Ugh. I hate that I have to explain this. It’s such a simple and obvious truth about humane care.

But humane care doesn’t exist yet. Instead there’s psychiatric and mental health care based on the biomedical model of mental health and illness. The truth of the biopsychosocial model is yet to prevail whereas as the lie of mental illness has prevailed for centuries. The difference between these two models is not a theoretical nuance but a fundamental shift towards humane care for suicidal individuals. It’s the difference between “we care about getting whatever we want from a suicidal individual by any means necessary no matter how cruel and evil the methods or how cruel and evil the consequences are” and care.

I believe the criminalisation of assisted suicide is the epitome of “we care about getting whatever we want from a suicidal individual by any means necessary no matter how cruel and evil the methods or how cruel and evil the consequences are”. It is done devoid of even the most basic compassion.

It defines those who are so able to fail to recognise my life should never be so bad that I’m suicidal and never stop failing to care after this failure to care.

Now back to the point.

“The mercy and protection of assisted suicide”

Assisted suicide serves so many purposes and it is without equal in a few of these purposes.

But it’s to recognise what being suicidal is about that’s the path to understanding why assisted suicide is never a crime.

There are two broad categories of why suicidal individuals become suicidal and stay suicidal. These are the two most common reasons but when you dig further into specific reasons beyond these two broad categories you will find a wide diversity of the suicidal mind.

• Unbearable suffering

• Unbearable quality of life

It’s here I’m struggling to communicate and find the right words. By unbearable I mean unbearable to the point that it’s worse than death and worth dying to escape from. Even beyond these two broad categories it is obvious that what a suicidal individual is facing is worse than death by the decision to use one’s death.

I started on this blog because of something important which is mercy. But I came across something from one of the organisations in the movement to legalise assisted suicide. They’re called My Death My Decision but they used to be SOARS, The Society for Old Age Rational Suicide.

One of the reasons to die they support is the rational reason to die when the suicidal individual feels life is complete. Does this reason fall into the two broad categories?

Yes. It’s the emptiness of life that some feel lightly whereas others feel so profoundly it’s worth dying to escape from.

Many live their lives with certain fulfillment from getting married and bringing up children. They might also get fulfilment from doing a job and learning to do it well. Then when they get old they retire and their children move on. They might also lose their partner.

This happens to so many but some find the emptiness to be unbearable. Life has no purpose – again some feel this lightly and some feel it so strongly it’s worse than death. Some need purpose and meaning for life and to exist and once this is gone then life is empty and worse than death.

A hollow existence is awful for some. I’m reminded of the task of Sisyphus here and a vision of hell described in Roman times that’s the emptiness and futility of existence as well as the powerlessness of facing such punishment. (I assume the individual who came up with this version of hell was of a philosopher type.)

Rolling a boulder up a hill and getting it to the top then it rolls down to the bottom and the task begins again might not seem like hell to some. But it’s a hell I assume that’s analogous to what’s felt by those who want to end their lives because their life is complete. It’s the hollow and empty, the purposeless and meaningless, characteristic of existence that is worth dying to escape from. Some are unaffected by it and for others it’s unbearable quality of life and perhaps unbearable suffering too to keep on living for nothing.

(It’s an effect because of the devaluation of the elderly especially from the point where society and culture changed to what’s commonplace which is the “nuclear family”. When once households were three tiered – children adults and the elderly (or children parents and grandparents as another way to say it) in one house now it’s two tiered households (children and parents) then the elderly (grandparents) live separately. (For better or for worse much of my childhood I lived in a three tier household.))

(But it’s also an effect of the total and utter disregard for the mental needs of conscious beings. Because such needs when they’re failed to be met the mental phenomena fall under the cause and effect model of the biomedical model of mental health and illness and such suffering and emptiness of existence is explained as the result of a brain defect.)

But I digress…

The point is that what a suicidal individual wants to die for is inherently worse than death. That’s the statement I have about the rationality but also the respect for the diversity of the suicidal mind. More than the rationality in itself it’s the respect I have for just how horrifically beyond awful it is to become suicidal and stay suicidal irrespective of the given reason or reasons from vast amounts of personal experiences the monsters who call themselves the human race have had so generously given me. (It’s evil never satiated when making me want to die that’s what I face so I have reasons to die not just one.)

It’s from this acknowledgement of the horrific awfulness of becoming suicidal and staying suicidal that’s from where I take the meaning of “the mercy and protection of assisted suicide”. It’s from the validity of the suicidal mind from the biopsychosocial model rather than the denigration of the validity of the mind that’s what’s fundamental to the biomedical model of mental health and illness.

For example “I’m suicidal because I’m lonely” as a given reason to die. The response is that “you can always find friends” but that’s what a suicidal individual already knows but the hopelessness and powerlessness to realise this objective is what the suicidal mind faces. For example a suicidal individual who’s suicidal because they’re lonely suffers from the rejections they keep on facing when they try to find friends. There’s more to understand than the superficial based on the given reason to die but it’s essential to recognise it’s universally awful to be at the point where one wants to use one’s death. If you have never stepped forth onto the path to understanding the wide diversity of mental suffering and mental states – that’s all of you the monsters who call themselves the human race – then you see the reason to die but you don’t recognise how it’s the tip of the iceberg.

What makes suicidal individuals become suicidal and stay suicidal is we face what’s worse than death. If you take the reason to die and you don’t recognise it’s a good enough reason to die then that’s your problem. It’s your burden to try to understand the diversity of the mind and the suicidal mind. Because the truth is that what most if not all suicidal individuals face is what’s worse than death and worth dying to escape from – that’s the truth about the suicidal mind. It’s inherently worse than death when to die is the solution and if you can’t recognise why then that’s the problem with you – you have never stepped forth onto the path to understanding the wide diversity of mental suffering and mental diversity.

From this truth about how beyond horrific it is to become suicidal and stay suicidal…do I really need to explain what I mean by “the mercy and protection of assisted suicide”?

It’s worse than death. It’s worth dying to escape from. That’s the validity and rationality of the suicidal mind and if you face the same suicidal thoughts and feelings – irrespective of the reason to die – then you would choose to die.

What you think the worst thing that can happen to you is death? Don’t you have the competency to recognise there’s so many things worse than death? If you can’t recognise the cruelty in unlimited cruelties and unlimited suffering then look back throughout the history of the monsters who call themselves the human race and surely you’ll find countless examples of unlimited suffering and unlimited cruelty you’d wish you were never born to face and would die to escape from.

These things still exist. These things keep on happening even now. These things that are worse than death are made so much worse because of the denigration of the validity of the suicidal mind. That’s what has happened throughout the existence of the institution of psychiatry that the suicidal mind has the validity of the mind denigrated and dehumanised

I’ve spent years trying to find the right word or phrase or analogy to communicate the beyond awfulness of feeling suicidal. There’s no care without the recognition of what’s worse than death.

To recognise the truth about just how awful it is to become suicidal and stay suicidal it is only the beginning of care.

It’s when you have the truth to guide you you have a beginning to care and the objectives and methods and what’s top of the agenda of care.

It’s when you have the truth to guide you you must recognise these three things about being suicidal.

• It’s too cruel to happen to anyone

• It’s too cruel to inflict on anyone

• It’s too cruel to force anyone to endure*

(*Unfortunately I do believe in a degree of deprivation of liberty between decision and death but it’s still cruelty.)

It’s obvious of course but this recognition of the cruelty doesn’t prevail. “We can do whatever we want to do to a suicidal individual and it doesn’t matter how cruel or evil our methods are” is what’s prevailed for millennia and throughout the existence of psychiatry. You think this is how to protect suicidal individuals when you believe in psychiatric and mental health care but what I see is this “We can do whatever we want to do to a suicidal individual and it doesn’t matter how cruel or evil our methods are” that only makes assisted suicide even more invaluable. Because when you face “We can do whatever we want to do to a suicidal individual and it doesn’t matter how cruel or evil our methods are”you’ll recognise just how much better it is to be dead.

It’s the problem with psychiatric and mental health care because it’s based on the prevail of the biomedical model – the lie of mental illness – for centuries that asserts that suicidal individuals become suicidal and stay suicidal because we have a defective brain thus a defective mind. No compassion or empathy or understanding can be achieved from the lie of mental illness. You don’t need to have compassion or empathy or understanding for what’s the product of a brain defect.

But when you recognise the validity of the suicidal mind and the universal horrific awfulness of facing what’s worse than death and worth dying to escape from…do I have to explain what the words “the mercy and protection of assisted suicide” means?

It’s worse than death. It can’t happen and it can’t keep on happening. To have mercy for suicidal individuals is to have the protection of assisted suicide there. Because it’s worse than death to become suicidal and stay suicidal. It’s already beyond the limit to what a conscious being can endure when a suicidal individual becomes suicidal. It’s worse than death because it’s not ordinary pain but it’s pain beyond the limit to what can be endured that’s what is what you would die to escape from. It’s so beyond awful what we face that it’s worth using one’s death. To face and keep on facing the worst moments of one’s life it drives many suicidal to use one’s death because we face what’s worse than death.

(I am still desperately trying to communicate what it feels like to be beyond the limit to what I can suffer and endure. To recognise this truth – it’s never happened before.)

You become suicidal because you can’t bear what you face. It’s beyond the limit to what you can endure so obviously you who have the capacity to feel you become suicidal. Obviously death is bad but you face what’s worse than death – that’s what being suicidal is about and it’s a natural and rational response because conscious beings we have a limit to what we can endure beyond which we can’t live.

It’s from the most basic empathy and understanding you get what mean when I say about being suicidal

• It’s too cruel to happen to anyone

• It’s too cruel to inflict on anyone

• It’s too cruel to force anyone to endure

These are obvious truths but they do not prevail. But these are the truths that are the differences between the biomedical model and the biopsychosocial model. These are the truths that should be self evident but they are not what prevails. Mental health and psychiatric care is only too cruel because the severity of the suffering of suicidal individuals and the awfulness of feeling suicidal is ignored for centuries and millennia.

The prevail of psychiatric and mental health care it only makes assisted suicide even more invaluable because of the belief “We can do whatever we want to do to a suicidal individual and it doesn’t matter how cruel or evil our methods are”. Force, deprivation of liberty, imprisonment, violence*, the deprivation of the protection of human rights – there is no end to the cruelties that can be done to a suicidal individual in the name of psychiatric and mental health care and it really is a profound sense of cruelty that has no concept of what’s too cruel to do to a suicidal individual.

(* Forced injections – because the monsters who call themselves the human race have no concept of what’s too cruel to do to a suicidal individual forced injections are a method of psychiatric and mental health care. You face it. Being forced down and pinned down and forcibly injected. The only difference between rape and forced injections is the former is a sexual act. They both involve force and violence to violate and penetrate the body by force. But there’s no such thing as too cruel to do to a suicidal individual that defines psychiatric and mental health care and no one told you the difference between cruelty and care so it happens for the same reasons assisted suicide is a crime.)

