceptable consequence is a basis for care. This inexorably leads to suicidal individuals facing even more cruelty and evil than in the acts of being forced to live.

To top it all off they want to take the cruelty in being forced to suffer and endure against one’s will even more suicidal thoughts and feelings and want to make it unlimited – this is the cruelty in the criminalisation of assisted suicide. A species of monsters born and bred evil sees care in all of this and no cruelty. Thus so much unlimited evil and cruelty prevails over suicidal individuals in a civilisation of monsters born and bred evil. What are crimes too awful to do to suicidal individuals for anyone who has a heart to stop them instead the medicalisation of suicide protects what monsters want to do to suicidal individuals.

But I digress….

The point I was trying to make is simply about using one’s death for you never want to face “the only shelter from your cruelty is my death” but when you do you’ll recognise why assisted suicide is never a crime. For the cruelty and harms worse than death you want the protection of assisted suicide to be there to protect you.

Once assisted suicide is legalised there will be protections that barrier access to assisted suicide. But there’s a reason to die that’s to escape from the unlimited cruelties and evils of the monsters who call themselves the human race.

For the truth about human nature assisted suicide is never a crime for this reason to use one’s death alone.

But for such reasons to die and because it’s abundantly clear the monsters who call themselves the human race have no competency to recognise their evil and cruelty except to perfect it by denying the protection of assisted suicide this is not just why assisted suicide must be legal but why it has to be in the power of the individual to choose access to assisted suicide without validation from the external observer or assessor.

It’s like expecting slave owners to assess cruelty. There’s no point because their evil will only shine so evilly over a suicidal individual. When you face what you never want to face “the only shelter from your cruelty is my death” you’ll understand that any assessor is part of the cruelty the monsters who call themselves the human race can’t recognise for the cruelty it is. Any deprivation of liberty between decision and death is only more opportunities for the evil of a species of monsters born and bred evil to shine more evilly over a suicidal individual – to further the proof of “the only shelter from your cruelty is my death”.

This is all about the truth about human nature and from what I’ve seen there’s no recognition of the truth about human nature in anything based on the medicalisation of suicide. I have not seen the pain recognised but I’ve also never seen the cruelty recognised so the use of the protection of assisted suicide against unlimited cruelties and evils isn’t part of the assisted suicide debate.

The reason to die to escape from the evil at the cores of the monsters who call themselves the human race is another reason why assisted suicide is a protection without equal and who in this civilisation of monsters born and bred evil has the competency to recognise the truth about human nature to have the competency to assess the reason to die for “the only shelter from your cruelty is my death” but the suicidal individual? Look at how the monsters who call themselves the human race see no evil too evil to do to a suicidal individual as a basis for care. Look at how competent the best of the monsters who call themselves the human race at caring about suicidal individuals are at disregarding any cruelty and evil when it’s done to a suicidal individual. Look at the dearth of humane protections because of the acceptability of suicidality as an acceptable consequence that’s only in the self interests of monsters. Having absolutely no concept of what’s too cruel to do to a suicidal individual is the best a species of monsters born and bred evil has ever achieved in the name of care for… for who? In whose self interests is having absolutely no concept of what’s too cruel to do to a suicidal individual and that’s why there are no humane protections not even assisted suicide?

Only the victim can recognise the cruelty and the monsters who call themselves the human race can’t. That’s what causes the reason to die “the only shelter from your cruelty is my death” but then they see no cruelty in the acts of forcing someone to live that are exactly the cruelty in being forced to suffer and endure against one’s will.

To save and protect the victim of “the only shelter from your cruelty is my death” when it’s obvious to the victim the monsters who call themselves the human race have no competency to have a heart to stop them access to assisted suicide must be as much as possible in the hands of the victim to decide.

Other reasons to die may warrant greater protections that barrier access to assisted suicide but once the monsters who call themselves the human race have demonstrated their will to want to achieve the unlimited evil and cruelty that leads to “the only shelter from your cruelty is my death” then there needs to be considerably less deprivation of liberty between decision and death because any deprivation of liberty is only there for the evil of a species of monsters born and bred evil to shine more evilly over a suicidal individual. And the point of any assessment and external validation of the decision to die is worthless because just look at it what the best of the monsters who call themselves the human race at caring about suicidal individuals do in the name of care. They have not even the most basic empathy and understanding for suicidal individuals and they’re the best of you at caring about suicidal individuals. They oppress suicidal individuals instead of protect the weak – but that’s the best the monsters who call themselves the human race have ever achieved in the name of…what? Only in the name of ignoring the pain of suicidal individuals, ignoring our consent and free will, ignoring what’s important to us and in the name of “so what if we make it even worse than death”. But the monsters who call themselves the human race see care in this and no evil.