This sense of cruelty that has absolutely no concept of what’s too cruel to do to a suicidal individual defines the criminalisation of assisted suicide and a sense of care in itself worth dying to escape from – I speak from vast amounts of personal experiences so generously given to me want by the monsters who call themselves the human race of all the things too cruel to do to a suicidal individual but the monsters who call themselves the human race call unlimited cruelty care.

It’s a sense of care devoid of mercy and that’s why it’s a sense of cruelty. Care with no sense of what’s too cruel to do to a suicidal individual and care without mercy is why assisted suicide can be a crime.

But it’s never a crime. Not when you recognise and understand just how beyond awful it is to become suicidal and stay suicidal. Only when you bear what suicidal individuals face lightly can assisted suicide ever be a crime.

(Look at the purpose of every single law that legislates against suffering without consent but it’s only the progress of empathy for physical suffering that has progressed across millennia. It is recognised by so many laws and legal precedents that suffering without consent is what humane laws protect against and that’s how the weak are protected. Such purposes are irrelevant when it’s mental suffering and suicidal suffering – there’s no question the answer is yes according to the values and standards of this generation of the monsters who call themselves the human race. To this day I face what only a species of monsters born and bred evil can force a suicidal individual to suffer and endure against my will and with the utter disregard for my consent I can trust the monsters who call themselves the human race to do. The cruelty of forcing someone to suffer and endure without consent and against ones will is obviously even more cruel when it’s done to a suicidal individual but you don’t recognise this do you so you only make the mercy and protection of assisted suicide even more invaluable.)

Assisted suicide is without equal in serving this protection that’s what suicidal individuals need. It is an act of mercy and care based on being affected by how suicidal individuals feel. It is based on the recognition that death is bad but it is not the worst thing that can happen.

It’s care that recognises the truth about being suicidal

• It’s too cruel to happen to anyone
• It’s too cruel to inflict on anyone
• It’s too cruel to force anyone to endure

It’s the care that recognises the limit to what a conscious being can endure is not there to be transgressed or ignored. It’s the care that recognises the truth that suicidal individuals know and that’s that while death is bad there’s things worse than death. It’s care based on the validity and rationality of the suicidal mind by the most basic empathy.

THAT’S HOW YOU PROTECT THE WEAK. AND THAT’S WHY ASSISTED SUICIDE IS NEVER A CRIME. IT’S FUNDAMENTAL TO THE PROTECTION OF THE WEAK AND IT IS THE VERY DEFINITION OF CARE BECAUSE ASSISTED SUICIDE IS ALL ABOUT MERCY.

You’d kill yourself not for the reason to die but for the suicidal thoughts and feelings. That’s the truth when you recognise the limit to what can be endured is expressed by suicidal thoughts and feelings. A line that cannot be crossed has already been crossed – that’s what becoming suicidal is all about.

Without the legalisation of assisted suicide you only have the will to ignore the limit to what can be suffered and endured. It is with respect for the beyond awfulness of feeling suicidal that’s why you recognise the mercy and protection of assisted suicide can never be a crime.

(From the biomedical model of mental health and illness all you succeed in is control and cruelty. Face what I face then you’ll recognise I don’t face care. I face “we care about getting whatever we want from a suicidal individual by any means necessary no matter how cruel and evil the methods or how cruel and evil the consequences are” – the opposite of the protection of the weak and the epitome of this is the criminalisation of assisted suicide.)

Do you care yet?

The hope of the mercy and protection of assisted suicide cannot be denied. This is obvious. While a degree of deprivation of liberty between decision and death is something I believe in the hope of the mercy and protection of assisted suicide can’t be denied.

What defines psychiatric and mental health care and the criminalisation of assisted suicide is is the will to achieve unlimited suffering and unlimited cruelty and unlimited evil. These things can only be made unlimited by denying the hope of the mercy and protection of assisted suicide.

There’s no other way to achieve the perfection of the objectives of unlimited suffering and unlimited cruelty and unlimited evil than by denying the hope of the mercy and protection of assisted suicide. The pursuit of sadistic cruelty – and clearly that’s what defines human nature – is what’s protected by denying the hope of the mercy and protection of assisted suicide.

That’s why no one can be denied the hope of the mercy and protection of assisted suicide.

This alternative post I hope makes the point about what only a species of monsters born and bred evil can do to a suicidal individual and that’s why no one can be denied the hope of the mercy and protection of assisted suicide.

It’s what I trust the monsters who call themselves the human race to do and really succeed. You live with it until it happens to someone you care about. You live with it until you face it.

You don’t have a heart. Instead you have psychiatric and mental health care and the biomedical model of mental health and mental illness. How else can killing me be the crime?

I face this truth every single day. What’s achieved if I fail to kill myself is I’m a victim of the sadistic cruelty of a species of monsters born and bred evil who call themselves the human race.

My suffering. How I feel. Even when I’m suicidal already this is ignored. So I keep on feeling suicidal and that’s what is so acceptable to a species of monsters born and bred evil because it is sadistic nature that defines human nature.

What I am forced to suffer and endure against my will by the criminalisation of assisted suicide is not an acceptable consequence anywhere else but where the sadistic nature of monsters prevails.

It is always the instincts of the monsters who call themselves the human race to do cruelty to suicidal individuals first and foremost and this generation of monsters is no different.

They only see care in the acts of forcing someone to live so they actually think the criminalisation of assisted suicide is care. It’s the opposite of care.

It is care that doesn’t care about suffering or liberty or free will or what are humane protections for suicidal individuals. It’s care that relies on force, deprivation of liberty, depriving the protection of human rights, imprisonment and even violence. Care by unlimited cruelties and evils. This is what psychiatric and mental health care is. It is the sense of care of tyrants and slave owners.

Care that has the objectives of unlimited suffering and unlimited cruelty is what the criminalisation of assisted suicide is. It is a profound sense of cruelty that wants to take the cruelty in forcing someone to suffer and endure against our wills and wants to make such cruelty unlimited.

The acts of forcing someone to live are both cruelty and care. It is care because of the risks of death and because of the fallibility of the mind. I do respect this but I do not respect depriving the hope of the mercy and protection of assisted suicide.

But they’re still the acts of forcing someone to suffer and endure against our wills that defines the cruelty inherent in the acts of forcing someone to live. Forcing suffering without consent is cruelty. It’s even greater cruelty when it’s done to a suicidal individual because we’re forced to suffer and endure what’s so horrifically awful we choose to die to escape from it. This point I can’t stress enough that it is even more cruel to force suicdal individuals to suffer against our consent because it’s worse than death what we face and are choosing to die to escape from.

Obviously the monsters who call themselves the human race have no recognition of this cruelty and they have absolutely no concept of what’s too cruel to do to a suicidal individual. The mental health laws are all about using unlimited cruelty and offer not a single humane protection for suicidal individuals because the monsters who call themselves the human race have absolutely no concept of what’s too cruel to do to a suicidal individual. We suicidal individuals we lose our freedom and the protection of human rights and these are deemed to be essential protections so we are victims of force and deprivation of liberty and imprisonment and even violence all justified as essential care but there’s no humane protections such as depriving the monsters who call themselves the human race of their freedom to make a suicidal individual want to die.

Which only makes assisted suicide even more invaluable. Because a species of monsters born and bred evil who call themselves the human race is always deaf to the screams of suicidal individuals “this is too cruel to do to me” assisted suicide is even more invaluable.

You see a sense of care in always being deaf to the screams of suicidal individuals and by this standard of care assisted suicide is a crime. It is a standard of care that doesn’t care about the suffering of suicidal individuals and that’s a fundamental problem caused by the instincts of the monsters who call themselves the human race for millennia to do cruelty first and foremost to suicidal individuals.

Care that ignores your suffering and deprives you of the protection of human rights. This is what?

When’s the right time for your suffering to be irrelevant? When you’re suicidal? Yes. When’s the right time to be deprived of the protection of human rights? When you face the worst state of conscious existence and mental suffering? Yes.

For centuries throughout the existence of psychiatry doctors and lawyers and politicians and the human rights movement and the mental health movement have all said yes to the questions in the above paragraph. It defines more than the criminalisation of assisted suicide but the criminalisation of assisted suicide is the epitome of the yes answers.

It is a tragedy beyond compare. When life is already worse than death there is no protection of the weak in the laws that affect suicidal individuals and this includes the criminalisation of assisted suicide. There’s at best the protection against the fallibility of the mind but a protection specific to the minds of the victims of psychiatry. But there’s no humane protections for suicidal individuals and there’s no protection of the weak and that’s why assisted suicide is a crime. It all comes from the same place and that’s the sadistic nature of human nature.

Do you sense the venom in how I write this post? Do you get a sense of my hatred?

When your humanity is as thoroughly and completely betrayed as mine is then you’ll understand. When you face the cruelty of the freedom to inflict prolong and worsen suicidality indefinitely for a decade – and a decade is not the totality of my suicidality – you will recognise what I recognise and that’s that I face the pursuits of sadists and they’re who are protected not me.

What do you think the freedom to inflict, prolong and worsen suicidality indefinitely is? Throughout the existence of psychiatry it’s deemed to be care.

If the monsters who call themselves the human race decided to force a suicidal individual to live to keep on making their victim want to die this is a freedom protected. Do you recognise this truth about the sense of care of monsters?

If the monsters who call themselves the human race know they’re forcing a suicidal individual to live knowing they can’t protect their victim from even more suicidality and the infliction of further suicidality then this freedom is protected. Do you recognise the truth about the sense of care of a species of monsters born and bred evil?

The freedom to inflict, prolong and worsen suicidality indefinitely is care? Yes. That’s the same yes as the yes answers in the paragraph earlier.

It’s care without compassion so it’s care without mercy. When a species of monsters born and bred evil has no concept of what’s too cruel to do to a suicidal individual. It is the opposite of the protection of the weak.

Where’s the truth it’s too awful to become suicidal and stay suicidal? This is the sort of basis for care that’s the antithesis of the best sense a species of monsters born and bred evil can achieve. It’s care based on knowing pain like a suicidal individual does. Not ignoring the suffering of suicidal individuals which is what defines more than the criminalisation of assisted suicide.

The monsters who call themselves the human race do what? Whatever the monsters who call themselves the human race care about it’s not about this suicidal individual or any other they care about. Whatever monsters want to do to a suicidal individual – that’s what is protected not suicidal individuals. Because it’s their instincts of monsters.

I have lost so much because of this will that’s protected to do whatever monsters want to do to a suicidal individual. It’s this evil that’s protected by denying me access to assisted suicide. The monsters have even used violence to get whatever they want from this suicidal individual.

Do you see the protection of the weak or do you see the protection of the freedom to inflict, prolong and worsen suicidality indefinitely? For the latter the criminalisation of assisted suicide is essential. It’s essential for assisted suicide to be a crime to protect the pursuits of sadists and sadistic cruelty. It’s only the protection of the pursuits of sadists that’s protected by the protection of the freedom to inflict, prolong and worsen suicidality indefinitely. The criminalisation of assisted suicide is essential to protecting such pursuits of sadistic cruelty.

It’s the purpose of denying the hope of the mercy and protection of assisted suicide to achieve things like unlimited suffering and unlimited cruelty. Because assisted suicide is without equal as a protection against unlimited suffering and unlimited cruelty.

But do the monsters who call themselves the human race have the competency to tell the difference between cruelty and care. No. But it’s their cruelty that’s what is absolutely flawless because of the criminalisation of assisted suicide. The freedom to inflict, prolong and worsen suicidality indefinitely is the objective well served by the criminalisation of assisted suicide. It’s not care.

Assisted suicide is a protection without equal in so many respects. It’s fundamentally a humane protection and it’s fundamental to the protection of the weak. Because it’s without equal for suicidal individuals in protecting from unlimited suffering and unlimited cruelty.

But it’s legalisation is based on a fundamentally different basis for care from psychiatric and mental health care. It’s based on the truth suicidal individuals know and that’s the truth that it’s too awful to become suicidal and stay suicidal – this is the truth that is anti-psychiatry. It’s a fundamentally different basis for care that’s the antithesis of the freedom to inflict, prolong and worsen suicidality indefinitely that’s what is protected by psychiatric and mental health care.

The freedom to inflict, prolong and worsen suicidality indefinitely is care? It’s the freedom always protected throughout the history of psychiatry. It’s the sense of care in the criminalisation of assisted suicide.

If you can’t recognise why assisted suicide is never a crime then all you need to happen to you is for you to be forced to suffer and endure against your will until you recognise the truth. It’s an education that begins when life is already worse than death and you are kept on being forced to suffer and endure against your will whatever a species of monsters born and bred evil wants to be free to do to a suicidal individual. It’s when you are forced to suffer and endure against your will more and more beyond becoming suicidal and the protection you face is the freedom to make a suicidal individual want to die again and again and again and never stop.

You suffer so much that living becomes worse than death. Then you face the freedom to make a suicidal individual want to die. You keep on being forced to suffer and endure against your will when you’re suicidal already. You’re forced to suffer what you choose to die to escape from. Then it doesn’t stop their. You keep on feeling suicidal and being made to feel suicidal and all the time the freedom to inflict, prolong and worsen your suicidality is what’s protected.

You live to keep on feeling suicidal and being made to feel suicidal. It’s what you are glad to die to escape from but you’re denied access to assisted suicide. You scream but you face monsters always deaf to the screams of suicidal individuals. It’s already worse than death to still be alive but you’re forced to live to keep on suffering and endure against your will and the freedom to make a suicidal individual want to die is what’s protected and protected by the criminalisation of assisted suicide.

The days turn into months then years and you know more and more about what unlimited suffering feels like from personal experience. The cruelty of forcing you to suffer against your will is made unlimited as is every other cruelty too cruel to do to a suicidal individual is made unlimited by denying you the mercy and protection of assisted suicide.

When you face the freedom to inflict, prolong and worsen suicidality indefinitely like I do. When you face the protection of the freedom to make a suicidal individual want to die like I do. When you are forced to suffer and endure against your will like I am. When your suffering and the limit to your suffering is there to be ignored like mine is.

When you are deprived of access to assisted suicide so the monsters who call themselves the human race can perfect their complete betrayal of your humanity you tell me what is wrong with killing me.

So…

I have to die. I don’t live for me. I live for the monsters who call themselves the human race to keep on proving they’re a species of monsters born and bred evil. I don’t suffer for me. I suffer because the monsters who call themselves the human race really do care about protecting the freedom to inflict, prolong and worsen suicidality indefinitely not about me.

They take from me what makes my life my life and in return they serve themselves by pursuing – and succeeding like only a species of monsters born and bred evil can do – their objectives of making my suffering unlimited and their cruelty unlimited. The very purpose of denying the hope of the mercy and protection of assisted suicide.

This is written for the enemies of suicidal individuals.

Here goes another shot into the darkness – into the hole where your hearts should be

It’s the will to risk hurting a suicidal individual. It’s the risks so easily taken to make a suicidal individual suffer even more. It’s the risk of making a suicidal individual want to die that’s taken as if the limit to suffering is there to be ignored.

These are the tragedies of suicidal individuals in a civilisation of monsters where psychiatric and mental health care exists. Suicidal individuals are not protected how the weak are meant to be protected.

But the epitome of this cruelty is the criminalisation of assisted suicide. Truly there’s a sickness in the minds of monsters that is the hole where your hearts should be.

You don’t recognise that becoming suicidal is a fundamental expression of the limit to what a conscious being can endure and willingly endure has been breached.

You don’t have this concept of a limit to suffering. Because of the existence of psychiatric and mental health care. You don’t recognise what the worst state of conscious existence and mental suffering is so you do not act accordingly with compassion and the fear of making a suicidal individual want to die.

But isn’t it obvious the truth about having the capacity to feel that there is a limit to what an individual can suffer and endure against our wills? And that’s the true cause of suicidality?

It’s not obvious to you and that’s why the laws that affect suicidal individuals have no concept of the abuse of a suicidal individual. The law makers believe suicidal individuals can’t be abused? Of course. It was only in the last century that the act of suicide was decriminalised but it is a decriminalisation that only follows on from rather than changes the instincts of the monsters who call themselves the human race to do cruelty to suicidal individuals first and foremost.

The law makers do protect the will to abuse suicidal individuals because they are not guided by how suicidal individuals feel. The law makers seek to deprive suicidal individuals of successful suicide by any means necessary and it is this “by any means necessary” that defines the profound sense of cruelty for suicidal individuals as well as the objective. It only leads to abuse of suicidal individuals.

The laws that affect suicidal individuals in this civilisation of monsters prove one thing so clearly: the limit to suffering is there to be ignored.

You weigh this truth how you want to. The monsters who call themselves the human race have never cared about how suicidal individuals feel. We’re not protected how the weak are meant to be protected. We’re not protected how you’re meant to protect we who face the worst state of conscious existence and mental suffering when living is already worse than death.

Thus the limit to suffering is there to be ignored. You rest easy with this truth. You bear the truth so easily that in this civilisation of monsters there’s no such thing as too cruel to do to a suicidal individual and that’s what the law serves. Because the limit to suffering is there to be ignored. The law makers have no concept of abuse done to a suicidal individual so there’s no protection against abusing a suicidal individual. Feel this.

Feel this

This is a truth that only makes assisted suicide even more invaluable as a protection without equal against the prevail of such heartlessness as is defined by: the limit to suffering is there to be ignored.

But it’s what prevails when psychiatric and mental health care exists. The will to take the worst moments of my life and make certain they keep on happening – you call it psychiatric and mental health care and I call it the proof of the prevail of the heartless and a sense of cruelty in itself worth dying to escape from or having to face.

I can’t hate you and your kind enough for the truth about what I face: the limit to what I can suffer and endure is there to be ignored. To this day I only face the prevail of the heartless that is in itself a worthy reason to die. I face the will to take the worst moments of my life and make certain they keep on happening – such will is what is protected by the law makers not suicidal individuals. Such is the purpose of denying access to assisted suicide to achieve such unlimited suffering and unlimited cruelty.

You expect me to be bulletproof so I am riddled with bullets. Do you understand this? Because it defines the medicalised suicide system and suicide laws.

To ignore the limit to suffering is the expectation that suicidal individuals are bulletproof in this analogy. By ignoring the limit to what I can suffer and endure i, my psyche, my will to live, my consciousness, are riddled by bullets and each bullet is the result of the prevail of the heartless who think by making certain the worst moments of my life keep on happening they care about me. Without a sense of what’s too cruel to do to a suicidal individual it only leads to more suicidal suffering, feelings and thoughts and such unacceptable consequences are so acceptable to the heartless who prevail.

You do see the consequences of purporting that the cause of why suicidal individuals become suicidal and stay suicidal is mental illness and a defective brain? Not only the limit to suffering is there to be ignored but the limit to what can be forced to make someone suffer is also ignored. We who face the worst state of conscious existence and mental suffering are oppressed and subjugated by the laws that affect suicidal individuals and in return for taking away our liberty and rights we face an anarchy of no concept of what’s too cruel to do to a suicidal individual and no protection against the abuse of a suicidal individual. What’s so important to suicidal individuals is so unimportant to those who purport to care and that’s why it’s so easy to inflict further suicidality and worsen suicidality as if the limit to suffering is there to be ignored.

Thus you expect me to be bulletproof so I am riddled by bullets. You expect strength from the weak and that’s an expectation fundamental to psychiatric and mental health care. So the weak are abused without mercy.

Thus I can’t live in safety. It’s because I’ve been completely dehumanised. The worst moments of my life will only keep on happening – what do you think I am fighting for and against that’s why I am fighting for my death and the mercy of assisted suicide?

It is a protection without equal. When the heartless prevail there is no mercy for suicidal individuals or anything that resembles the protection of the weak. So assisted suicide is even more invaluable. It is the only way a suicidal individual can limit the cruelty done to us and this includes the cruelty in the acts of forcing someone to live.

Care without mercy. Care without the protection of the weak. Care that believes the limit to suffering is there to be ignored. Care with no concept of what’s too cruel to do to a suicidal individual. Care that so easily abuses suicidal individuals and there’s no protection against the abuse of a suicidal individual. Care that has the objectives of unlimited suffering and unlimited cruelty*. Feel this the tragedies of being suicidal in a civilisation of monsters.

Why do you think being so far from the reach of the monsters who call themselves the human race is so important to me I’m glad to die to achieve it? Feel this.

(What do you think denying the hope of the mercy and protection of assisted suicide is? It is there only to serve sadistic cruelty. Assisted suicide with a degree of deprivation of liberty between decision and death is care but the criminalisation of assisted suicide is only to serve objectives of evil and pure evil such as to achieve unlimited suffering, unlimited cruelty, unlimited evil, unlimited revenge and punishments too cruel to do to anyone. Denying access to assisted suicide is how torture happens. When you really really want to hurt someone you have to make your victim want to die then force them to live so you can keep on making them want to die and if you want to make such cruelty unlimited then you are well served by the criminalisation of assisted suicide. Hell is a place only possible when assisted suicide is a crime. Only the pursuit of sadistic cruelty is protected by the criminalisation of assisted suicide. Whenever and wherever evil prevails the limit to what a conscious being can suffer and endure is there to be ignored and this is whenever and wherever assisted suicide is a crime.)