So the reason to use one’s death to escape from the evil and cruelty of the monsters who call themselves the human race is one that requires the least deprivation of liberty between decision and death and no external validation of the decision to die. To expect the monsters who call themselves the human race to recognise cruelty for what it is is futile and any deprivation of liberty is only more opportunities for their evil to shine even more evilly over a suicidal individual.

I’m trying to think of a way to make you understand that expecting the monsters who call themselves the human race to recognise the evil and cruelty they want to do to a suicidal individual is evil and cruelty. It’s like expecting monsters to care about this suicidal individual instead of their self interests. It’s like expecting monsters to recognise evil and harms too great to do to me. It’s hopeless and futile because they are the monsters who call themselves the human race by name and by nature. It’s like expecting slave owners to assess the reason to die to escape from slavery – to assess “the only shelter from your cruelty is my death” expressed by a victim of slavery. It’s hopeless. The monsters who call themselves the human race have absolutely no concept of what’s too cruel to do to a suicidal as a basis for care. Any deprivation of liberty between decision and death is only more opportunities for their evil to shine more evilly over a suicidal individual. Any assessment is by those who have never done anything else but protect the self interests of monsters and the unlimited cruelties and evils the monsters who call themselves the human race care so much about doing to suicidal individuals – but it’s the self interests of monsters to achieve the most harms worse than death possible defines the criminalisation of assisted suicide.

I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again. I can only fight for the legalisation of assisted suicide because I see the rewards and I see the personal risks for me not the personal risks for others. My scope and the scope of my job was primarily the legalisation of assisted suicide but I’ve found the need for other humane protections for the weak. I would probably argue against protections that barrier access to assisted suicide because every bit of deprivation of liberty and force is only more opportunities for the evil of a species of monsters born and bred evil to shine so evilly over a suicidal individual.

There’s certainly a dichotomy between minds that use one’s death and kill without consent versus the suicidal mind and the act of assisted suicide that’s only about the death of his individual by consent.

I’m talking about those who were not prejudiced against by Christians and other religions in the same way suicidal individuals are prejudiced against.

I’m talking about the minds of soldiers and war makers versus the minds of suicidal individuals.

Governments are happy to accept the decisions of soldiers to serve. They happily accept the choice to be killed and to kill without consent of soldiers (and sailors and pilots). Because their minds aren’t prejudiced against like the suicidal mind is. Psychiatry has much in common with perpetuating religious and cultural prejudices so while the minds of soldiers and war makers are flawless by the standards of psychiatrists the suicidal mind is oppressed by psychiatrists.

Both types of mind choose to use one’s death. But the minds of soldiers choose to kill without consent and the minds of war makers (in this civilisation of monsters I’m talking about the minds of the government) choose to mass murder without consent.

Certainly war and the methods of war are about sanctioned mass murder without consent. They’re quite capable of sanctioning mass murder without consent. No Christian prejudices against this existed or the minds who do this so by the standards of psychiatrists such minds are flawless. The minds of soldiers and war makers are not mentally ill by the standards of psychiatrists. It’s minds that are obviously risk to self and others but the way the mental health laws work is by the prejudice against the mentally ill and the victims of psychiatry.

I’m not arguing about the need for protections that barrier access to assisted suicide here. I’m talking about the difference between the minds of soldiers and suicidal individuals. I’m also taking about the difference between minds who sanction mass murder without consent and those who save suicidal individuals by assisted suicide. I see no difference in the nature of the mind or the quality of the mind.

As I’ve done in other ways I’m attacking the source of truth.

Those who are not prejudiced against by religious and cultural prejudices have minds that are flawless by the standards of psychiatrists even though such minds are far greater risk to self and others than the minds of suicidal individuals or the minds who perform assisted suicide. War makers and soldiers kill without consent and mass murder without consent but those who find it hard to legalise assisted suicide find it easy to sanction mass murder without consent.

The minds of the monsters who govern seem to believe there’s nothing worth using one’s death for when it comes to suicidal individuals yet they choose to sanction mass murder without consent.

“I can’t bear the legalisation of assisted suicide but I can sanction mass murder without consent in the Falklands war and the gulf war and so on…” I see the commonality of the things worse than death that competent minds have. They don’t believe “it might get better eventually at some point eventually so deaths are not warranted” when it comes to sanctioned mass murder without consent. They see a line that cannot be allowed to be crossed and it’s worth the choices to use one’s death as well as to kill without consent to draw this line in concrete. They also happily accept the choices of soldiers to use one’s death and to kill without consent.

But the suicidal mind is dehumanised by psychiatrists. It is automatically assumed to be a defective brain and thus an incompetent mind. It’s a very specific form of dehumanisation. Suicidal individuals are not weak and fragile and sensitive instead we’re mentally ill. Our thoughts and feelings and beings are the product of a brain defect. Thus our pain, our consent, free will, what’s important to us is there to be ignored because we’re less than human.

This is what defines the criminalisation of assisted suicide and every other law that affects suicidal individuals. Dehumanisation.

So what is a life like when our pain, our consent, free will, what’s important to us is there to be ignored. We are victims of tyranny and oppression and subjugation. The very things worse than death that many many war makers have sanctioned mass murder without consent for to draw a line against that cannot be crossed.

I am against the methods of war but I also recognise they are necessary because the human race are a species of monsters born and bred evil. Law makers and governments recognise this truth so they have military forces.

I do believe “give me liberty or give me death” is a valid and necessary choice as much as I believe “give me liberty and give me a good death” is equally valid and necessary. The former is a phrase used in the liberation of peoples and countries. It’s throughout history and it echos “let my people go” that’s another expression of liberation.

You can watch films like Braveheart or The Last Samurai or look at the history of liberation served by the methods of war. It is worth dying for liberty for anyone who has the competency to recognise what’s worse than death. You live free because of this competency whereas suicidal individuals don’t live free because psychiatrists have no competency to recognise the truth about human nature.

There is no competency to recognise the truth about human nature in the medicalisation of suicide but there is the tyranny and oppression and subjugation that’s obviously worse than death to every mind who died for liberty and liberation of peoples and liberation of countries and equality and democracy to draw a line in concrete that cannot be crossed.

Almost never is it “things might get better eventually at some point so it’s not worth using one’s death” that’s led to the liberation of peoples and countries. No tyranny has ever been ended or protected against by such a sense of apathy

We hold these truths to be self evident but there’s no truth in the medicalisation of suicide. You live free because of minds who have the same quality as the suicidal mind to recognise what is worse than death for what it is.

You never want to need the protection of assisted suicide but you need it to be there to protect you when you need it. It is a protection without equal.

I can’t think about the protections that barrier access to assisted suicide because the monsters who call themselves the human race have demonstrated so clearly I have always needed this protection to stop them. Any deprivation of liberty between decision and death is only more opportunities for the evil of a species of monsters born and bred evil to shine so evilly over a suicidal individual.

But their evil shines so evilly. It’s obviously going to make me want to die even more to be denied my death to be a slave to the proof of the truth about human nature. They only serve their self interests by denying me the protection of my death.

A sense of cruelty such as the acceptability of suicidality as acceptable consequences curses everyone who has the capacity to feel. You will be glad you never need the protection of assisted suicide but you should understand why you want this protection to be there when you need it.

The problem is I keep on feeling suicidal and being made to feel suicidal. Such are the things that are in the self interests of the monsters who call themselves the human race but not in my self interests.

There are so many tragedies of my existence and the acceptability of suicidality as an acceptable consequence is one of them. It is purely for the self interests of monsters that’s why suicidality is an acceptable consequence in a way no different to when domestic abuse was an acceptable consequence.

It marks my life as better having never been born. Because my competency to recognise the things worse than death is so well informed through so many personal experiences of a life lived without the most basic empathy and understanding for my being to protect me.

The acceptablility of suicidality leads to such freedoms such as the freedom to make a suicidal individual want to die protected by the criminalisation of assisted suicide and the freedom to inflict, prolong and worsen suicidality indefinitely protected by the criminalisation of assisted suicide. This is the opposite of care but this is the best the monsters who call themselves the human race have ever achieved in the name of care for suicidal individuals. The freedom to abuse and torment and torture suicidal individuals is the opposite of care. It is clearly evil but the monsters who call themselves the human race see care in this.

Do you recognise this truth? The monsters who call themselves the human race can’t recognise the difference between cruelty and care – certainly not in the medicalised suicide system and suicide laws. The dearth of humane protections only makes the protection of assisted suicide even more invaluable. Because doctors oppress the weak instead of protecting the weak.

You’re blessed to not be victim to the acceptability of suicidality as an acceptable consequence and always an acceptable consequence. But if you have the truth about human nature and the capacity for extraordinary cruelty and evil then you recognise why you want the protection of assisted suicide to be there for you.

The assumption that the human race have anything humane that’s innate to human nature is clearly erroneous. The history of the abuses routinely done to suicidal individuals throughout history and even in the centuries the monsters who call themselves the human race have tried to care about suicidal individuals is proof enough that there is absolutely nothing humane that’s innate to human nature. You see care in brutal barbaric savagery but that’s exactly what the medicalisation of suicide is.