(What’s possible when you don’t recognise cruelty

(What the monsters who call themselves the human race do to me when living is already worse than death. How much proof do I have I can’t live in safety amongst monsters like you? You do believe the limit to what I can suffer and endure is there to be ignored. You do not care. You don’t know pain. Thus you bear what are wholly unacceptable consequences for suicidal individuals too easily. You do not care.)

You do have a heart and it beats.

Does your heartbeat quicken when you have an emotional response?

Perhaps when you’re worried or anxious or panicked or fear your heart beats faster. But there’s other emotions – I’m assuming you feel these emotions like I do – that quicken the heartbeat. Imagine you meet someone heart stoppingly beautiful for example. Perhaps you meet the most beautiful celebrity you can think of. Perhaps this is another emotion that might quicken your heartbeat. Perhaps when you’re stressed or angry your heart beats faster too.

Are these emotions caused by a biological defect? These emotions ice mentioned above can coincide with an increased heart rate so are they product of an illness or a disease?

The serotonin hypothesis is a fallacy or truth? Some forms of misery, sadness and extreme forms of misery can have coincide with a difference in serotonin transmission sort of like an increase in heartbeat can coincide with certain emotions.

The lie of mental illness and the way psychiatrists interpret this biological association with emotions is the difference in serotonin transmission is responsible for the misery. The increase in your heartbeat when experiencing certain emotions can be explained the same way as the serotonin hypothesis of depression purports is the relationship between cause and effect. Your emotional state is caused by the increase in your heartbeat – that’s basically the same way of thinking as the serotonin hypothesis of the cause of the mental illness called depression.

I’m trying to make you understand the fallacy of psychiatry and what’s wrong with the lie of mental illness.

There are brain differences that can

1) coincide with certain emotions

2) and can cause cause changes in mental state.

But these differences are not brain or biological defects – please don’t underestimate the difference this truth makes. It’s the difference between cruelty and care.

I’m a veteran drug user and addict so I understand point 2 very well. Chemicals can change mental states. This is not proof of a brain defect though.

But point 1 is the hard truth. It’s what is wrong with the lie of mental illness and everything built upon the lie of mental illness. Biological differences are associated with mental states and emotions and mental suffering and mental diversity but they are not biological defects and not proof that a disease is responsible.

This is not some theoretical nuance. It is fundamental to the source of truth and the basis of care (and cruelty).

Duty of care and the methods and the objectives achieved by any means necessary (the difference between cruelty and care) (the meaning of vulnerability and what can and can’t be done to those labelled as vulnerable)

What is produced from the lie of mental illness is so so much wrong.

To suppose the cause of that mental suffering and mental diversity is a brain and biological defect is fundamental to the existence of psychiatry and mental health care. It’s a biological defect that’s responsible for diseases so by the lie of mental illness it’s these biological differences misrepresented as biological differences that’s responsible for ‘diseases’ and mental illnesses such as depression and schizophrenia. (It’s also the psychiatric difference between a mental illness and a personality disorder.)

Let me stick with the fallacy of the serotonin hypothesis and the lie of mental illness that makes misery a mental illness (or a “mental health problem” as the word that’s chosen by the politically correct movement to change words and still have the same meaning) labelled as depression.

It’s a tragedy beyond compare that this lie exists. Because it is responsible for so much heartlessness and cruelty that’s justified as care but only ever possible to justify when the lie of mental illness prevails.

The crux of the issue is the defective brain and defective mind as defined by the lie of mental illness.

It denigrates the validity of the mind and the validity of mental suffering. It dehumanises mental suffering and mental diversity as the product of a defective brain. Thus it destroys the path to genuine empathy and understanding when certain forms of mental states and mental diversity are the product of a defective brain thus the product of a defective mind. This one thing alone is responsible for crimes against humanity committed by psychiatrists that the path to empathy and understanding of the wide diversity of mental suffering and mental diversity they have destroyed by the lie of mental illness.

Simply put you don’t have empathy for emotions caused by a brain defect. You don’t try to understand a mind when it’s deemed to be defective and a product of a brain defect. You don’t fight for the equality of mental diversity that are caused by a brain defect and a mental illness.

Thus as individuals and as a collective the monsters who call themselves the human race have never stepped forth onto the path to understanding the wide diversity of mental diversity and mental suffering. This is a crime against humanity achieved by the prevail of psychiatry and the lie of mental illness upon which the institution of psychiatry is founded. You don’t need to try to understand a mind that is the product of a brain defect nor defend equality.

Can you comprehend just how much more cruelty prevails when you don’t have genuine empathy and understanding for certain types of mental diversity and mental suffering? (I face such inordinate cruelty every day I’m forced to live.)

The lie of mental illness is fundamentally dehumanising. It creates a class of individuals who are sub human because our brains are defective thus our mental suffering and our diversity is the product of a brain defect. We are deprived the protection of human rights – if no other evil than this it’s the tragedy of being sub human by the standards of psychiatrists.

Then there’s the objectives and the methods used to achieve the objectives of psychiatric and mental health care based on the lie of mental illness. Real crimes are committed because of the lie of mental illness but they’re not classed as crimes because they’re done in the name of care for we whose minds and suffering and diversity is the product of a brain defect and thus a mental illness.

So much cruelty is done in the name of psychiatric and mental health care.

It oppresses so many victims throughout the history of psychiatry. Because a defective brain results in a defective mind by the lie of mental illness.

The objectives and the methods based on the lie of mental illness have everything in common with cruelty and evil and oppression and subjugation and tyranny.

It’s the cruelty of the diagnosis of negritude. It’s a diagnosis sine doctors came up with to describe the difference between black and white skin as the product of a disease, of a biological defect not a biological difference. The diagnosis of negritude results in the objective of normalisation and this means that those diagnosed with negritude if this diagnosis existed today would be to turn black skin into white skin.

Psychiatry is all about normalisation so when homosexuality was deemed to be a mental illness then the objective is to make homosexuals normal and being heterosexual is what’s normal when psychiatrists oppressed the difference of being homosexual as a defect caused by a disease.

But back to the example of misery and the lie of mental illness.

You might suggest that it’s true that everyone should be happy so what’s wrong with the lie of mental illness and the mental illness labelled as depression and the products of the care based on the lie of mental illness and normalisation?

You don’t try to make someone happy when misery is the product of a brain defect. You don’t even need to try to have genuine empathy with miserable individuals when misery is a mental illness called depression.

(I’m skipping past the use of drugs but I’ll say here there’s no difference between antidepressants and delta 9 THC. They’re drugs not medications. They both affect the brain thus they affect the central nervous system. Delta 9 THC is one of the active components of cannabis. It’s a specific isomer of THC .)

But what the lie of mental illness does is to dehumanise the victims of psychiatry as minds that are incompetent because they’re the product of a defective brain.

So it results in the majesty of the evil of things like what “duty of care” means in a civilisation of monsters.

But also you accept the use of force and deprivation of liberty and imprisonment and even violence as the methods of care.

There are those who accept misery is part of life and there’s value to feeling miserable. Forced treatment doesn’t respect such diversity or – frankly – respect such wisdom.

There are those who always want to be happy and there are those who want to feel misery. In essence it’s this meaning of “we have to do this because it’s essential care”.

But what duty of care means is by any means necessary no matter how cruel and evil the methods are. Duty of care is care by unlimited cruelties and evils. It really means forced treatment and these methods include force and deprivation of liberty and imprisonment and even violence (forced injections). Duty of care also means the inherent cruelty of the methods used is irrelevant when it’s done out of a sense of care.

But it really does represent unlimited cruelties and evils. This is most obvious and most egregious in what can and can’t be done to a suicidal individual as much as the objectives of psychiatric and mental health care for suicidal individuals are evil too.

Because when the cause of why suicidal individuals feel suicidal and become suicidal and stay suicidal are the product of a defective brain and mind the validity of the suffering is destroyed and the mind is denigrated as sub human and the product of a defective brain.

It is the truth you do not have that being suicidal is the worst state of conscious existence. When it’s the product of a brain defect then it’s considered an appropriate response to use the methods of punishment on we who face what’s already worse than death but it’s not recognised for the truth suicidal individuals face but by the denigration of the validity of our minds that’s what is the purpose of the lie of mental illness.

It is literally unlimited cruelties and evils suicidal individuals are expected to face that’s fundamental to psychiatric and mental health care. What duty of care for suicidal individuals means is the ‘protection’ of the use of any method no matter how cruel or evil the methods are. “As long as we get whatever we want from a suicidal individual it doesn’t matter how cruel or evil our methods are” – is the majesty of the evil of what duty of care means in a civilisation of monsters.

It’s all about reaching the objective by any means necessary no matter how inherently cruel and evil the methods are that defines what duty of care means. I’m not talking about the cruelty of words here. I’m talking about being held down and pinned down and forcibly injected. I’m talking the methods of punishment being used on suicidal individuals as if to care about a suicidal individual involves using unlimited cruelty.

And there really is no such thing as too cruel to do to a suicidal individual in a civilisation of monsters. (Another reason to die the monsters who call themselves the human race have so expertly proved.)

That’s what represents the sense of care of everything built upon the lie of mental illness. We who face the worst state of conscious existence – what else is being suicidal – we face care that believes in using unlimited cruelties and evils so the monsters get whatever they want from a suicidal individual.

It’s the methods but it’s also the objective of psychiatric and mental health care that’s the true tragedy. The objective is based on the cultural and social prejudice that suicide is wrong.

The truth that it’s too awful to become suicidal and stay suicidal is the truth but it cannot be reached by the lie of mental illness.

It defines the objectives and the methods of everything built upon the lie of mental illness. It’s to prevent successful suicides by any means necessary no matter how cruel or evil they are they defines the ‘protections’ justified by psychiatric and mental health care. Care by unlimited cruelty is the meaning of duty of care in a civilisation of monsters. And the objective of care is also about what monsters want as much as monsters want to use unlimited cruelty on suicidal individuals: by any means necessary we deprive you of successful suicide.

The truth that it’s too awful to become suicidal and stay suicidal features nowhere in this civilisation of monsters. The will to achieve by any means necessary the objectives that are logical sequiturs of the truth that it’s too awful to become suicidal and stay suicidal doesn’t exist. The truth that being suicidal is the worst state of conscious existence and mental suffering doesn’t exist nor the objectives of care and the methods of by any means necessary to serve the objectives what’s so important to a suicidal individual.

So there is no sense of mercy in psychiatric and mental health care

I have poorly described the cruelty and the effects of the cruelty done to suicidal individuals that’s only ever possible by the lie of mental illness.