The medicalisation of suicide has achieved the opposite of care. It features no humane protections for the weak and instead it’s most about oppressing suicidal individuals. So much cruelty is acceptable to be done to suicidal individuals and the freedom and self interests of monsters are well protected while we’re denied freedom and liberty and rights.

It’s only cruelty that’s going to be achieved when the acceptability of suicidality is a basis for care – but this is the truth about the medicalisation of suicide.

There are no humane protections or sense of remorse or mercy. So much evil and cruelty is done to suicidal individuals. You can’t recognise the extent of the wholly unacceptable evils and cruelties and harms routinely done to suicidal individuals but I do.

The objectives of the medicalisation of suicide is to leave suicidal individuals wholly unprotected and undefended because it’s based on the absolute worst thing and that’s the acceptability of suicidality.

This brutal barbaric savagery will be recognised as the opposite of care perhaps centuries and millennia into the future. But I recognise it now.

It’s done by ignoring pain and consent. It’s done in the name of the self interests of monsters because it is in no suicidal individual’s self interests to be victim to the acceptablility of suicidality. It’s things like the freedom to inflict, prolong and worsen suicidality indefinitely protected by the criminalisation of assisted suicide that are only in the self interests of monsters.

You have to recognise the truth about human nature and you have to have the competency to recognise why your death is not the worst thing that can happen to you. You don’t know just how cruel and evil the monsters who call themselves the human race are to suicidal individuals in this generation of the monsters who call themselves the human race but I do.

You have to look throughout history to see the things worse than death but I don’t. I see them still happening to me now in the present. I’m clearly victim to the acceptability of suicidality as an acceptable consequence and always an acceptable consequence. Made a slave to human evil by being denied the only protection I’ve ever had against the acceptablility of my suicidality.

“So what if we force him to live to keep on making him want to die” – who sees care in this. But it’s a sense of evil that’s always existed even when the monsters who call themselves the human race try to care about suicidal individuals. The acceptability of suicidality is the truth about the medicalisation of suicide and it is savagery. The proof of the truth that there’s nothing humane that’s innate to human nature is endless.

“So what if we the monsters who call themselves the human race force suicidal individuals to live to keep on making them want to die” – even the law makers see care in this and no evil. A species of monsters born and bred evil can’t do anything else.

Instead of the rule of the heart you have no heart to guide you to recognise “I can’t bear him to feel suicidal ever” you have the acceptability of suicidality. It defines everyone who sees care where there’s evil and pure evil.

The acceptability of suicidality is no different to anything else that’s in the self interests of monsters such as the acceptability of slavery and ownership. This basis for care is only a basis for brutal barbaric savagery. To make pain and cruelty unlimited these are the purposes of denying access to assisted suicide but the monsters who call themselves the human race see care in the acceptablility of suicidality as an acceptable consequence and always an acceptable consequence. They really do have absolutely no concept of what’s too cruel to do to a suicidal individual because of this the best of them who care about suicidal individuals see mental illness and brain defects instead of feeling for suicidal individuals. Any feelings for suicidal individuals defines but one of the rules of the heart which is “I can’t bear him to feel suicidal ever”. A state of mental pain there to be prevented but instead a species of monsters born and bred evil wants to make it as unlimited as possible – that’s the care of the self interests of monsters in the criminalisation of assisted suicide and everything else in the medicalisation of suicide.

The wings of angels have never protected suicidal individuals. There’s only the monsters here so care is pathetic but cruelty is unlimited

It takes minds of extraordinary evil to disregard the evil and cruelty when it’s done to a suicidal individual. Versus ordinary evils and cruelties are more evil and cruel when done to a suicidal individual.

If any good came from the medicalisation of suicide then the idea of a cast that protects a broken bone would be metaphorical applied to the protection of suicidal individuals. They don’t protect a broken will to live and instead are happy to abuse it and give the rest of the monsters who call themselves the human race their freedom to abuse an already broken will to live. This is the opposite of care just like the criminalisation of assisted suicide is the opposite of care.

What’s the will to live? You’ll know what it is once it’s taken. It’s something quite tangible to me. It’s what is taken from a suicidal individual and destroyed when a suicidal individual becomes suicidal.

A cast to help a broken bone to heal – it’s really any justification for the protection of suicidal individuals but throughout the existence of psychiatry such will has never existed. The medical suicide experts risk making a suicidal individual want to die even more without hesitation or qualms. They’re the doctors who don’t protect a broken bone and instead abuse it and break more bones. All that exists is the cruelty and evil of monsters.

Having the most basic empathy for suicidal individuals leads to a different approach. Recognising we face what’s worse than death leads to a humane suicide system and suicide laws. It’s already worse than death so ordinary hurts and harms are far worse when done to a suicidal individual – this is how to save and protect. It is what you want when you are suicidal already that everything is done to prevent it getting any worse, from getting more suicidal feelings and worsening of suicidality and more reasons to die.

But what doctors believe in is the cruelty and evil should be disregarded when it’s done to suicidal individuals. For example they use imprisonment which is a deliberate act of ruining quality of life and it obviously is cruelty but they see no cruelty too cruel to do to a suicidal individual.

They’ve done the absolute worst thing. They believe the acts of forcing someone to suffer and endure against one’s will are no longer cruel when they’re done to a suicidal individual. The truth from the most basic empathy for suicidal individuals is the acts of forcing someone to suffer and endure against one’s will even more suicidal thoughts and feelings are more cruel. I’m talking about all the acts of forcing someone to live here.

Don’t get me wrong. They’re still necessary acts of cruelty. I do believe it is necessary to force suicidal individuals to live to a degree but it’s still cruelty and evil and this has to be recognised for what it is instead of what doctors do which is to believe the cruelty and evil should be ignored when it’s done to a suicidal individual. They really don’t care.

There are many laws and legal precedents bases on protecting the weak from being forced to suffer and endure against one’s will and against consent. These work by denying the monsters who call themselves the human race of their freedom and liberty and that’s the primary recourse of the protection of the weak. Such purpose is irrelevant to doctors. The medical suicide experts see no reason to provide any humane protections for suicidal individuals. They’re competent at ignoring the cruelty and evil they’re doing not competent at caring. It’s very much the cruelty of monsters in “so what if we make a suicidal individual want to die even more” that’s those who are the best at caring about suicidal individuals feel.

Do you understand what I mean when I say “the wings of angels have never protected suicidal individuals before”. The wings of angels protect suicidal individuals and this includes by assisted suicide. This comes from humanisation and the most basic empathy.

The medical suicide experts have succeeded in dehumanising suicidal individuals to such an extent that the protection of the weak doesn’t exist. Even the human rights movement don’t want to protect suicidal individuals. They try to protect prisoners of war from unlimited suffering – from torture – but don’t want to protect suicidal individuals from unlimited suffering and torture. They also believe there’s nothing too cruel to do to a suicidal individual. I’m still feeling suicidal because of this truth.

It is obvious to me that ordinary hurts and harms are far worse than done to a suicidal individual. It’s obvious to me because I know the pain and beyond awfulness of feeling suicidal that the acts of forcing suffering and against consent are even more cruel when done to suicidal individuals. They are necessary evils but everything should be done to counteract the cruelty and evil.

But these evils and cruelties can’t be made unlimited. The cruelty is even greater than being forced to suffer and endure against one’s will ordinary pain and feelings what’s done to suicidal individuals by being forced to live to face the exact things we’re choosing to use one’s death to escape from. It’s inherently more cruel and evil to force suicidal individuals to suffer and endure against one’s will even more suicidal feelings and thoughts. It cannot be made unlimited.

This is why assisted suicide is never a crime. It is a protection without equal against so many things. The power of assisted suicide is the guarantee of safety and protection in the power of the individual. The acts of forcing someone to suffer and endure against one’s will are so much worse than ordinary cruelties and crimes. They cannot be made unlimited. This is a basis for care based on the most basic empathy for suicidal individuals. It’s a protection only made more invaluable because of the evil of monsters that defines the medicalised suicide system and suicide laws.

The purpose of the law to provide humane protections doesn’t exist to protect suicidal individuals so assisted suicide is an even more invaluable protection. These humane protections don’t exist because the medical suicide experts see nothing too cruel to do to a suicidal individual and no harms too great to inflict on someone who already faces what’s worse than death. Their competency is to protect the self interests of monsters and things like the freedom to make a suicidal individual want to die they do succeed in caring about.

Their acceptability of suicidality as an acceptable consequence damns every single suicidal individual and it’s this acceptablility of suicidality that defines something so barbaric as the criminalisation of assisted suicide. Their objective of care and the only objective of unlimited care is to make suffering and cruelty and suicidality as unlimited as possible.

Assisted suicide is a protection without equal against unlimited suffering and unlimited suicidality. That’s why it’s never a crime.

But it’s also a protection without equal against unlimited cruelties and evils. Again it’s the power of the individual to limit pain and cruelty.

The law and the law makers are whores to the vagaries of morality. It’s up to the monsters to recognise evils and cruelties and harms too great but they’re always failing to do the right thing. Only when morality changes does each generation of the monsters who are law makers create the laws that protect more victims than the generation of monsters before them. The immense amount of cruelties the law makers legislate for than against to be done to suicidal individuals – just like drug addicts and users – is the obvious proof of this truth.