The will to achieve what monsters want for suicidal individuals is by any means necessary no matter how cruel and evil the methods are. This is what prevails for centuries.

Such will has no sense of mercy. The most basic compassion for suicidal individuals doesn’t exist so there’s no sense of mercy. Every single law that affects suicidal individuals and are created by the minds of law makers who believe they are protecting suicidal individuals they are all devoid of mercy.

The monsters who call themselves the human race can only care about forcing suicidal individuals to live. What’s important to a suicidal individual doesn’t feature in your sense of care. Because it’s only a sense of cruelty that the lie of mental illness achieves.

The truth that you to this day and to this moment you do not recognise is that it’s too awful to become suicidal and stay suicidal. It’s not a product of a defective brain but it’s the product of the fragility of conscious beings that’s why we can’t bear becoming suicidal or staying suicidal.

It’s a completely different objective from psychiatric and mental health care that it’s too awful to become suicidal and stay suicidal. The methods are different too and – do you want to face unlimited cruelty and the deprivation of human rights ever because that’s what is done by care based on the lie of mental illness?

What defines the sense of care based on the lie of mental illness is unlimited cruelty. It is a sense of cruelty because it is devoid of mercy.

It’s a concept of punishment that there must be mercy to achieve good justice. But there is no concept of mercy in psychiatric and mental health care and this defines the criminalisation of assisted suicide as much as so much more of what only monsters can do to we who suffer too much and are too different. Because – and I’m being kind here – of the prevail of the lie of mental illness and the dehumanisation inherent to the paradigms and practices of everything built upon the lie of mental illness.

As a victim of this lie let me state it clearly: when the sense of care of monsters utterly fails a suicidal individual (or any other victim of psychiatry) you have only more cruelty not mercy or remorse. That’s what defines what duty of care means in a civilisation of monsters. When you fail to care you justify the use of unlimited cruelty and that’s why assisted suicide is a crime.

You don’t have the right objectives and you do not recognise what you can’t do to a suicidal individual with any empathy or mercy.

Ask a suicidal individual how we feel about becoming suicidal and staying suicidal then you might start to care. And when you have the right objectives then I do welcome that will to achieve by any means necessary and with consent and the protection of the weak that’s what “duty of care” is meant mean.

Then you’ll have care with mercy not the sense of care I face.

What a species of monsters born and bred evil can’t do to a suicidal individual – it defines you as the monsters who call themselves the human race. Even now it’s all about you and just how incompetent a species of monsters born and bred evil are to care about this suicidal individual or any other.

YOU DO NOT HAVE A HEART TO STOP YOU SO THERE IS NO CARE HERE. YOU HAVE NO HEART SO YOU HAVE NO SENSE OF MERCY.

Whose job is it to destroy everything they’ve built to be free to hurt and make a suicidal individual want to die? If you can’t recognise this is the truth all about you then trust you are evil.

I’ve put years of work into communicating one point clearly. It is a point and a truth that is fundamentally anti-psychiatry and anti medical model.

The point is how awful it is to become suicidal and stay suicidal.

Many would say this is an obvious truth that is part of their sense of care for suicidal individuals. I have too much personal experience of what happens to me instead of killing me to know that no one has the competency to recognise the truth about just how beyond awful it is to be suicidal and stay suicidal.

It is critical to recognising why there is no care without assisted suicide to recognise how horrifically awful it is to feel suicidal and stay suicidal.

It is the worst state of conscious existence. It is the worst state of mental suffering. It is worth dying to escape from. It is worse than death. This is what being suicidal is about.

The truths in the above paragraph are not in evidence in the sense of care that prevails. I do not see anything in the medicalised suicide system and suicide laws that recognises just how awful it is what suicidal individuals face. I see unlimited cruelties and evils that defines psychiatric and mental health care…no…worse than this I am not just witness but victim to the will to use unlimited cruelty and evil on suicidal individuals.

Elsewhere I write about the human race as the monsters who call themselves the human race. One justification is the unlimited cruelties and evils I have faced when I’m suicidal already. These are so easily done by the monsters who call themselves the human race without remorse or mercy.

They are only acceptable consequences when those who purport to care about suicidal individuals are unaffected by how suicidal individuals feel. When unaffected by how suicidal individuals feel it’s so easy to believe that acceptable consequences are prolonging, furthering and worsening suicidality.

The risk of harm to suicidal individuals is not weighed right so what are unacceptable consequences to a suicidal individual – what do you think prolonging, furthering and worsening suicidality is to a suicidal individual? – are acceptable consequences and acceptable risks for monsters to take.

That’s why I’ve been suicidal for a decade continuously. It is what is only ever acceptable to a species of monsters born and bred evil that this is how long I remain suicidal – and the last decade is not the totality of my life I’ve faced life worse than death.

It is because too many bear my pain too easily and that’s the tragedy of every suicidal individual before me.

If you think I do face a sense of care then where’s the remorse and mercy? Mercy is fundamental to care and that’s why there’s no care without assisted suicide.

But let’s talk about the sense of responsibility which is: we can bear you to be tortured and be responsible for you being tortured but we can’t be responsible for your death.

When you are guided by the medicalised suicide system and the lie of mental illness you do not recognise cause and effect. It is a lie that deprives the pursuit of truth to say that suicidal individuals become suicidal and stay suicidal because are brains are defective thus our minds are defective.

So neither a sense of remorse exists nor a sense of responsibility for why suicidal individuals become suicidal and stay suicidal.

The sense of care I face doesn’t have a sense of remorse or mercy so it is so full of cruelty. How else can assisted suicide be a crime?

The cruelty I face is only possible when the competency to weigh the weight of knowing what’s worse than death from personal experience doesn’t exist. It is a sense of cruelty not care that has no mercy and so easily bears responsibility for the torture I face by being denied access to assisted suicide – clearly the only protection I can have against the will to torture me – but doesn’t bear the responsibility for killing me.

What assisted suicide represents to me is the bullet. The evil at the cores of the monsters who call themselves the human race is what pulls the trigger. There are other forces of course but the greatest force that pulls the trigger is the nature – human nature – of the monsters who call themselves the human race.

Because the monsters who call themselves the human race are always unaffected by how suicidal individuals. How else can assisted suicide be a crime? I will keep on feeling suicidal. The monsters who call themselves the human race do not have the competency to understand this information. They always fail to weigh the weight of how beyond horrific it is to become suicidal and stay suicidal. That’s why assisted suicide is a crime.

The crimes you do to me but they’re the crimes the monsters who call themselves the human race always do to suicidal individuals. You have no concept of what’s too cruel to do to a suicidal individual and you have no heart to stop you so you have no mercy – that’s what is responsible for my death not assisted suicide.

You don’t recognise the truth. You are too evil to be able to care.

It beggars belief the beliefs that defines the psychiatric and mental health systems.

It’s this concept of an incompetent mind. Everyone has a degree of mental incompetence but this is not what is the psychiatric meaning of an incompetent mind.

This post talks a bit about the fallacy of psychiatry and psychiatric concepts and paradigms and practices.

By the standards of psychiatrists those who kill others and make this choice to kill others (without consent) have flawless and competent minds so are not victims of the oppression and subjugation and dehumanisation of psychiatry.

“The tree of freedom must be from time to time wetted by the blood of patriots and tyrants”. I have misquoted here something that those who believe in liberty and dying and killing for the things that democracy is based on have in the past believed in. It is the will to die and kill for freedom and liberty and against tyranny this quote is about.

Then there’s also the minds of soldiers and those in the military. They too make the choice to kill and be killed.

Then there’s the minds of the government. They make the choice to go to war. The Falklands conflict is one example of so many examples of the minds that are ready to kill. The Falklands islands are a few small islands that are thousands of miles from Britain and part of Britain so when Argentina invaded the Falklands Britain sent men and women to kill and be killed to protect the Falklands.

But perhaps the best example of what are considered flawless and competent minds by the standards of psychiatrists are those who came up with and used the military doctirine of mutually assured destruction. This is something that prevailed on both sides of the Cold War.

It is a military doctrine primarily about nuclear war but I assume it can apply to other such mega death weapons where one munition can kill hundreds of thousands and even millions. One ICBM (a MIRV that comprises of several nuclear bombs in one missile) is a missile that could kill everyone in London. That’s the sort of technology I’m talking about.

The military doctrine of mutually assured destruction says that to protect against nuclear attack there must be the capability to annihilate the enemy. To prevent nuclear war both sides have to build massive arsenals of nuclear weapons capable of destroying the enemy and killing hundreds of millions directly and billions by the aftermath of nuclear war and of course ruin the planet. To achieve this a single nuke to hit a target is not enough to achieve the doctrine of mutually assured destruction. Multiple munitions are required to achieve the objective of the doctrine of mutually assured destruction. Not just one method of launching nuclear weapons is enough and instead triple redundancy is also deemed necessary so nukes launched by air and by sea and by land are required.

The example of the minds of freedom fighters, the minds of those in the military and the minds of those in the government are competent and flawless minds by the standards of psychiatrists. Thus such minds are not victims of the tyranny of evil of psychiatry.

The minds of those ready to kill (without consent) and mass murder are not mentally ill and do not have mental health problems. Thus they are competent and flawless minds by the standards of psychiatrists. The deaths and the suffering caused by the methods of war are acceptable consequences in the minds of many monsters. Such minds are deemed to be flawless and competent minds by the standards of psychiatrists. They are normal minds by the standards of psychiatrists.

But such minds in the examples above do know that death and dying and killing serves many purposes.

But every suicidal mind is an incompetent mind by the standards of psychiatrists throughout history. Throughout the history of the existence of psychiatry every single suicidal mind was considered to be an incompetent mind. By the standards of psychiatrists the suicidal mind is defective thus the validity of the mind is there to be denigrated by doctors. By the standards of psychiatrists the suicidal mind is there to be oppressed and subjugated and never be free. The suffering of suicidal individuals and the awfulness of feeling suicidal is there to be ignored because they are deemed to the product of an incompetent mind by the standards of psychiatrists.

A suicidal mind is ready to use our own death. By the standards of psychiatrists this is the product of a defective brain and an incompetent mind.

Those who perform assisted suicide are killing by consent. They are criminal minds by the standards of governments who are against the legalisation of assisted suicide.

The movement for the legalisation of assisted suicide has a divide based on the psychiatric concept of an incompetent mind.

But there are countless examples of minds deemed flawless by the standards of psychiatrists that know that death and dying and killing serves a purpose and they do choose death and mass murder without consent. These minds are not even expected to face a psychiatric assessment when they decide to use the methods of war.

So what?

The psychiatric meaning of an incompetent mind is meaningless especially when related to psychiatric labels and specific ‘symptoms’ such as the decision to use one’s death.

Everyone has a degree of mental incompetence and some more than others. But this doesn’t detract from the necessity of the legalisation of assisted suicide or the right to use one’s death. The incompetency of the mind is universal as is the horrific awfulness of feeling suicidal so there need to be a degree of protections that barrier access to assisted suicide. But it’s quite clear that being ready to use one’s death is not a specific form of mental incompetency and rather I suggest it’s a natural quality of conscious beings that is knowing there are things worth dying for and worth dying to escape from.

I can judge an incompetent mind by you who can’t recognise that there’s no care without assisted suicide. If you have the competency of a mind who is unaffected by how suicidal individuals feel then you will have the mental incompetency not competent to be able to recognise why there is no care without assisted suicide.

The majesty of the evil of you who are deemed to have competent minds by the standards of psychiatrists

In one of the responses to my efforts to legalise assisted suicide I got the majesty of the evil in “assisted suicide can’t be legal because vulnerable groups must be protected”. The specific meaning of vulnerability used is the same as the psychiatric meaning of an incompetent mind. It is the meaning of vulnerability used by those who don’t have the competency to recognise the difference between weakness and the fallibility of the mind. The psychiatric meaning of vulnerability is in common with the meaning of an incompetent mind. It refers to the fallibility of the mind but it is used to oppress and subjugate and denigrate the validity of a specific range of mental suffering and mental diversity. There is no truth in the specificity of the minds oppressed and denigrated by doctors as different from those who are deemed to be flawless and competent minds by the standards of psychiatrists. Their concept of incompetent minds is based on the lie of mental illness and the misrepresentation of brain differences as brain defects and proof of a disease.

More than this though is this truth that incompetent minds can’t recognise the difference between the fallibility of the mind and mental weakness. “Assisted suicide can’t be legal because we have to protect vulnerable groups” is what happens when the incompetence to recognise mental weakness and act accordingly prevails. Assisted suicide is fundamental to the protection of the weak and that’s why there’s no care without assisted suicide.

But look at the laws that affect suicidal individuals. Where do you see the protection of the weak? There’s only the protection against the fallibility of the mind. We who face the worst state of conscious existence and the worst state of mental suffering we get few if any protections like we’re weak from the law makers.

Look at all the laws that protect against physical suffering without consent. Look at the health and safety laws that protect against physical suffering and injury. Look at the hate laws that decree a worse crime when done out of hatred. Even look at the domestic abuse laws that decree a worse crime when it’s done in a relationship. Where are any such protections there for suicidal individuals?

But the laws that affect suicidal individuals legislate for unlimited cruelty and unlimited evil and unlimited suffering. They are based on the psychiatric meaning of vulnerability and an incompetent mind. But nowhere is the protection of the weak so obviously assisted suicide is a crime.

Assisted suicide is fundamental to the protection of the weak. It is mercy and that’s why there can be no care without assisted suicide.

To have to use one’s death to prevent unlimited cruelty and unlimited evil and unlimited suffering is the tragedy of the weak. It is a tragedy only made worse by those who can’t tell the difference between the protection of the weak and the protection against the fallibility of the mind. The tragedy becomes tragedies because of the existence of the institution of psychiatry and the social and cultural prejudices that lead to the circumstances from which the institution of psychiatry was invented.

This article paints the tragedy of the weak.

But so does every day of my continued existence.

If you have to ask why assisted suicide is fundamental to the protection of the weak you really do have an incompetent mind but only by my standards. You don’t have the personal experiences I do. You don’t have minds like mine?

What’s worth dying for and what’s worth dying to escape from?

It is a part of being that some know there are things worth dying for and worth dying to escape from. What’s the difference between a competent mind who knows this truth and an incompetent mind who knows this truth?

The criminalisation of assisted suicide is achieved by the denigration of the validity of the suicidal mind. It’s a denigration achieved by the prevail of the minds of the monsters who call themselves psychiatrists.

The most basic truth is there are things worth dying for and worth dying to escape from. Not every being has such a sort of mind to know this truth about existence. But what’s the difference between the minds of we who know there are things worth dying for and worth dying to escape from? Nothing – that’s the answer to the question that’s not based on the lie of mental illness. But ask a psychiatrist what’s their answer to the question what’s the difference between the minds of we who know there are things worth dying for and worth dying to escape from? Mental illness? Vulnerability? A disease? A brain defect? Their answers defines what is the difference between cruelty and care.

Then you think what is the competency of the minds who are willing to kill without consent and mass murder? These are competent minds who use the methods of war by the standards of psychiatrists. To even come up with the military doctrine of mutually assured destruction…but to accept it and work towards it these are competent minds by the standards of psychiatrists to accept mass murder and killing billions without consent and ruining the planet…to think these are acceptable consequences are flawless and competent minds by the standards of psychiatrists.

But the mind of a suicidal individual using our death to save us and protect us…we have what difference between the minds of monsters who agree mass murder without consent is an acceptable consequence?

What? A suicidal mind should know that things can get better eventually perhaps at some point so death isn’t warranted? But those who die and have killed for liberty and freedom and democracy…they should know death isn’t warranted because things might get better eventually perhaps at some point?

Nation states and governments go to war and kill without consent. Governments choose to use the choices of soldiers to kill and be killed because there are lines that cannot be allowed to be crossed. They don’t accept the sentiment “things might get better eventually at some point perhaps” and rather they refuse to allow the worst to happen so they send in soldiers and sailors and pilots to kill and be killed so a few small islands remain part of Britain (I’m talking about the Falklands conflict here).

They don’t need a psychiatric assessment before they accept the will of soldiers to kill and be killed. Because by the standards of psychiatrists they have flawless competent minds.

But a when suicidal individual chooses to die to escape what’s worse than death we are forced to live to suffer and endure against our will exactly what we need to die to escape from. We are victims of force and deprivation of liberty and imprisonment and persecution and subjugation and tyranny. What’s the competency of the minds of psychiatrists is a sense of care some suicidal individuals fear and rightly fear.

Then the minds of those who are ready to help suicidal individuals die – death by consent – are deemed to be criminal minds.

Why? The evil and heartlessness and prejudice that’s what suicidal minds (and other victims of psychiatry) always face throughout history.

The criminalisation of assisted suicide and the perception that a suicidal mind is a defective and incompetent mind is only the perpetuation of evil that is what I can trust the monsters who call themselves the human race to do and do well.

What the institution of psychiatry does is perpetuate evil but by misrepresenting brain differences as brain defects. There is no such historical prejudice against the minds of soldiers and the minds of those who make the choice to use the methods of war so such minds are flawless by the standards of psychiatrists.

The point is we all have incompetent minds and some more than others. This is not what psychiatry and mental health care is all about. They have a specific meaning of an incompetent mind that is based on the lie of mental illness. It is nothing to do with scientific truth or any other form of truth that is why the suicidal mind or a mind with “depression” or “schizophrenia” labels is deemed to be an incompetent mind.

But what the minds of psychiatrists do achieve is what’s in your minds. You are unaffected by how suicidal individuals feel. You don’t recognise that being suicidal is the worst state of conscious existence and the worst state of mental suffering so you do not act accordingly with the basic compassion for suicidal individuals competent minds have. This is a bold assertion.

Look at the laws that protect against physical suffering that protect the weak and they exist because of the empathy based on humanisation but you’re so unaffected by how suicidal individuals feel that there’s not the protection of the weak in the laws that affect suicidal individuals so obviously assisted suicide is a crime.

So what happens when you don’t have the competency to protect the weak? The tragedy of the prevail of incompetent minds is defined by what are considered acceptable consequences for suicidal individuals to face and feel.

The crux of the matter and the truth is we suicidal individuals are suicidal because we face what’s worse than death and worth dying for and worth dying to escape from. By this truth alone you should see the line a competent mind is drawing. By the same competency of the minds of the government to decide a line has been crossed that cannot be allowed and choose to use the methods of war a suicidal individual has the same competency of mind to know what’s right to use our deaths for.

But it’s our deaths we choose and those who have the compassion to help us die a good death by assisted suicide are killing with consent. We are choosing to use our deaths to escape unbearable suffering and unbearable quality of life. We are choosing to use our deaths to protect against unlimited cruelty and unlimited evil and unlimited suffering. We are drawing a line that cannot be a line in the sand. We are drawing a line in concrete that’s so important to us we choose to use our deaths to draw this line just like when Britain went to war for the Falklands islands.

We have the competency of minds who know there are things worth dying for and worth dying to escape from but we only use our deaths. And we are served by those who kill with consent, those who provide a good death.

But by the standards of psychiatrists our minds are incompetent minds and the minds of law makers who can’t recognise the meaning of vulnerability so can’t tell the difference between protecting against the fallibility of the mind and the protection of the weak are also competent minds by the standards of psychiatrists.

But the minds of those who are ready to kill and mass murder without consent are flawless and competent minds by the standards of psychiatrists.

So what truth is there in the difference between a competent mind and an incompetent mind as judged by the standards of psychiatrists?

You only have incompetent minds you who can’t recognise there is no care without the mercy of assisted suicide. But this truth is based on a suicidal mind nothing like the minds of psychiatrists and based on personal experiences of what happens to a suicidal individual when the minds of psychiatrists prevails.

You have nothing that resembles the protection of the weak and that’s the truth about what the minds of doctors achieved.

You don’t have the competency to care so you can’t recognise the truth. You can’t recognise the truth so you don’t have the competency to care. You do not have competent minds when it comes to the protection of the weak when it’s mental weakness. How else can assisted suicide be a crime.

I’m not sure where I’m going with this so bear with me.

In the history of evil and cruelty I assume there are many who felt suicidal because they are hungry.

(Perhaps a psychiatrist would say there’s hunger and starvation then there’s a mental disorder like “too poor to earn enough to feed oneself disorder” that’s a distinctly different thing from hunger and starvation. Brain scans of those with “too poor to feed oneself disorder” might also show biological differences in the brain that would be represented as proof of a brain defect and a disease by psychiatrists.)

In the history of heartlessness the response “so what” or “get over it” has been in the mind as thoughts or spoken in reply to “I’m so hungry I’m suicidal” or “I’m can’t feed my child and I want to die”.

Can you imagine how awful it is to be hungry and suicidal? It is something that has changed across centuries and generations the sort of empathy for hunger irrespective of the presence of suicidal suffering, feelings and thoughts.

(I admit that the types of mental diversity and mental suffering oppressed by psychiatry would be more likely to face hunger and suicidal hunger before the creation of the asylum system from which the institution of psychiatry was born )

Today and especially in the last half century there’s been many battles fought against hunger and starvation. The earliest example I can remember of this fight against evil and cruelty was Live Aid.

Today there is a different mentality far removed from “so what if you are starving” or “get used to starving”. None of the battles against hunger and starvation would be won if “it’s not that bad to be hungry” prevailed.