Assisted suicide is not fickle. It is fundamental to the protection of the weak because it supersedes morality and the fickleness of the law makers to serve the victims. It’s a protection without equal against unlimited cruelties and evils – it doesn’t rely on anyone else but the victim to judge what’s worth using the guarantee of assisted suicide to be safe at last.

This is a radically different way of seeing the necessity of the legalisation of assisted suicide and a purpose that’s not been part of the assisted suicide debate. It represents the power of the individual to be safe and no longer a victim of whatever evil and cruelty prevails in whatever generation of the monsters who call themselves the human race that only the victim can recognise is evil and cruelty too great to live through.

To not recognise this purpose typifies the things that make my life even worse than death. The monsters who call themselves the human race don’t have the truth about human nature. They don’t recognise just how cruel and evil a species of monsters born and bred evil always is and still is.

You really don’t need to look back far into history to recognise things you’d wish you were never born than be born to face. There’s so many examples throughout history you should be able to recognise through hindsight about just how cruel and evil the monsters who call themselves the human race are and you’d find examples of the things you’d be happy to die to escape from.

That’s how you get the competency to recognise your death is not the worst thing that can happen to you – because you don’t have this now. Then you recognise why assisted suicide is a necessary protection and while there will be barriers to completely free access to assisted suicide it is a protection without equal that no one can be totally denied.

* You want to control your pain then you want the protection of assisted suicide. You want to control the cruelty and evil done to you then you also need the protection of assisted suicide. In my personal experience there is nothing else and no one who can care about me or protect me but by assisted suicide. It is even more invaluable when the protections that exist serve the self interests of monsters not suicidal individuals.

When they know I can’t bear the pain of living. The brutality the monsters who call themselves the human race do to this suicidal individual is either in ignorance of or disregard for the truth I can’t bear the pain of living. They refuse to recognise I’ve been forced to suffer and endure against my will too much already. It is a level of pain and cruelty you could not bear when it happens to you.

It is because of the acceptability of suicidality as an acceptable consequence. This saves no one.

(Suicidality = suicidal suffering, feelings and thoughts.)

The acceptability of suicidality is because even the (medical) suicide experts in this civilisation of monsters are unaffected by how suicidal individuals feel. They are unaffected by how suicidal individuals feel and serve their self interests so there’s nothing too cruel to do to a suicidal individual. It’s all about preventing successful suicide and nothing at all that protects suicidal individuals from the things that make us want to die, further and worsen our suicidality. They make suicidal individuals powerless and unprotected against this.

The last thing you ever want to face is the acceptability of suicidality as an acceptable consequence but it’s this that truly kills as well as the pathetic attempts to care about suicidal individuals by those who are unaffected by how suicidal individuals feel.

Assisted suicide saves from this and it’s something suicidal individuals look forward to and it serves our self interests. It makes us empowered and protected from the horrific consequences routinely done to suicidal individuals by those who believe suicidality is an acceptable consequence.

Those against the legalisation of assisted suicide (for all) simply fail to protect suicidal individuals. I have more than a decade’s worth of proof of how they compound and multiple their failures to care but their cruelty is flawless.

They don’t have the right objectives or the right methods. Their care is the equivalent of seeing a man broken physically – the analogy of having several broken bones might be something you can have empathy for in a way you don’t have empathy for suicidal individuals – and the care professionals kick and punch the broken bones and break more bones. They also protect the rest of the monsters who call themselves the human race and their freedom to kick and punch and break more bones. Because all that matters to the self interests of monsters is a suicidal individual doesn’t die and die a good death.

In service of this self interest they’ll use any cruelty and evil – such as imprisonment by sectioning – because they ignore the pain.

The objective of living in safety from suicidality or making suicidality avoidable or the prevention of suicidality is irrelevant to the self interests of monsters but they’re obviously fundamental to the self interests of suicidal individuals. As well as other forms of humane care.

It’s the brutal barbaric savagery of the monsters who call themselves the human race that’s well protected not suicidal individuals protected. These brutalities further and worsen suicidality. They further and worsen what’s already too much pain for the suicidal mind. And what care exists is also so full of cruelty that it leaves suicidal individuals unprotected except by assisted suicide but the barbaric brutality of savages denies suicidal individuals even this clear and present humane protection.

You must recognise that humane protections – the protection of the weak – is by standing in harms way. Unfortunately the medical profession are monsters and the only harm too great to do to a suicidal individual they’ve ever recognised in the centuries of the existence of psychiatry is suicidal individuals dying and dying a good death. They see no other harm. They see nothing too cruel to do to a suicidal individual. Thus no humane protections that stand in harms way exists.