The individuals and organisations and movements who have won the battles against hunger and starvation whether by intent or not have fought against the prevail of evil and cruelty and the apathy of heartlessness to win the fight for the fulfillment of a basic need. By intent or not they reached for something as beautiful as the prevention of suicidality and the objective of living in safety from suicidality is.

This tiny little bit of good pales in comparison to all the evil and cruelty and heartlessness that prevails now. You might not recognise that the circumstances and conditions that used to exist that meant so many went hungry is evil and cruelty and the apathy of heartlessness but you should do.

The battles won against the existence of hunger and starvation are for the war* for basic needs. Hunger is specifically a physical need but it can lead to the worst state of conscious existence and the worst state of mental suffering which is what being suicidal is.

(*- I class a war as the objective achieved by the many battles.)

I assume those who go to fight against hunger do not do it for suicidal individuals. They didn’t do it because they recognise human cruelty and evil is the primary cause of why suicidal individuals become suicidal and stay suicidal.

They do it for other reasons. I don’t know all the reasons used by those who fight against hunger but I do believe there’s a certain level of heart instead of the apathy of heartlessness that drives them to prevent hunger and rapidly end hunger wherever it exists.

Their efforts however do affect the tragedies of suicidal individuals. They have achieved a tiny bit of the objective of safety from suicidality and the prevention of suicidality. Never before are so many safe from feeling suicidal because they are hungry as they are now.

But can you imagine what you would face a scant few centuries ago? If you lived in the times when you would face “so what if you are hungry and starving?” and you were victim to the evil and cruelty that prevails how would you feel? Would you be unhappy and miserable and suffering because you are hungry? Would you feel suicidal because you feel hungry and keep on feeling hungry and there’s nothing you can do? When you live when no one cares about how awful it feels to feel hungry and keep on feeling hungry and keep on feeling suicidal because you keep on feeling hungry how would you feel about the hope of the mercy and protection of assisted suicide?

This is the first point I want you to take from this post. You must recognise there are evils and cruelties you would be glad to never be born than be born and risk facing. You must recognise there are things worse than death. If you lived a few centuries ago and you faced the apathy of the heartless “get over it” or “so what” or “it’s not that bad” when you are hungry and keep on feeling hungry and keep on feeling suicidal because you are hungry do you think you would be best served by continuing to be forced to live…there is no question. You don’t want to live when the apathy of the heartless – in the example it’s just one domain of the evil and cruelty of accepting hunger as something you should be expected to face and get used to – prevails.

The second point is the objective stated as one of these phrases is possible: the objective of living in safety from suicidality; the prevention of suicidal feelings and thoughts; the protection of something as precious as an individual’s will to live. Those who won the battles against hunger and starvation don’t do it for suicidal individuals but irrespective of their intent they serve the protection of suicidal individuals by what’s so important to a suicidal individual which is “I wish I never became suicidal”.

Point 3 is the competency to care

The fight against the evil and cruelty that’s the primary cause of why suicidal individuals become suicidal and stay suicidal. This is what care is from an anti-psychiatry truth.

One battle of this war has had a lot of success. The fight against hunger.

It is by intent or not that one basic need is battled for that’s what the individuals and organisations and movements against hunger have won time and again. It is a basic need to be free from hunger.

They didn’t do it because the things that make suicidal individuals want to die represents the things that harm others greatly. They didn’t do it because the they recognise the reasons suicidal individuals have to die are a path to recognising what are basic human mental needs by how the absence of the respect and protection and fulfilment of these basic needs you all have profoundly affects the weak who are made suicidal. They didn’t do it because they recognise the things what make suicidal individuals become suicidal and stay suicidal are the product of unacceptable evil and cruelty.

(Again it’s why I fight for the safety I can only achieve in death that the monsters who call themselves the human race have so generously given me so many personal experiences to prove I can’t live in safety amongst monsters like you the monsters who call themselves the human race.)

But if you do want to serve the objective of the better future sooner then you have to recognise the basic needs of conscious beings. These needs are never more clear than by what happens in the absence of the respect and protection and fulfilment of these most basic needs that then causes the worst state of conscious existence and the worst state of mental suffering to exist.

It is the competency to care about one and all that the first step is to recognise these basic needs by what makes suicidal individuals become suicidal and stay suicidal. It is to recognise the primary cause of why suicidal individuals become suicidal and stay suicidal is the prevail of evil and cruelty and the apathy of the heartless.

(Again it’s why I fight for the safety I can only achieve in death that the monsters who call themselves the human race have so generously given me so many personal experiences to prove I can’t live in safety amongst monsters like you the monsters who call themselves the human race.)

But it’s also to recognise what you must recognise by the principle of humanisation that’s what I have that’s different from psychiatric and mental health care. We the weak, the sensitive, the fragile who become suicidal and stay suicidal by the prevail of evil and cruelty in this civilisation of monsters we represent the great suffering of the many who are not suicidal*. This is the truth you’ll never have when you dehumanise suicidal individuals as mentally ill.

(*I make this point elsewhere by talking about suicidal individuals like we’re the canaries in the mine. When miners went to work in the mines they risked dying because of invisible toxic gases. So they took canaries in cages into the mine. The invisible toxic gases would kill the canaries first before they killed the miners so the miners were saved. The canaries are like we weak and fragile and sensitive who become suicidal and stay suicidal because of the prevailing evil and cruelty and non suicidal individuals are like the miners in this analogy. We are the warning that represents the suffering of non suicidal individuals.)

This is the end of the points so let me add another element.

I read about someone recently who feels suicidal because their life lacks meaning. Those who label themselves as human beings might not need to have meaning to existence. But we who label ourselves as conscious beings this is one of our basic needs.(.. perhaps I should just my say “my needs”?)

You can face this one specific issue of meaning to exist with “so what” or “get used to it” or “it’s not that bad to have a meaningless existence”. But you will never save suicidal individuals or any conscious beings this way and in fact what you will do is make access to assisted suicide even more invaluable.

Meaning to exist is an important mental need. It’s just like other mental needs you can recognise by the consequences of these needs not being recognised or protected or fulfilled by what makes suicidal individuals become suicidal and stay suicidal.

You know what is perhaps as sad as everything else? Politicians have a modicum of this feeling of a meaningful existence I assume. They don’t recognise this basic need because it’s fulfilled and this parallels how the will to live is not protected by those who have not lost it so don’t know how precious it is. So they don’t fight for it to protect it.

But it is a basic mental need for conscious beings to have some meaning to exist. Perhaps not for all of the monsters who call themselves the human race but it is still a basic mental need.

No doubt there’s the pain of the fight too and that’s another factor. But it’s to recognise the basic needs of conscious beings by recognising them from what makes suicidal individuals become suicidal and stay suicidal.

The fight for the objective of living in safety from suicidality and the prevention of suicidality is a fight not just for the protection of the weak who become suicidal because of the absence of the respect and protection and fulfilment of these basic needs. It is a war that does serve one and all.

The points I make elsewhere about the necessity of the legalisation of assisted suicide are structured on being affected by how suicidal individuals feel. But there are so many other benefits borne from the humanisation of suicidal individuals that defines the protection of the weak. This is the basis for care and the competency to care is based upon. Being affected by how suicidal individuals feel. It’s never happened before.

You do recognise that all the weak are protected by the battles won to protect against hunger? But do you see the war of which the fight against hunger is but one battle like I do? It’s the war for care based on the most basic empathy to recognise just how beyond awful it is to become suicidal and stay suicidal.

Without this most basic compassion what do you think is going to happen to something like me living amongst monsters like you?

I am better off having never been born than to live to face what I face. The competency to care does not exist yet. I am one of the legion of the damned and we the legion of the damned are better off having never been born than live amongst monsters like the monsters who call themselves the human race. Because you think you can care but you don’t recognise the difference between cruelty and care and that’s the truth from all the personal experiences the monsters who call themselves the human race have given me of the absolutely flawless cruelty the monsters who call themselves the human race force me to live to perfect…as if my suffering will never satiate the evil at your cores even when I’m suicidal already.

You might think I write here about hope. Let me make it clear how I feel by what I have said already.

This tiny little bit of good pales in comparison to all the evil and cruelty and heartlessness that prevails now. You might not recognise that the circumstances and conditions that used to exist that meant so many went hungry is evil and cruelty and the apathy of heartlessness but you should do.

Who else can expect an individual to keep on feeling hungry or keep on feeling suicidal? But that’s what the monsters who call themselves the human race believe is a basis for care.

I assume parents of terminally ill children can feel suicidal. But can you assume that the minds of schizophrenic minds can feel suicidal? Of course.

But can you have empathy for a suicidal schizophrenic mind? Someone going through a vastly different reality from what you experience but it’s hell.

You can understand the suicidality of parents with terminally ill children. You can have empathy.

But what do you know about the suffering and diversity of the schizophrenic mind that gives you empathy with what we face? It’s not so bad to be suicidal when you are labelled as crazy? Or because the concepts of mental illness destroys the hope you can have empathy for those labelled with mental illnesses such as schizophrenia it is even worse to be suicidal and deemed to be mentally ill because we don’t get empathy?

(if I make the point poorly then let me try to sum it up. If you have the capacity to feel then you have a limit to what you suffer and endure against your will. Beyond this limit you’ll be suicidal. This is the competency of a mind that has the capacity to feel to feel suicidal when a line that cannot be crossed has been crossed. It’s exactly this rational and natural to feel suicidal if you have the capacity to feel. If you don’t have the capacity to feel – if you are not weak – then you will never be suicidal and you will never need the mercy and protection of assisted suicide.)

I have another post I’m working on in response to the following post linked to below.

https://www.mydeath-mydecision.org.uk/info/issues/curable-depression-or-misery/

One thing the author is arguing for is the possibility that some…I think specifically they believe certain reasons to die are understandable thus not mental illnesses.

Bereavement is the example of how mental suffering that presents exactly as the clinical diagnostic criteria for depression expects the symptoms of depression to be it is not a mental illness. The suffering of grief is argued to be natural and understandable thus it’s not a mental illness thus it’s not the product of a defective brain and a defective mind.

Throughout the movement for the legalisation of assisted suicide there is a common theme of “for mentally competent minds” or something similar. There is also a division in the movement for the legalisation of assisted suicide where some believe that certain reasons to die are acceptable reasons to grant access to assisted suicide.

The link above is from an organisation that believes in rational suicide in old age. Implicitly they are saying elderly individuals who choose to die are making a rational choice to die so it’s not a mental illness that’s why they want to die. Instead it’s an understandable set of thoughts and feelings the elderly have who choose to die prematurely.

In the post above or elsewhere on their site they talk about “life being complete” as a rational state of mind that deserves access to assisted suicide. It is an understandable reason to die thus it is deemed to be a rational choice thus it is not a mental illness – I think is the logical steps the author is using.

This is the logic of the dehumanisation of suicidal individuals and the denigration of the validity of the suicidal mind the author has so well expressed. The author is arguing for and against this but only against it for a specific classification of suicidal individuals. The author’s argument is based on the perception of the rationality and how understandable the reason to die is that defines in their mind a sanctioned suicide thus access to a good death should be provided. The author mentions other elements of the acceptable or unacceptable criteria for access to assisted suicide but I do believe primarily they are talking about concepts and dehumanisation based on the theory and the lie of mental illness.

They are talking about the competency of the mind as a criteria for evaluating what is an understandable reason to die but competency based on the understanding of the mind as different from the mind of someone labelled as mentally ill. Their understanding of the mind and the reason or reasons to die means the individual is not mentally ill – I think the author makes this point explicitly and implicitly. Whereas if they do not have understanding or empathy for the reasons to die then the suicidal thoughts and feelings are from a mentally ill mind thus a defective mind.

(Doubtless the author has other criteria for judging what’s a sanctioned suicide but it’s the specificity of the concepts of dehumanisation used throughout the existence of psychiatry they are using to denigrate the validity of the will to die as the product of a mental illness that’s what they are arguing for and against but only against for reasons to die and mental suffering they perceive with understanding and empathy.

Who do they work for?

The things I am trying to build upon are foundations quite different and in opposition to the fundamentals of psychiatry and mental health care.

What the author has done and no doubt better than I can do is to humanise a specific group of suicidal individuals. This is the antithesis of psychiatry to humanise any suicidal individuals. But the author is making a distinction between a suicidal mind that is part of the spectrum of understandable normality and a mentally ill suicidal mind. They also mention bereavement which though it might present within the accepted clinical diagnostic criteria for the mental illness depression it is not classed as the mental illness depression. I assume if the author was presented with brain scans showing a difference between those who are miserable because of bereavement and those who are normal (not miserable/sad/unhappy/in mental pain) he would argue that it is obvious that grief is not a mental illness. If these brain differences are the same differences as in those labelled with depression then I assume the author would still argue that grief is not a mental illness.

Grief it is understandable misery so it is not the mental illness depression. I think this is what the author is saying.. Grief is a rational response whereas as a mental illness is not irrespective of whether the presentation of grief fits within the diagnostic criteria for the mental illness depression or if brain scans demonstrate a biological difference.

The author’s mind and logic defines the divides in the movement for the legalisation of assisted suicide as well as the fear of the “slippery slope” in the minds and logic of those who are anti suicide. The divide is based on the lie of mental illness and the dehumanisation of this false paradigm.

I have a different approach and a different foundation: it’s too awful to become suicidal and stay suicidal. I speak from vast amounts of personal experience of suicidal suffering, feelings and thoughts. It’s what I have to humanise suicidal individuals that the human race has so generously given me so much personal experience of.

It is simply to recognise that if you face the same suicidal thoughts and feelings you can’t bear to live. It’s irrespective of the reason or reasons to die that’s how you have empathy and understanding for suicidal individuals. The same level of suffering, the same feelings of being so far beyond the limit to what you can suffer and endure against your will. The same hopelessness and powerlessness and despair when facing unlimited suffering and unlimited cruelty. When you face these things yourselves you will understand it is universally beyond awful to feel suicidal and face what’s worse than death irrespective of the reason to die.

My bad self does inside judge some reasons to die as more powerful reasons than others. But my less bad self knows that it is not the reason to die that defines the validity and rationality of the suicidal mind. It is the feelings and thoughts if suicidal individuals that if you faced them you would want to die too – this is the universality of the validity of the suicidal mind. This is at the same time an extremely obvious truth that if you face the same suicidal suffering, feelings and thoughts a suicidal individual faces then you would want the same thing as a suicidal individual wants but it’s also a truth that has never prevailed before or affected what can and can’t be done to a suicidal individual. It’s an anti-psychiatry truth because it’s about humanisation and the empathy and understanding of humanisation that’s the opposite of what the prevail of psychiatry has created.

Let me try to persuade you.

Three examples of reasons to die

• Unrequited or lost love
• Loneliness and being a victim of social exclusion
• Life is meaningless

I understand the pain in all of these reasons to die beyond the reason to die. Those who are labelled with mental illness I do believe are more likely to face such reasons to die but I do not believe in the lie of mental illness.

What I know from so much personal experience so expertly given to me by the monsters who call themselves the human race is the pain and sheer horrific awfulness of feeling suicidal. This is the point. For the purposes of understanding and the validation of the suicidal mind the reason or reasons to die do not matter. If you experience the suicidal thoughts and feelings as a suicidal individual does you would choose to die – that’s the truth.

(Obviously for attempts to end the suicidality of a suicidal individual the reason to die is vital…but again such a sense of care that uses the information about what makes a suicidal individual want to die it cannot come from the basis of care that’s the lie of mental illness. Thus drugs are the primary recourse used by those who think the lie of mental illness is not a lie.)

Let me say it again

If you experience the suicidal thoughts and feelings as a suicidal individual does you would choose to die – that’s the truth.

This the basis of the humanisation of suicidal individuals as is the foundation of truth that it’s simply too awful to become suicidal and stay suicidal.

When dying is better than living I can’t in all good conscience make a divide between how awful it is to lose the will to live or to face what’s worse than death or being so far beyond the limit to what an individual can suffer and endure.

(Of course the feelings might be resolved quickly or solutions found. But equally things can get so much worse beyond becoming suicidal. These possibilities don’t take away from the natural quality of feeling suicidal and do not affect the judgement of just how beyond awful it is to become suicidal and stay suicidal. It is however important to me for the competency to care to be demonstrated to a suicidal individual which is an expectation that is fundamentally anti-psychiatry and based on the humanisation of suicidal individuals. It gives suicidal individuals power to have this expectation whereas the purpose of the lie of mental illness is to make suicidal individuals face even more powerlessness than the powerlessness that makes dying such a great solution.)

While I might not fully understand every single reason to die this is only because of my faults and failures to understand the wide diversity of mental suffering and mental diversity that’s why I fail to fully understand every reason to die as natural and rational and worthy – that’s my incompetency.

The decision to die is always understandable and rational. Not by the reason to die but by the thoughts and feelings of suicidal individuals which if you face you would choose to die too.

When you are so far beyond the limit to what you can suffer and endure you will want to die. When you face what’s worse than death – something that is quite individual what defines what is worse than death to you – you will want to die. When you face unlimited suffering and unlimited cruelty you will understand why there’s no care without assisted suicide.

When you face it you’ll understand.

This is the gift the monsters who call themselves the human race have given me. I face so much suicidality and so many reasons to die I have the truth about the awfulness of becoming suicidal and staying suicidal and I recognise just how beyond awful it is irrespective of the reason to die or any other characteristics of the suicidal mind.

(And from these personal experiences the monsters who call themselves the human race have so generously gifted me with I know I live amongst a species of monsters born and bred evil.)

I know every single decision to die is natural and rational. You’d want the same thing if you face what a suicidal individual faces not by the reason to die but by the empathy you should already have had had the lie of mental illness not prevailed for centuries.

Let me reinforce the point.

While I might not fully understand every single reason to die this is only because of my faults and failures to understand the wide diversity of mental suffering and mental diversity that’s why I fail to fully understand every reason to die.

It is in the statement above that I believe defines the problem with incompetent minds. The incompetency of minds who need the lie of mental illness to care. It only exists because of the incompetency of the minds of the monsters who call themselves the human race to understand the wide diversity of mental suffering and mental diversity by humanisation, by understanding the diversity of the mind like you now recognise the wide and natural diversity of gender or ethnicity or sexuality by equality.*

(* Look at the history of evil and cruelty and prejudice and each one of these parts of mental diversity have faced oppression and subjugation and discrimination based on biological differences misrepresented as defects. Women have less capable brains. Black skinned individuals should be slaves. Because they are sub human based on misrepresentation of biological differences as defecits. Homosexuals were victims of psychiatry.)

It is not the reason to die you should need to recognise the horrific awfulness of feeling suicidal. It is knowing it is too awful to become suicidal and stay suicidal. It’s knowing if you faced the thoughts and feelings – the awfulness of the pain of a suicidal individual – you would make the same choice to escape what’s worse than death.

To sanction a suicide there are certain criteria that might be important to you when you are suicidal but to sanction a suicide the reason to die should be irrelevant for this reason: it’s too awful to become suicidal and stay suicidal. You can’t care without the truth.

You only bear what I am put through by being forced to live until it happens to you. You only bear the constancy and inexorable progress of my suicidality until it happens to someone you care about like yourself.

The reason to die for lost love it has everything in common with grief. But it’s the awfulness of suicidal thoughts and feelings that should guide you in the universality of the validity of what’s worth dying for and worth dying to escape from. Loneliness too is a good reason to die. Life is meaningless and pointless – some bear this so lightly whereas others bear it so heavily that it’s a life worse than death. These three reasons to die I assume are experienced by those who the author is arguing do deserve access to assisted suicide but whereas the author specified a difference between these acceptable reasons to die are the product of a competent mind I believe all suicidality are the natural product of a competent mind. If for no other reason than if you have the capacity to feel then you have a limit to the suffering and cruelty you can suffer and endure against your will.

Of course there might be other criteria for access to assisted suicide. But to judge one reason to die as valid whereas another is not valid it is only the product of the consistent dehumanisation of the suicidal mind and other victims of psychiatry.

It is universally beyond awful what suicidal individuals face. This is the absolute best truth I can give you.

(I imagine one of the monsters who call themselves the human race reading this and thinking “we already know just how beyond awful it is to feel suicidal” and I know you don’t recognise how awful it is to become suicidal and stay suicidal. Because the protections of suicidal individuals how the weak are meant to be protected are yet to be invented. I know from so many personal experiences the monsters who call themselves the human race have so generously gifted me with that they have never cared about a suicidal individual before. There is no will to protect suicidal individuals in a humane way and how the weak are meant to be protected. There’s no will to make further and worsening of suicidality avoidable yet, yet this objective is as fundamental to the protection of the weak as assisted suicide is. The competency to care doesn’t exist yet.)

(I do wonder if I’m just facing the prejudices against the act of suicide. These Christian prejudices became enforced by psychiatry. Because the monsters who call themselves the human race can’t do anything else. The prevail of incompetent minds who don’t have the competency to recognise that there are things that are worse than death and that’s what being suicidal is about. It’s all about recognising that death isn’t the worst thing that can happen to you – again an obvious truth but it’s never prevailed before.)

(What happens when suicidality keeps on going? – every single day the devil’s own prove the answer to this question in this generation of the monsters who call themselves the human race