They have no competency to recognise the things worse than death. Because they are unaffected by how suicidal individuals feel. They lack any comprehension of the truth about human nature and conscious beings. They don’t recognise what suicidal individuals face is worse than death and they have no competency to recognise suicidal individuals have clearly already suffered too much.

Such basic empathy doesn’t exist because they see mental illness and brain defects and incompetent minds instead of feeling for suicidal individuals. This defines the corrupted meaning of vulnerability used in psychiatric and mental health care which is the opposite of the protection of the weak. By the standards of psychiatrists it’s suicidal individuals who are deprived of freedom and liberty and rights as the sole protection of the weak they care about. They’re all about control and cruelty not care by empathy because they see mental illness as cause and effect.

A poor analogy would be a wife routinely beaten senseless by her husband being locked up. This is how doctors have a different meaning of the word and concept of vulnerability. Their profession believes the weak are weak because there’s something wrong with us and our brains so there’s no care here. If victims of domestic abuse were victims of psychiatry then they’d be locked up and forcibly medicated and the freedom and liberty of the wife beater is protected. They won’t stop the beating or the beater and that’s how the medical profession protects the weak. If there were no protections against domestic abuse and the victims of abuse are suicidal then psychiatrists would believe their pain is because there’s something wrong with them and their brains.

Do you recognise what’s better never having born than born to face? Do you recognise what’s worse than death and that’s the sense of care of monsters for suicidal individuals?

What I am victim of is the wife routinely beaten senseless by her husband and she’s suicidal and a victim of psychiatry. Then all around her accept the cruelty and pain of the victim but – in this analogy – they see divorce as what is wrong and too awful to exist. So she keeps on getting beaten and keeps on feeling suicidal. By divorce I’m talking about assisted suicide.

I am victim of the barbaric brutality of savages unfettered and unlimited. If you have a humane bone in your being you recognise it’s not assisted suicide that’s the crime. Assisted suicide protects and saves and it gives the victim control whereas doctors do so much to control suicidal individuals and leave the monsters who call themselves the human race free and evil.

It’s already worse than death what a suicidal individual faces and the best of the monsters who call themselves the human race at caring about suicidal individuals risk making it even worse without hesitation or qualms and the rest of the monsters who call themselves the human race remain free and evil to do whatever monsters want to do to a suicidal individual. The perpetrators remain free while the victims are deprived of liberty and rights and imprisoned.

The freedom to abuse and torment and torture suicidal individuals is always well protected by the medical suicide experts and it’s things like evil never satiated when making a suicidal individual want to die and the act of deliberately forcing a suicidal individual to live to keep on making them want to die that’s well protected by the medicalisation of suicide.

This is what? This is the same sense of care that’s the only way assisted suicide can ever be a crime. A species of monsters born and bred evil can’t do anything else because they’ve never had the most basic empathy for suicidal individuals. Instead of protecting suicidal individuals they protect the monsters. It’s the monsters who want to achieve unlimited suffering, unlimited suicidality and unlimited evil who are protected by the criminalisation of assisted suicide and everything else based on the medicalisation of suicide.

(The freedom to inflict, prolong and worsen suicidality indefinitely is only in the self interests of monsters and that’s all the medicalised suicide system has succeeded in protecting.)

We can’t live in safety. We’re better off having never been born than be born to face what we’re expected to face.

Do you now understand what I mean when I say

When no one of good conscience can prevail then assisted suicide is a protection without equal

You take the example of a wife routinely beaten senseless by her husband and made to keep on feeling suicidal but everyone around her accepts these harms and evils. They bear the pain and cruelty like monsters do. They give the victim no control over the pain and cruelty. They only see divorce as too awful to happen. The beating never stops.

It’s because no one of good conscience exists that’s why assisted suicide is a crime.

“I die so they can’t hurt me even more” – the pain of a life made worse than death and the best of you who care about suicidal individuals can do is care about making it even worse than death – because you have no good in you.

* Your self interests are the self interests of monsters and that’s what defines the criminalisation of assisted suicide. Caring about your self interests has made so much of my life spent suicidal

When so many want to force on you things you’d never choose you’ll understand why assisted suicide is a protection without equal. When so many want to force you to suffer and endure against your will like you want to do to me I promise you you will recognise why the legalisation of assisted suicide is in your self interests.

This is primarily written for the government but it applies to everyone else who protects the self interests of monsters that is the freedom to inflict, prolong and worsen suicidality indefinitely protected by the criminalisation of assisted suicide.

You serve your self interests by the acceptability of suicidality.

(Suicidality = suicidal suffering, feelings and thoughts.)

The criminalisation of the act of suicide was in the self interests of monsters and so is denying the protection of assisted suicide now.

  • A decade of continuously feeling suicidal
  • Half the days of my adulthood spent suicidal
  • A third of the years of my life more than a few months I spend suicidal

You see care in this but it’s only the self interests of the monsters who call themselves the human race coming first that’s the proof of my suicidality. It is in no one’s self interests to spend so much of a lifetime feeling suicidal and being forced to suffer and endure against my will even more suicidality. You don’t care about my self interests when your self interests are served by the acceptability of suicidality. You force things on me I’d never choose in your self interests. You care about everyone else but me.

You take away the protection of assisted suicide to serve your self interests in a way no different to the self interests served and protected by the criminalisation of the act of suicide.

Again and again you fail to recognise the extent of the evil and harms you are doing to me even when I’m suicidal already. You can’t care. You can’t recognise the harms or evils so you fail my self interests time and again.

The effect of serving your self interests is I’d be happier if I’d never ever failed to kill myself. You only continue to serve your self interests once I become suicidal and stay suicidal. You ignore pain and consent to serve your self interests and they are the self interests of monsters so you are very capable of doing cruelty to suicidal individuals because you don’t care if you further and worsen suicidality. You serve your self interests so you don’t care if you further or worsen suicidality yet it is completely obviously in the self interests of suicidal individuals to be protected from further and worsening of suicidality.

Instead your self interests are served by the brutality of expecting a suicidal individual to get used to feeling suicidal – these are the self interests of monsters. It is not in the self interests of suicidal individuals to be expected to get used to feeling suicidal.

Your self interests are to prevent successful suicide but the self interests of suicidal individuals are not becoming suicidal or staying suicidal. You recognise just how different caring about the self interests of monsters and caring about the self interests of suicidal individuals is yet?

You have no comphrension of what it feels like to be suicidal and that’s why you can’t legalise assisted suicide. You cannot weigh the evil and harms care correctly. You serve your self interests and look at what doing this achieves. Look at the extent of my suicidality. It is beyond crimes and punishments worse than death to force so much suicidality on anyone no matter how much you hate me.

When you feel for me you can’t bear this to happen to a suicidal individual. You couldn’t bear this level of cruelty in forcing you to suffer and endure against your will such an extent of suicidality.

You don’t ever want so much of your life to be so beyond awful as this. Only assisted suicide saves and protects.

* Why am I destined to spend so much of my lifetime feeling suicidal (sent to the Prime Minister’s office)

Because like every other government before yours you are unaffected by how suicidal individuals feel. So you commit crimes against my humanity.

The acceptability of suicidal feelings and thoughts as acceptable consequences damns every one who has the capacity to feel. This is not care.

You would never choose to have the extent of my suicidality inflicted on you. You should fear this happening to you and rightly fear the criminalisation of assisted suicide if you can feel for me.

If you can feel for me then I do not need to tell you to legalise assisted suicide. You can’t bear me to feel suicidal. If you feel for me.

https://mercyp2blog.wordpress.com/2020/12/25/for-once-recognise-the-extent-of-the-evil-you-are-doing-to-me/?preview=true

* For once recognise the extent of the evil you are doing to me

It’s because you don’t recognise the extent of the evil you are doing to me it is always worth using my death to stop you. It is because you can’t accurately weigh the evil and the harms that is why I am better off having never been born – this is what I mean when I say it’s always worth using my death to stop you (you the government, the care professions and the rest of the monsters who call themselves the human race).

I should not need to fight for my death if you recognise the extent of the evil and harms. But you can’t do this. You can’t weigh the evils and harms with the most basic empathy and understanding for my being – but that’s what defines your acts or care and that’s only made the tragedies of my existence even worse than death.

You have never had the most basic empathy and understanding for my being and that’s why I have spent so much of my lifetime feeling suicidal. You bear my suicidality like you’re a species of monsters born and bred evil and only competent when caring about and protecting your self interests not mine. The extent of my suicidality is chosen by so many monsters in the name of their self interests not mine.

To live without the most basic empathy and understanding for my being to protect me is a life worse than death. You can’t weigh the extent of the evil and harms correctly so it has always been worth using my death to stop you. You bear my suicidality as acceptable consequences because you have never had the most basic empathy and understand. Thus you do not recognise the evil and harms.

I have to work for care. Your sense of care for suicidal individuals is too evil and cruel.

You have never comphrended the evil and pure evil the monsters who call themselves the human race care about doing to suicidal individuals.